Suppr超能文献

手术手套比较:穿孔、满意度和手灵巧度。

Comparison of surgical gloves: perforation, satisfaction and manual dexterity.

机构信息

University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.

University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Jun;28(2):1160-1166. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1875636. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two different surgical gloves (powdered latex and powder and latex free) for glove perforation frequency, problems and satisfaction with glove usage and manual dexterity levels during surgical operations that include scrub nurses. Scrub nurses wore antiallergenic gloves (powder and latex free) gloves during three operations, double latex and powdered gloves during three operations and single latex and powdered gloves during three operations. The gloves were checked for punctures after each surgery with a water-inflation test. In our study, 19% of single gloves and 18.1 % of double gloves and 4.8% of powder and latex free worn by scrub nurses were punctured during surgery. None of the inner gloves in double gloves were punctured. Although wearing double gloves restricts manual dexterity, results in discomfort problems such as perspiration and fetor and results in a low satisfaction rate among scrub nurses, double gloves are protective against injuries and punctures.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种不同手术手套(有粉乳胶手套和无粉乳胶手套)在手术操作过程中(包括刷手护士)的手套穿孔频率、问题、对手套使用的满意度以及手灵巧度的有效性。刷手护士在三种手术中戴抗过敏手套(无粉乳胶手套),在三种手术中戴双乳胶和有粉手套,在三种手术中戴单乳胶和有粉手套。每次手术后,用充气水试验检查手套是否有穿孔。在我们的研究中,19%的单手套、18.1%的双手套和 4.8%的刷手护士使用的无粉乳胶手套在手术中穿孔。双手套的内手套均未穿孔。尽管戴双手套会限制手的灵巧度,导致出汗、有异味等不适问题,并导致刷手护士的满意度较低,但双手套可以防止受伤和穿孔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验