• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊室精神科评估的时间因素。

Temporal aspects of emergency room psychiatric evaluations.

作者信息

Wood K A, Khuri R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Tennessee, Memphis.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Mar;176(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198803000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-198803000-00004
PMID:3343589
Abstract

The use of emergency room time by medical and psychiatric clinicians evaluating psychiatric patients was studied. The amount of time to the completion of the medical and the psychiatric evaluation and the actual amount of time of the psychiatric evaluation were compared over demographic, admission, diagnostic, and referral factors. Evaluations were completed closer to admission with patients admitted during the day and evening shifts and with patients having more obvious psychiatric problems, i.e., brought involuntarily, with a known psychiatric history, given a psychotic diagnosis in the emergency room, or subsequently sent to a psychiatric hospital. Such factors failed to affect the actual length of the psychiatric evaluation. The multiple time pressures in an emergency room setting appeared to affect when, but not how long, clinicians evaluated psychiatric patients. The time that emergency room clinicians take to begin evaluations of psychiatric patients may reflect important observational data that affect their temporal, diagnostic, and recommended treatment patterns.

摘要

对评估精神科患者的医学和精神科临床医生使用急诊室时间的情况进行了研究。比较了完成医学评估和精神科评估所需的时间以及精神科评估的实际时间,涉及人口统计学、入院、诊断和转诊因素。对于白天和晚上班次入院的患者以及有更明显精神问题的患者,即非自愿入院、有已知精神病史、在急诊室被诊断为精神病或随后被送往精神病医院的患者,评估在更接近入院时完成。这些因素并未影响精神科评估的实际时长。急诊室环境中的多重时间压力似乎影响临床医生对精神科患者进行评估的时间,而非评估时长。急诊室临床医生开始评估精神科患者的时间可能反映出影响其时间、诊断和推荐治疗模式的重要观察数据。

相似文献

1
Temporal aspects of emergency room psychiatric evaluations.急诊室精神科评估的时间因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Mar;176(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198803000-00004.
2
Differential use of admission status in a psychiatric emergency room.精神科急诊室入院状态的差异使用情况。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(4):595-606.
3
Emergency room dispositions of professionally referred psychiatric patients.专业转诊精神科患者的急诊室处置情况。
Psychiatr Q. 1988 Fall;59(3):225-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01064245.
4
[Characteristics of patients who received an indication of involuntary admission, with or without the involvement of a third party, in a Parisian psychiatric emergency unit].[在巴黎一家精神科急诊室接受非自愿住院指征的患者特征,无论是否有第三方介入]
Encephale. 2019 Nov;45(5):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Admission decisions following contact with an emergency mental health assessment and intervention service.在与紧急心理健康评估和干预服务机构接触后做出的入院决定。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01302.x.
6
Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. III. Disposition as a function of mental disorder and dangerousness indicators.精神科急诊室中的民事住院治疗。三、作为精神障碍和危险性指标函数的处置情况。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):759-63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320075010.
7
The role of diagnosis in a psychiatric emergency setting.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 Jul;35(7):715-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.7.715.
8
Factors associated with involuntary return to a psychiatric emergency service within 12 months.与12个月内非自愿重返精神科急诊服务相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Sep;49(9):1212-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.9.1212.
9
A method for understanding admission decision making in a psychiatric emergency room.一种理解精神科急诊室收治决策过程的方法。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1055-60. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1055.
10
Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. I. The assessment of dangerousness by emergency room clinicians.精神科急诊室中的民事住院治疗。一、急诊室临床医生对危险性的评估。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):748-52. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320064008.