Suppr超能文献

患者工作的人因工程学工作系统分析:科学现状与未来方向

Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions.

作者信息

Werner Nicole E, Ponnala Siddarth, Doutcheva Nadia, Holden Richard J

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):60-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa099.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the use and value of the Human Factors/Ergonomics-based Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) family of work system models for studying and improving patient work.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a review of the published empirical literature applying the SEIPS family of work system models for patient work.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies had to apply one of the SEIPS family of work system models to study patient work; be published in a peer-reviewed journal in English and include analysis of data. We identified 16 articles that met our inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each study, we extracted settings and situations in which models were applied; research design; study methods; model(s) used; type and number of study participants; study objective(s); whether the study included an intervention; specific aspects of the model used; knowledge generated about patient work and benefits of using the models.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Our analysis revealed that a majority of studies were conducted in the United States, used qualitative or mixed methods and employed a variety of data collection techniques to study adult patient populations with chronic illness and their informal caregivers and healthcare providers performing patient work in the home and clinical setting. The studies resulted in a variety of useful products, demonstrating several benefits of using the models.

CONCLUSION

Our review has demonstrated the value of using the SEIPS family of work systems models to study and improve patient and family contributions to health-related work.

摘要

目的

展示基于人因工程学的患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)工作系统模型家族在研究和改善患者工作方面的应用及价值。

数据来源

我们对已发表的将SEIPS工作系统模型家族应用于患者工作的实证文献进行了综述。

研究选择

纳入的研究必须应用SEIPS工作系统模型家族中的一种来研究患者工作;发表于英文同行评审期刊且包含数据分析。我们确定了16篇符合纳入标准的文章。

数据提取

对于每项研究,我们提取了应用模型的环境和情况;研究设计;研究方法;使用的模型;研究参与者的类型和数量;研究目的;研究是否包括干预;所使用模型的具体方面;所产生的关于患者工作的知识以及使用这些模型的益处。

数据综合结果

我们的分析表明,大多数研究在美国进行,采用定性或混合方法,并运用多种数据收集技术来研究患有慢性病的成年患者群体及其非正式护理人员以及在家庭和临床环境中从事患者工作的医疗保健提供者。这些研究产生了各种有用的成果,证明了使用这些模型的若干益处。

结论

我们的综述证明了使用SEIPS工作系统模型家族来研究和改善患者及家庭对健康相关工作的贡献的价值。

相似文献

1
Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):60-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa099.
2
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
4
Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
5
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Sociotechnical systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1(0 1):3850-4. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0091-3850.
10
Adopting systems models for multiple incident analysis: utility and usability.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab135.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Older Adults' Work on the Arduous Path to Spine Surgery.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70850. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70850. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Occupational accidents and the use of PPE: a global meta-analysis.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 21;12:1368991. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368991. eCollection 2024.
7
Macroergonomic components of the patient work system shaping dyadic care management during adolescence: a case study of type 1 diabetes.
Ergonomics. 2024 Nov;67(11):1575-1595. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2343942. Epub 2024 May 7.
8
Protocol for a scoping review of work system design in health care.
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 30;12:21. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128913.2. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e16656. doi: 10.2196/16656.
2
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Patient ergonomics: 10-year mapping review of patient-centered human factors.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102972. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102972. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Hazards from physical attributes of the home environment among patients on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Apr;47(4):425-430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
Uncovering the invisible patient work system through a case study of breast cancer self-management.
Ergonomics. 2018 Dec;61(12):1575-1590. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1503339. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Framework for Evaluating and Implementing Inpatient Portals: a Multi-stakeholder Perspective.
J Med Syst. 2018 Jul 16;42(9):158. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1009-3.
10
An East-West comparison of self-care barriers in heart failure.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Oct;8(7):615-622. doi: 10.1177/2048872617744352. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验