Suppr超能文献

双乳胶手套的穿孔率及外层工作手套在尸体解剖室的防护效果:一项遵循STROBE标准的研究。

Perforation rates in double latex gloves and protective effects of outer work gloves in a postmortem examination room: A STROBE-compliant study.

作者信息

Idota Nozomi, Nakamura Mami, Akasaka Yoshihisa, Tsuboi Hajime, Bando Risa, Ikegaya Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16348. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016348.

Abstract

Medical staff face the risk of exposure to blood-borne infectious agents during postmortem examinations. This study investigated the effectiveness of non-slip work gloves worn over 2 layers of surgical latex gloves (outer and inner gloves) as a means of reducing hand and finger injuries. Complete sets of outer and inner gloves worn during postmortem examinations were collected from participating forensic staff. Latex gloves were categorized into 2 groups based on the users' actions during the examination: the wearing group if the wearer wore their work gloves continuously without interruption, and the taking-off group if the wearer removed them at least once. Perforation rates, locations, and shapes were compared between these groups. Outer-glove perforation occurred significantly more often in the taking-off group (n = 102 pairs) than in the wearing group (n = 91 pairs) (30.4% vs 3.8%, P < .001). Inner-glove perforation occurred at rates of 2.0% and 0.5% (P = .38), respectively. The wearers did not incur hand or finger injuries. Perforation rates were similar between the dominant and non-dominant hands (P = .18). Regarding location, gloves were punctured most frequently at the thumb, followed by the index finger. Most examiners (85.6%) did not notice the perforation when the damage occurred. Therefore, we could not confirm that a specific operation within a set of plural operations affected the rate of perforation. Additionally, we could not prove a relationship between glove perforation and each operation performed with/without work gloves. The perforation appearances varied greatly in shape and size, suggesting multiple causes of perforation. The continuous (i.e., uninterrupted) wear of work gloves during postmortem examinations reduced the incidence of perforations in both latex glove layers and thus reduced the risk of hand and finger injury.

摘要

医务人员在尸体解剖检查过程中面临接触血源性病原体的风险。本研究调查了在两层手术乳胶手套(外层和内层手套)上佩戴防滑工作手套作为减少手部和手指损伤手段的有效性。从参与研究的法医工作人员那里收集了尸体解剖检查期间佩戴的外层和内层手套的完整套装。根据使用者在检查过程中的行为,乳胶手套被分为两组:如果佩戴者持续不间断地佩戴工作手套,则为佩戴组;如果佩戴者至少摘下一次手套,则为摘下组。比较了这两组之间的穿孔率、位置和形状。外层手套穿孔在摘下组(n = 102双)中比在佩戴组(n = 91双)中显著更频繁发生(30.4%对3.8%,P <.001)。内层手套穿孔发生率分别为2.0%和0.5%(P =.38)。佩戴者未发生手部或手指损伤。优势手和非优势手的穿孔率相似(P =.18)。关于位置,手套最常被刺破的部位是拇指,其次是食指。大多数检查人员(85.6%)在损伤发生时未注意到穿孔。因此,我们无法确认一组多项操作中的特定操作是否会影响穿孔率。此外,我们无法证明手套穿孔与佩戴/不佩戴工作手套进行的每项操作之间存在关联。穿孔外观在形状和大小上差异很大,表明穿孔有多种原因。在尸体解剖检查期间持续(即不间断)佩戴工作手套可降低两层乳胶手套的穿孔发生率,从而降低手部和手指受伤的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f5f/6635159/638638f1662c/medi-98-e16348-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.
3
Surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology: prevention with cut-resistant gloves.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jan;108(1):91-5. doi: 10.1177/019459989310800114.
4
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2.
5
Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex.
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Feb;12(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00006.
6
The protective effect of a cut-resistant glove liner. A prospective, randomised trial.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 May;80(3):411-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.8041.
8
Glove Perforation Rate in Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study To Evaluate the Efficacy of Double Gloving.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Aug;17(4):436-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.165. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Jun;268(2):82-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0343-2. Epub 2002 Aug 28.
10
Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training.
Can J Surg. 2022 Feb 8;65(1):E82-E88. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016720. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and Manufacture of Data Gloves for Rehabilitation Training and Gesture Recognition Based on Flexible Sensors.
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 7;2021:6359403. doi: 10.1155/2021/6359403. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Why were surgical gloves not used earlier?
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1234-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00271-8.
4
Glove failure in elective thyroid surgery: A prospective randomized study.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(3):499-505. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00428.
5
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 7;2014(3):CD009573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.pub2.
7
Scalpel safety in the operative setting: a systematic review.
Surgery. 2010 Jan;147(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
8
Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves.
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
9
Cut-resistant protective gloves in pathology--effective and cost-effective.
Virchows Arch. 2008 Mar;452(3):313-8. doi: 10.1007/s00428-008-0576-y.
10
X. The Operative Treatment of Fractures.
Ann Surg. 1909 Dec;50(6):1106-13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190912000-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验