Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and SEIPS 2.0 models provide a framework for integrating Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) in health care quality and patient safety improvement. As care becomes increasingly distributed over space and time, the "process" component of the SEIPS model needs to evolve and represent this additional complexity. In this paper, we review different ways that the process component of the SEIPS models have been described and applied. We then propose the SEIPS 3.0 model, which expands the process component, using the concept of the patient journey to describe the spatio-temporal distribution of patients' interactions with multiple care settings over time. This new SEIPS 3.0 sociotechnical systems approach to the patient journey and patient safety poses several conceptual and methodological challenges to HFE researchers and professionals, including the need to consider multiple perspectives, issues with genuine participation, and HFE work at the boundaries.
系统工程促进患者安全倡议(SEIPS)和 SEIPS2.0 模型为将人为因素和工效学(HFE)整合到医疗保健质量和患者安全改进中提供了框架。随着医疗保健的分布越来越广泛,SEIPS 模型的“过程”组件需要发展并代表这种额外的复杂性。在本文中,我们回顾了 SEIPS 模型的过程组件的不同描述和应用方式。然后,我们提出了 SEIPS3.0 模型,该模型使用患者旅程的概念来描述患者与多个护理环境随时间的时空分布,从而扩展了过程组件。这种新的 SEIPS3.0 患者旅程和患者安全的社会技术系统方法对 HFE 研究人员和专业人员提出了一些概念和方法上的挑战,包括需要考虑多个视角、真正参与的问题以及边界处的 HFE 工作。