• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[边缘型人格障碍冲动与情绪调节失调量表(IED - 27)的聚合效度和因子效度]

[Convergent and Factorial Validity of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IED-27) for Borderline Personality Disorder].

作者信息

Dreyße Kathrin, Zöllner Elena, Behrens Carolin, Armbrust Michael, Kröger Christoph

机构信息

Psychosomatische Klinik und Psychotherapie, Schön Klinik Bad Bramstedt, Deutschland.

Institut fur Psychologie, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Hildesheim, Deutschland.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 May;71(5):177-184. doi: 10.1055/a-1322-3334. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1055/a-1322-3334
PMID:33440448
Abstract

There is a growing consensus that emotion dysregulation is the defining feature of borderline personality disorder, but there are also persisting competing views on the pathology and dimensional structure of the disorder. The "Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale" (IED-27) is already being used for assessing patients with borderline personality disorder. The particular aim of this study was to gain evidence of the dimensional structure of the disorder by confirmatory factorial analysis. A heterogeneous sample of patients with borderline personality disorder (n=484), attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder (n=191) and eating disorders (n=197) of a psychosomatic clinic were given general and specific self-assessment inventories via computer-assisted testing system, including the IED-27. Results showed a bifactor model with a general factor and three specific factors: "emotional dysregulation", "relationship difficulties" and "self-injuries and suicidal behaviours", to be the model with the best fit (ΔCFI=0,032). The internal consistency of the sample seems to be good (ω=0,83-0,93) and expected correlations to similar subscales could be proved. Good psychometric criteria of the IED-27 were replicated in this study. Prospectively, the subscales allow a more detailed representation and specific treatment planning.

摘要

越来越多的人达成共识,即情绪调节障碍是边缘型人格障碍的决定性特征,但对于该障碍的病理学和维度结构也存在持续的不同观点。“冲动性和情绪调节障碍量表”(IED - 27)已被用于评估边缘型人格障碍患者。本研究的特定目的是通过验证性因素分析获得该障碍维度结构的证据。通过计算机辅助测试系统,向一家身心诊所的边缘型人格障碍患者(n = 484)、注意力缺陷(多动)障碍患者(n = 191)和饮食失调患者(n = 197)的异质样本发放了一般和特定的自我评估量表,包括IED - 27。结果显示,具有一个一般因素和三个特定因素的双因素模型:“情绪调节障碍”、“人际关系困难”和“自我伤害及自杀行为”,是拟合度最佳的模型(ΔCFI = 0.032)。样本的内部一致性似乎良好(ω = 0.83 - 0.93),并且可以证明与类似子量表的预期相关性。本研究重复了IED - 27良好的心理测量标准。前瞻性地看,这些子量表允许更详细的描述和具体的治疗计划。

相似文献

1
[Convergent and Factorial Validity of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IED-27) for Borderline Personality Disorder].[边缘型人格障碍冲动与情绪调节失调量表(IED - 27)的聚合效度和因子效度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 May;71(5):177-184. doi: 10.1055/a-1322-3334. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
[Factorial and Convergent Validity of the Short Form of the "Questionnaire of Thoughts and Feelings" (QTF-14) for Borderline Personality Disorder].
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2024 Jan;74(1):43-48. doi: 10.1055/a-2177-1676. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Emotion dysregulation and impulsivity additively predict borderline personality disorder features in Italian nonclinical adolescents.情绪调节障碍和冲动性可相加预测意大利非临床青少年的边缘型人格障碍特征。
Personal Ment Health. 2013 Nov;7(4):320-33. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1229. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
A Comparison of Self-Reported Emotional Regulation Skills in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder.成人注意缺陷多动障碍与边缘型人格障碍的自我报告情绪调节技能比较。
J Atten Disord. 2019 Oct;23(12):1396-1406. doi: 10.1177/1087054717698814. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
5
Dimensions of Impulsivity in Healthy People, Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder, and Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.健康人群、边缘型人格障碍患者和注意缺陷多动障碍患者的冲动维度。
J Atten Disord. 2021 Feb;25(4):584-595. doi: 10.1177/1087054718822121. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in participants with personality disorders.人格障碍患者情绪调节问卷的验证性因子分析和心理测量特性。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Nov;28(6):1598-1606. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2605. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
8
[Transdiagnostic study of impulsivity dimensions. Comparative analysis of impulsivity profiles in adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder].[冲动性维度的跨诊断研究。成人注意缺陷多动障碍和边缘型人格障碍中冲动性特征的比较分析]
Psychiatr Hung. 2020;35(2):136-145.
9
Aggressive behavior and self-harm in Borderline Personality Disorder: The role of impulsivity and emotion dysregulation in a sample of outpatients.边缘型人格障碍中的攻击行为和自残:冲动和情绪调节障碍在门诊患者样本中的作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Mar;249:321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Self-rated impulsivity in healthy individuals, substance use disorder and ADHD: psychometric properties of the Swedish Barratt impulsiveness scale.健康个体的自我评定冲动性、物质使用障碍和 ADHD:瑞典巴瑞特冲动性量表的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03462-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement invariance on two self-report instruments for men and women with borderline personality disorder.两种用于边缘型人格障碍男性和女性的自我报告工具的测量不变性。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 May 12;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00296-1.
2
Identification of Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescents: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Efficiency of a Juvenile Version of the Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Scale (IES-27-J).青少年边缘型人格障碍的识别:冲动与情绪失调量表青少年版(IES-27-J)的心理测量特性及诊断效能
J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jul;81(7):567-576. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23792. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Executive functions and borderline personality features in adolescents with major depressive disorder.
患有重度抑郁症的青少年的执行功能和边缘型人格特征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 22;17:957753. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.957753. eCollection 2023.