• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者工作的人因工程学工作系统分析:科学现状与未来方向

Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions.

作者信息

Werner Nicole E, Ponnala Siddarth, Doutcheva Nadia, Holden Richard J

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):60-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa099.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzaa099
PMID:33432984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7802067/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the use and value of the Human Factors/Ergonomics-based Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) family of work system models for studying and improving patient work.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a review of the published empirical literature applying the SEIPS family of work system models for patient work.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies had to apply one of the SEIPS family of work system models to study patient work; be published in a peer-reviewed journal in English and include analysis of data. We identified 16 articles that met our inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each study, we extracted settings and situations in which models were applied; research design; study methods; model(s) used; type and number of study participants; study objective(s); whether the study included an intervention; specific aspects of the model used; knowledge generated about patient work and benefits of using the models.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Our analysis revealed that a majority of studies were conducted in the United States, used qualitative or mixed methods and employed a variety of data collection techniques to study adult patient populations with chronic illness and their informal caregivers and healthcare providers performing patient work in the home and clinical setting. The studies resulted in a variety of useful products, demonstrating several benefits of using the models.

CONCLUSION

Our review has demonstrated the value of using the SEIPS family of work systems models to study and improve patient and family contributions to health-related work.

摘要

目的

展示基于人因工程学的患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)工作系统模型家族在研究和改善患者工作方面的应用及价值。

数据来源

我们对已发表的将SEIPS工作系统模型家族应用于患者工作的实证文献进行了综述。

研究选择

纳入的研究必须应用SEIPS工作系统模型家族中的一种来研究患者工作;发表于英文同行评审期刊且包含数据分析。我们确定了16篇符合纳入标准的文章。

数据提取

对于每项研究,我们提取了应用模型的环境和情况;研究设计;研究方法;使用的模型;研究参与者的类型和数量;研究目的;研究是否包括干预;所使用模型的具体方面;所产生的关于患者工作的知识以及使用这些模型的益处。

数据综合结果

我们的分析表明,大多数研究在美国进行,采用定性或混合方法,并运用多种数据收集技术来研究患有慢性病的成年患者群体及其非正式护理人员以及在家庭和临床环境中从事患者工作的医疗保健提供者。这些研究产生了各种有用的成果,证明了使用这些模型的若干益处。

结论

我们的综述证明了使用SEIPS工作系统模型家族来研究和改善患者及家庭对健康相关工作的贡献的价值。

相似文献

1
Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions.患者工作的人因工程学工作系统分析:科学现状与未来方向
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):60-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa099.
2
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.SEIPS 2.0:一种用于研究和改善医疗保健专业人员和患者工作的人因学框架。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.人因系统方法在医疗质量和患者安全中的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
5
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.探讨 SEIPS 2.0 模型在分析工作系统间的护理交接中的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.基于人因工程学(HFE)的医疗系统重新设计以提高医疗质量和患者安全的系统评价。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(1):33-49. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.959070. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Sociotechnical systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety.用于医疗质量和患者安全的社会技术系统方法。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1(0 1):3850-4. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0091-3850.
10
Adopting systems models for multiple incident analysis: utility and usability.采用系统模型进行多事件分析:实用性与可用性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab135.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Older Adults' Work on the Arduous Path to Spine Surgery.一项关于影响老年人在脊柱手术艰难道路上就医行为因素的定性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70850. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70850. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Leveraging Ergonomics and Human Factors (E/HF) for community impact: what have we learned about how to make a difference.利用人机工程学和人因学(E/HF)产生社区影响:我们对如何产生影响有哪些了解。
Ergonomics. 2025 Jan 16:1-19. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2025.2450726.
3
Home self-management of type 2 diabetes with diabetes technologies in northern France: a focused ethnographic study protocol.法国北部2型糖尿病患者借助糖尿病技术进行家庭自我管理:一项聚焦人种学研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 2;14(12):e084475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084475.
4
A Combined Telemedicine and Ambulatory Wound Care Team Intervention for Improving Cross-Sector Outpatient Chronic Wound Management: Protocol for the Mixed Methods TELE-AMBUS Research Project.联合远程医疗和门诊伤口护理团队干预以改善跨部门门诊慢性伤口管理:混合方法 TELE-AMBUS 研究项目方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 4;13:e55502. doi: 10.2196/55502.
5
Assessing patient work system factors for medication management during transition of care among older adults: an observational study.评估老年人护理过渡期间药物管理的患者工作系统因素:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Dec 13;34(1):8-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017297.
6
Occupational accidents and the use of PPE: a global meta-analysis.职业事故与个人防护装备使用:全球荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 21;12:1368991. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368991. eCollection 2024.
7
Macroergonomic components of the patient work system shaping dyadic care management during adolescence: a case study of type 1 diabetes.患者工作系统的宏观工效学成分在青少年时期对双元护理管理的影响:以 1 型糖尿病为例的案例研究。
Ergonomics. 2024 Nov;67(11):1575-1595. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2343942. Epub 2024 May 7.
8
Protocol for a scoping review of work system design in health care.卫生保健工作系统设计范围综述研究方案
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 30;12:21. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128913.2. eCollection 2023.
9
Receive, Sustain, and Flow: A simple heuristic for facilitating the identification and treatment of critically ill patients during their hospital journeys.接收、维持和流动:一种简单的启发式方法,可帮助在患者的医院旅程中识别和治疗重症患者。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 22;13:04139. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04139.
10
Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis.为什么产时电子胎儿监护的安全性如此难以保证?一项结合人因/工效学和社会科学分析的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Mar 25;33(4):246-256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review.患者工作及其背景:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e16656. doi: 10.2196/16656.
2
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.探讨 SEIPS 2.0 模型在分析工作系统间的护理交接中的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Patient ergonomics: 10-year mapping review of patient-centered human factors.患者工效学:以患者为中心的人体因素 10 年映射回顾。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102972. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102972. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Hazards from physical attributes of the home environment among patients on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.居家环境物理属性对门诊接受肠外抗菌药物治疗患者的危害。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Apr;47(4):425-430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
Uncovering the invisible patient work system through a case study of breast cancer self-management.通过乳腺癌自我管理的案例研究揭示无形的患者工作系统。
Ergonomics. 2018 Dec;61(12):1575-1590. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1503339. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Framework for Evaluating and Implementing Inpatient Portals: a Multi-stakeholder Perspective.评估和实施住院患者门户的框架:多利益相关者视角。
J Med Syst. 2018 Jul 16;42(9):158. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1009-3.
8
No one size fits all-the development of a theory-driven intervention to increase in-hospital mobility: the "WALK-FOR" study.没有一刀切的方法——制定理论驱动的干预措施以增加住院期间的活动量:“WALK-FOR”研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0778-3.
9
Home is where the head is: a distributed cognition account of personal health information management in the home among those with chronic illness.家是心之所在:慢性病患者在家中个人健康信息管理的分布式认知视角
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1065-1078. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1435910. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
10
An East-West comparison of self-care barriers in heart failure.东西方心力衰竭自我护理障碍的比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Oct;8(7):615-622. doi: 10.1177/2048872617744352. Epub 2017 Dec 28.