Rizk Hoda Ibrahim, Elkholy Monira Mahmoud, Barakat Abeer Abdou, Elsayed Raghda Mostafa Mostafa, Abd El Fatah Shaimaa A M
Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 12 Manial Street, Cairo, Egypt.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2021 Jan 13;96(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42506-020-00062-x.
Equitable access to essential medicines of maintained efficacy, safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness must be ensured by a well-functioning health system. This study aims to identify the determinants of patients' access to medicines at the primary health care (PHC) level from the perspectives of various (internal and external) stakeholders of the pharmaceutical system.
The study employed both quantitative and qualitative components. Quantitative component applied a descriptive a cross-sectional design and qualitative component applied an in-depth interview design. It was a health system research conducted at two (PHC) facilities (one urban and the other rural) in Egypt. It inquired upon political, economic, and managerial aspects of the pharmaceutical system utilizing the "Health System Assessment Approach: a How-To Manual" and the "WHO operational package for assessing, monitoring and evaluating country pharmaceutical situations."
Analysis of the quantitative data extracted from the cross-sectional component with external stakeholders (patients) revealed that about one-third of patients in both facilities were unable to pay for the medicine. Patients in both settings took less than an hour to reach the PHC facility. The Percent of patients who believe that the private pharmacies' medicine is better than the PHC one was significantly higher in rural than urban group (24% and 10% respectively) and the percent of medicines dispensed was 50% and 66.7% in rural and urban groups respectively. Analysis of the qualitative data extracted from in-depth interviews with internal stakeholders (key informants from regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical industry, academia, pharmacists, and physicians) were summarized utilizing Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Challenges (SWOC) analysis approach. Various viewpoints toward the determinants of patients' access to medicines were disclosed.
The Percent of medicines dispensed was insufficient in both rural and urban facilities. There is a need to invest in building trust in generic medicine quality in the government health facilities focusing on improving medicine availability and ensuring enough amounts of high-quality drugs. Although there are drug committees in the two studied PHC facilities for demonstrating the prescribing and dispensing policies, yet the system required to enforce these policies is still deficient.
一个运转良好的卫生系统必须确保人们能够公平获取疗效、安全性、质量和成本效益均达标的基本药物。本研究旨在从药品系统的不同(内部和外部)利益相关者的角度,确定初级卫生保健(PHC)层面患者获取药品的决定因素。
该研究采用了定量和定性两个部分。定量部分采用描述性横断面设计,定性部分采用深入访谈设计。这是一项在埃及的两个初级卫生保健机构(一个城市机构和一个农村机构)开展的卫生系统研究。它利用“卫生系统评估方法:操作手册”和“世卫组织评估、监测和评价国家药品状况的操作包”,对药品系统的政治、经济和管理方面进行了调查。
对从横断面部分与外部利益相关者(患者)提取的定量数据的分析显示,两个机构中约三分之一的患者无力支付药品费用。两个地区的患者到达初级卫生保健机构的时间均不到一小时。认为私人药店药品比初级卫生保健机构药品更好的患者比例,农村地区显著高于城市地区(分别为24%和10%),农村和城市地区的药品配给比例分别为50%和66.7%。对与内部利益相关者(来自监管机构、制药行业、学术界、药剂师和医生的关键信息提供者)进行深入访谈所提取的定性数据的分析,采用优势-劣势-机会-挑战(SWOC)分析方法进行了总结。揭示了对患者获取药品决定因素的各种观点。
农村和城市机构的药品配给比例均不足。有必要投资于在政府卫生机构中建立对仿制药质量的信任,重点是提高药品可及性并确保有足够数量的高质量药品。尽管在所研究的两个初级卫生保健机构中有药品委员会来展示处方和配药政策,但执行这些政策所需的系统仍然存在缺陷。