• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌的预诊断途径:从首次就诊到专科转诊。

Lung Cancer Pre-Diagnostic Pathways from First Presentation to Specialist Referral.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1, Canada.

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 11;28(1):378-389. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010040.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol28010040
PMID:33440696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7903286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage with high associated mortality. Timely diagnosis depends on timely referral to a respiratory specialist; however, in Canada, little is known about how patients move through primary care to get to a respiratory specialist. Accordingly, we aimed to identify and describe lung cancer pre-diagnostic pathways in primary care from first presentation to referral.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with primary lung cancer were recruited using consecutive sampling ( = 50) from a lung cancer center in Montréal, Québec. Data on healthcare service utilization in primary care were collected from chart reviews and structured patient interviews and analyzed using latent class analysis to identify groups of patients with similar pre-diagnostic pathways. Each group was described based on patient- and tumor-related characteristics and the sequence of utilization activities.

RESULTS

68% of the patients followed a pathway where family physician (FP) visits were dominant ("FP-centric") and 32% followed a pathway where walk-in clinic and emergency department (ED) visits were dominant ("ED-centric"). Time to referral in the FP group was double that of the ED group (45 days (IQR: 12-111) vs. 22 (IQR: 5-69)) with more advanced disease (65% vs. 50%). In the FP group, 29% of the patients saw their FP three times or more before being referred and 41% had an ED visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may reflect the challenge of diagnosing lung cancer in primary care, missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis, and a lack of integration between primary and specialist care.

摘要

背景

肺癌通常在晚期诊断,死亡率较高。及时诊断取决于及时转介给呼吸科专家;然而,在加拿大,人们对患者如何通过初级保健转至呼吸科专家知之甚少。因此,我们旨在确定并描述初级保健中从首次就诊到转介的肺癌预诊断途径。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,从魁北克省蒙特利尔的肺癌中心连续抽样(n=50)招募了原发性肺癌患者。通过病历回顾和结构化患者访谈收集初级保健中医疗服务利用的数据,并使用潜在类别分析来识别具有相似预诊断途径的患者群体。根据患者和肿瘤相关特征以及利用活动的顺序描述每个群体。

结果

68%的患者遵循以家庭医生就诊为主的途径(“以家庭医生为中心”),32%的患者遵循以就诊诊所和急诊就诊为主的途径(“以急诊为中心”)。家庭医生组的转诊时间是急诊组的两倍(45 天(IQR:12-111)比 22 天(IQR:5-69)),且疾病更为晚期(65%比 50%)。在家庭医生组中,29%的患者在转介前看了家庭医生三次或更多次,41%的患者去过急诊。

结论

我们的发现可能反映了在初级保健中诊断肺癌的挑战、错失早期诊断的机会以及初级保健和专科保健之间缺乏整合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/0a0682fbbeaf/curroncol-28-00040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/69c0629c64b7/curroncol-28-00040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/5a4ad3c540ef/curroncol-28-00040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/cd3152f3ef98/curroncol-28-00040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/77c9cee135b5/curroncol-28-00040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/578325111724/curroncol-28-00040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/0a0682fbbeaf/curroncol-28-00040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/69c0629c64b7/curroncol-28-00040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/5a4ad3c540ef/curroncol-28-00040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/cd3152f3ef98/curroncol-28-00040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/77c9cee135b5/curroncol-28-00040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/578325111724/curroncol-28-00040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b237/7903286/0a0682fbbeaf/curroncol-28-00040-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Lung Cancer Pre-Diagnostic Pathways from First Presentation to Specialist Referral.肺癌的预诊断途径:从首次就诊到专科转诊。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 11;28(1):378-389. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010040.
2
Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning.加强急诊科性活跃青春期女性转诊至计划生育部门的工作。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;24(4):324-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4994.
3
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
4
Patient perceptions of barriers to the early diagnosis of lung cancer and advice for health service improvement.患者对肺癌早期诊断障碍的认知及对改善卫生服务的建议。
Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):436-44. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt001. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.肺癌诊断和治疗的延迟。
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2282-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2282.
6
Pathways to Lung Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Patients and General Practitioners about Diagnostic and Pretreatment Intervals.肺癌诊断途径:一项关于诊断和治疗前间隔的患者和全科医生的定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):742-753. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-817OC.
7
Lung cancer patients in New Zealand initially present to secondary care through the emergency department rather than by referral to a respiratory specialist.新西兰的肺癌患者最初是通过急诊科前往二级医疗机构就诊,而非由呼吸专科医生转诊。
N Z Med J. 2009 May 8;122(1294):33-41.
8
Timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in a rapid outpatient diagnostic program with combined 18FDG-PET and contrast enhanced CT scanning.肺癌诊断和治疗的及时性在一个快速门诊诊断计划中,结合了 18FDG-PET 和对比增强 CT 扫描。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Mar;75(3):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.08.017. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
Retrospective review of patients with lung cancer identified in the emergency department.对在急诊科确诊的肺癌患者进行回顾性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:394-398. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.040. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Ethnicity as a risk factor for consultations in primary health care and out-patient care.种族作为初级卫生保健和门诊咨询的一个风险因素。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1993 Sep;11(3):169-73. doi: 10.3109/02813439308994825.

本文引用的文献

1
Transforming the specialist referral and consultation process in Canada.变革加拿大的专科转诊及会诊流程。
CMAJ. 2019 Apr 15;191(15):E408-E409. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181550.
2
Lung cancer survival among never smokers.不吸烟者肺癌存活率。
Cancer Lett. 2019 Jun 1;451:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
Patterns of care and emergency presentations for people with non-small cell lung cancer in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州非小细胞肺癌患者的护理模式和急诊就诊情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Aug;122:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
4
Impact of rapid investigation clinic on timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.快速调查门诊对肺癌诊断和治疗及时性的影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0504-5.
5
Lung cancer care trajectory at a Canadian centre: an evaluation of how wait times affect clinical outcomes.加拿大某中心的肺癌护理轨迹:对等待时间如何影响临床结果的评估。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):302-309. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3611. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
Recruiting newly referred lung cancer patients to a patient navigator intervention (PACO): lessons learnt from a pilot study.招募新转诊的肺癌患者参加患者导航干预项目(PACO):一项试点研究的经验教训。
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):335-341. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267871. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
7
It takes a team: CanIMPACT: Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care along the Continuum.这需要一个团队:加拿大改善连续性社区癌症护理团队(CanIMPACT)。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):781-782.
8
Evidence-practice gaps in lung cancer: A scoping review.肺癌领域证据与实践的差距:一项范围综述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12588. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12588. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
The expanding role of primary care in cancer control.初级保健在癌症控制中的作用不断扩大。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(12):1231-72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3.
10
Empirical evidence of recall bias for primary health care visits.初级卫生保健就诊回忆偏倚的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 15;15:381. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1039-1.