University of Valencia, Spain.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP10148-NP10169. doi: 10.1177/0886260520985494. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
It has been suggested that intimate partner violence (IPV) against women perpetrators present emotional dysregulations when dealing with acute stress, which in turn could help to explain their proneness to violence. Emotional regulation can be objectively measured by means of psychophysiological parameters/variables/indicators of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, such as cardiorespiratory (heart rate [HR], pre-ejection period [PEP] and respiratory sinus arrythmia [RSA]) and electrodermal (skin conductance levels [SCL]) signals. Therefore, this study aims to assess whether IPV perpetrators ( = 107) present differential psychophysiological and psychological state changes when coping with an acute cognitive laboratory stressor (a set of cognitive tests performed in front of an expert committee) in comparison with nonviolent men ( = 87). Moreover, the study assesses whether psychological state variables foster the psychophysiological response to acute stress. Our results demonstrate that, compared to nonviolent controls, IPV perpetrators showed higher HR and SCL values, shorter PEP, and lower RSA values during recovery from stress. They also presented higher negative affect (i.e., more anger and worse mood) after stress. Thus, high baseline anger explained the increases in emotional arousal when measured as SCL increases. The present study contributes evidence showing that IPV perpetrators and nonviolent men cope differently with stress. These findings might help forensic science to identify characteristics of violent individuals to establish their therapeutic needs. Furthermore, it would be appropriate to combine psychophysiological measurements with self-reports, thus increasing the reliability of the assessment of violent individuals.
有人认为,亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的女性施害者在应对急性压力时会出现情绪失调,这反过来又可以帮助解释他们的暴力倾向。情绪调节可以通过自主神经系统(ANS)活动的心理生理参数/变量/指标来客观测量,例如心血管(心率[HR]、射前间期[PEP]和呼吸窦性心律失常[RSA])和皮肤电(皮肤电导水平[SCL])信号。因此,本研究旨在评估 IPV 施害者(= 107)在应对急性认知实验室应激源(一组在专家委员会面前进行的认知测试)时是否会出现不同的心理生理和心理状态变化,与非暴力男性(= 87)相比。此外,该研究还评估了心理状态变量是否促进了对急性应激的生理反应。我们的结果表明,与非暴力对照组相比,IPV 施害者在应激后恢复期间表现出更高的 HR 和 SCL 值、更短的 PEP 和更低的 RSA 值。他们在应激后也表现出更高的负性情绪(即更多的愤怒和更差的情绪)。因此,高基线愤怒解释了 SCL 增加时情绪唤醒的增加。本研究提供了证据表明,IPV 施害者和非暴力男性以不同的方式应对压力。这些发现可能有助于法医学识别暴力个体的特征,以确定他们的治疗需求。此外,将生理测量与自我报告相结合,从而提高对暴力个体评估的可靠性是合适的。