• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同侧乳腺癌复发:高发量中心的特征、治疗及长期肿瘤学结果。

Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: Characteristics, Treatment, and Long-Term Oncologic Results at a High-Volume Center.

机构信息

Breast Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Breast Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug;21(4):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2020.12.006
PMID:33431329
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Salvage mastectomy is considered the treatment of choice for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR), even if a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is feasible. The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of IBCR patients, to compare the 2 therapeutic options in terms of long-term outcomes, and to identify independent factors that may predict the type of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 309 IBCR patients who underwent either repeat BCS or mastectomy were identified. All the analyzed patients with IBCR had true recurrence.

RESULTS

Repeat BCS and salvage mastectomy were performed in 143 and 166 patients, respectively. Age < 65 years (59.6% vs 37.1% if age ≥ 65 years; odds ratio, 2.374; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-5.24; P = .018) and disease-free interval < 24 months (15.7% vs 10.5% if disease-free interval ≥ 24 months; odds ratio, 2.705; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.97; P = .007) were found to significantly increase the probability of receipt of mastectomy. Disease-free survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 79.2%, 68.2%, and 36.9%; and 77.2%, 65.9%, and 55.3% in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy, respectively (P = .842). Overall survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years were 95.4%, 91.4%, and 68.5%; and 87.3%, 69.3%, and 57.9%, respectively, in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy (P = .018).

CONCLUSION

Salvage mastectomy should not be considered the only treatment option for IBCR. A second BCS can still be evaluated and proposed to IBCR patients, with acceptable locoregional control and survival. The risk of poor long-term prognosis after mastectomy should be shared with the patient.

摘要

简介

对于同侧乳腺癌复发(IBCR),即使可行二次保乳手术(BCS),挽救性乳房切除术也被认为是首选治疗方法。本研究的目的是描述 IBCR 患者的特征,比较两种治疗方法的长期结果,并确定可能预测治疗方式的独立因素。

患者和方法

共确定了 309 例接受再次 BCS 或乳房切除术的 IBCR 患者。所有 IBCR 患者均为真正复发。

结果

分别有 143 例和 166 例患者接受了重复 BCS 和挽救性乳房切除术。年龄<65 岁(59.6% vs 年龄≥65 岁者的 37.1%;优势比,2.374;95%置信区间,0.92-5.24;P=0.018)和无病间期<24 个月(15.7% vs 无病间期≥24 个月者的 10.5%;优势比,2.705;95%置信区间,1.42-5.97;P=0.007)与接受乳房切除术的概率显著增加相关。接受重复 BCS 或乳房切除术的患者的无复发生存率分别为 3 年时 79.2%、5 年时 68.2%、10 年时 36.9%和 77.2%、65.9%、10 年时 55.3%(P=0.842)。接受重复 BCS 或乳房切除术的患者的总生存率分别为 3 年时 95.4%、5 年时 91.4%、10 年时 68.5%和 87.3%、69.3%、10 年时 57.9%(P=0.018)。

结论

对于 IBCR,不应仅将挽救性乳房切除术视为唯一治疗选择。仍可对 IBCR 患者进行二次 BCS 评估并提出建议,局部区域控制和生存情况可接受。应与患者分享乳房切除术预后不良的风险。

相似文献

1
Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: Characteristics, Treatment, and Long-Term Oncologic Results at a High-Volume Center.同侧乳腺癌复发:高发量中心的特征、治疗及长期肿瘤学结果。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug;21(4):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Breast conserving surgery versus salvage mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis.保乳手术与挽救性乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺癌复发的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):479-489. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01122-3. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Repeat breast-conserving therapy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A systematic review.重复保乳疗法治疗同侧乳腺癌复发:一项系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1317-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Outcomes of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving surgery: Repeat lumpectomy as an alternative to salvage mastectomy.保乳手术后同侧乳房肿瘤复发的结果:再次局部切除术作为挽救性乳房切除术的替代方法。
Surgery. 2022 Mar;171(3):673-681. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.069. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
5
Long-term Survival Comparison of Repeated Breast-conserving Surgery Versus Mastectomy for Patients with DCIS with Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence: A Real-world Longitudinal Study.保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的 DCIS 患者长期生存比较:一项真实世界的纵向研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug;21(4):360-372. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Salvage Mastectomy Is not the Treatment of Choice for Aggressive Subtypes of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.挽救性乳房切除术并非同侧乳腺癌复发侵袭性亚型的首选治疗方法:一项单机构回顾性研究
Eur J Breast Health. 2022 Oct 1;18(4):315-322. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-5-3. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.乳头溢液相关乳腺癌患者保乳手术的可行性
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):508-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20394.
8
Repeat lumpectomy for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Preliminary results.保乳手术后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发患者的重复肿块切除术。初步结果。
Oncology. 2003;64(1):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000066512.
9
Surgical management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.同侧乳房肿瘤复发的外科治疗。
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.084. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Increased Mortality with Repeat Lumpectomy Alone After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence.同侧乳腺肿瘤复发后单纯再次行保乳术,死亡率增加。
Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):e818-e827. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0606. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher 10-Year Survival with Breast-Conserving Therapy over Mastectomy for Women with Early-Stage (I-II) Breast Cancer: Analysis of the CDC Patterns of Care Data Base.早期(I-II期)乳腺癌女性保乳治疗较乳房切除术有更高的10年生存率:对疾病预防控制中心医疗模式数据库的分析
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2024 Sep 23;18:11782234241273666. doi: 10.1177/11782234241273666. eCollection 2024.
2
Surgical Management and Its Impact on Adjuvant Treatment in Recurrent Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.复发性同侧乳腺癌的手术治疗及其对辅助治疗的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5142. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175142.
3
Patient Preference for Surgical Methods for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence.
患者对同侧乳房肿瘤复发的手术方法的偏好。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4512-4517. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15282-0. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Combined Ultrahypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation and IORT-Boost: A Safety and Feasibility Analysis.超分割全乳照射与术中放疗增敏联合应用:安全性与可行性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 9;16(6):1105. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061105.
5
Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Results in Young Women with Breast Cancer between BRCA-Mutation Carriers Versus Non-Carriers: How Tumor and Genetic Risk Factors Influence the Clinical Prognosis.携带与不携带BRCA基因突变的年轻乳腺癌女性的长期肿瘤学结果比较:肿瘤和遗传风险因素如何影响临床预后。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;15(16):4177. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164177.
6
Salvage Mastectomy Is not the Treatment of Choice for Aggressive Subtypes of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.挽救性乳房切除术并非同侧乳腺癌复发侵袭性亚型的首选治疗方法:一项单机构回顾性研究
Eur J Breast Health. 2022 Oct 1;18(4):315-322. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-5-3. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Retraction Note: Breast conserving surgery versus salvage mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis.撤稿说明:保乳手术与挽救性乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺癌复发:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1795. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01342-1.
8
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Role of Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery for the Management of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence.系统评价和荟萃分析:重复保乳手术在同侧乳腺癌复发管理中的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6440-6453. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12197-6. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
Breast Cancer Surgery: New Issues.乳腺癌手术:新问题。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 11;28(5):4053-4066. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050344.
10
Breast conserving surgery versus salvage mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis.保乳手术与挽救性乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺癌复发的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):479-489. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01122-3. Epub 2021 Jun 28.