Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌患者近距离治疗期间,锥形束计算机断层扫描与传统计算机断层扫描图像之间配准的准确性以及RaySearch软件中膀胱剂量映射方法。

Accuracy of registrations between cone-beam computed tomography and conventional computed tomography images and dose mapping methods in RaySearch software for the bladder during brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients.

作者信息

Czajkowski Paweł, Zwierzchowski Grzegorz, Piotrowski Tomasz

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Gdynia Oncology Centre, Gdynia, Poland.

Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Dec;12(6):593-600. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101693. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess selected methods of image registration available in the RaySearch software and their impact on the accuracy of mapping of doses deposited in the bladder during brachytherapy (BRT) of cervical cancer in images used during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was based on data from ten patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (BRT) were aligned with CT images (EBRT) using four registration methods: Reg_1 (rigid), Reg_2a, Reg_2b (hybrid), and Reg_3 (biomechanical). Image mapping accuracy was evaluated based on bladder's anatomy. Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC) values were analyzed for all the registrations. Discrepancies between triangular mesh points set on the basis of bladder contours were analyzed. Dose distributions from BRT were transformed according to registration results and mapped on CT images. Original BRT doses deposited in 2 cm volume of the bladder were compared to those transformed and associated with bladder's volume determined on CT images.

RESULTS

Mean DSC values amounted to 0.36 (Reg_1), 0.87 and 0.88 (Reg_2a and Reg_2b), and 0.97 (Reg_3). Significant differences were found between DSC for the following comparisons: Reg_3/Reg_1 ( = 0.001), Reg_2a/Reg_1 ( = 0.011), and Reg_2b/Reg_1 ( = 0.014). The lowest discrepancies between triangular mesh points were for Reg_3 ( < 0.001, Reg_3 vs. Reg_1, and = 0.039, Reg_3 vs. Reg_2b). Finally, the lowest discrepancies between the original and transformed doses were found for Reg_3. Nevertheless, only 5 out of 10 observations for Reg_3 yielded error of less than 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical registration (Reg_3) enabled the most accurate alignment between CBCT and CT images. Satisfactory registration results of anatomical structures do not guarantee a correct mapping of primary BRT doses on the bladder delineated on CT images during EBRT. The results of dose transformation based on biomechanical registration had an error of less than 5% for only 50% of the observations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估RaySearch软件中可用的选定图像配准方法,以及它们对外照射放疗(EBRT)期间使用的图像中宫颈癌近距离放疗(BRT)时膀胱内沉积剂量映射准确性的影响。

材料与方法

本研究基于10例患者的数据。使用四种配准方法将锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像(BRT)与CT图像(EBRT)对齐:Reg_1(刚性)、Reg_2a、Reg_2b(混合)和Reg_3(生物力学)。基于膀胱解剖结构评估图像映射准确性。分析了所有配准的 Sørensen-Dice 系数(DSC)值。分析了基于膀胱轮廓设置的三角形网格点之间的差异。根据配准结果转换BRT的剂量分布,并映射到CT图像上。将BRT在膀胱2 cm体积内沉积的原始剂量与转换后的剂量以及与CT图像上确定的膀胱体积相关的剂量进行比较。

结果

平均DSC值分别为0.36(Reg_1)、0.87和0.88(Reg_2a和Reg_2b)以及0.97(Reg_3)。在以下比较的DSC之间发现了显著差异:Reg_3/Reg_1( = 0.001)、Reg_2a/Reg_1( = 0.011)和Reg_2b/Reg_1( = 0.014)。三角形网格点之间差异最小的是Reg_3( < 0.001,Reg_3与Reg_1比较,以及 = 0.039,Reg_3与Reg_2b比较)。最后,Reg_3的原始剂量与转换剂量之间的差异最小。然而,Reg_3的10次观察中只有5次误差小于5%。

结论

生物力学配准(Reg_3)能够实现CBCT与CT图像之间最准确的对齐。解剖结构的满意配准结果并不能保证在EBRT期间将BRT的原始剂量正确映射到CT图像上描绘的膀胱上。基于生物力学配准的剂量转换结果仅在50%的观察中误差小于5%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19b/7787205/99507b0f6068/JCB-12-42682-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验