• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗的质量调整生命年排行榜:一种优化资源分配的实用方法。

QALY league table of Iran: a practical method for better resource allocation.

作者信息

Hashempour Reza, Raei Behzad, Safaei Lari Majid, Abolhasanbeigi Gallezan Nasrin, AkbariSari Ali

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 0000-0002-2043-8451, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jan 13;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00256-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12962-020-00256-2
PMID:33441153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7807517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The limited health care resources cannot meet all the demands of the society. Thus, decision makers have to choose feasible interventions and reject the others. We aimed to collect and summarize the results of all cost utility analysis studies that were conducted in Iran and develop a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) league table.

METHODS

A systematic mapping review was conducted to identify all cost utility analysis studies done in Iran and then map them in a table. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, as well as Iranian databases like Iran Medex, SID, Magiran, and Barakat Knowledge Network System were all searched for articles published from the inception of the databases to January 2020. Additionally, Cost per QALY or Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR) were collected from all studies. The Joanna Briggs checklist was used to assess quality appraisal.

RESULTS

In total, 51 cost-utility studies were included in the final analysis, out of which 14 studies were on cancer, six studies on coronary heart diseases. Two studies, each on hemophilia, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. The rest were on various other diseases. Markov model was the commonest one which has been applied to in 45% of the reviewed studies. Discount rates ranged from zero to 7.2%. The cost per QALY ranged from $ 0.144 in radiography costs for patients with some orthopedic problems to $ 4,551,521 for immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy in hemophilia patients. High heterogeneity was revealed; therefore, it would be biased to rank interventions based on reported cost per QALY or ICUR.

CONCLUSIONS

However, it is instructive and informative to collect all economic evaluation studies and summarize them in a table. The information on the table would in turn be used to redirect resources for efficient allocation. in general, it was revealed that preventive programs are cost effective interventions from different perspectives in Iran.

摘要

背景

有限的医疗保健资源无法满足社会的所有需求。因此,决策者必须选择可行的干预措施并拒绝其他措施。我们旨在收集和总结在伊朗进行的所有成本效用分析研究的结果,并编制一份质量调整生命年(QALY)排行榜。

方法

进行了一项系统的映射综述,以识别在伊朗进行的所有成本效用分析研究,然后将它们列入表格。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网,以及伊朗的数据库如Iran Medex、SID、Magiran和巴拉卡特知识网络系统,以查找从数据库建立到2020年1月发表的文章。此外,从所有研究中收集了每QALY成本或增量成本效用比(ICUR)。使用乔安娜·布里格斯检查表来评估质量评估。

结果

最终分析共纳入51项成本效用研究,其中14项研究涉及癌症,6项研究涉及冠心病。两项研究分别涉及血友病、多发性硬化症和类风湿性关节炎。其余研究涉及各种其他疾病。马尔可夫模型是最常用的模型,在45%的综述研究中得到应用。贴现率从零到7.2%不等。每QALY成本从一些骨科问题患者的放射照相成本中的0.144美元到血友病患者免疫耐受诱导(ITI)治疗中的4,551,521美元不等。显示出高度的异质性;因此,根据报告的每QALY成本或ICUR对干预措施进行排名会有偏差。

结论

然而,收集所有经济评估研究并将它们汇总在一个表格中是有指导意义和信息价值的。表格中的信息反过来可用于重新分配资源以实现有效配置。总体而言,结果显示预防性项目从不同角度来看都是伊朗具有成本效益的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc5/7807517/9802e29e6151/12962_2020_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc5/7807517/9802e29e6151/12962_2020_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc5/7807517/9802e29e6151/12962_2020_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
QALY league table of Iran: a practical method for better resource allocation.伊朗的质量调整生命年排行榜:一种优化资源分配的实用方法。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jan 13;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00256-2.
2
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
3
Comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence for health policy decisions in India.综合效用成本比排行榜:印度卫生政策决策成本效益证据的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;10:831254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831254. eCollection 2022.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
5
Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran.伊朗对甲型血友病高滴度抑制物患者采用免疫耐受诱导疗法与按需使用重组凝血因子VII治疗的成本效用分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:207-12. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S25909. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin: systematic review and economic evaluation.脊髓刺激治疗神经性或缺血性起源的慢性疼痛:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Mar;13(17):iii, ix-x, 1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta13170.
7
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
8
Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country.能否将成本效益结果合并为一个连贯的排行榜?来自一个高收入国家的案例研究。
Popul Health Metr. 2019 Aug 5;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x.
9
Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation.儿童和青少年肾移植的免疫抑制治疗:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Aug;20(61):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta20610.
10
The safety and effectiveness of different methods of earwax removal: a systematic review and economic evaluation.不同的耳垢清除方法的安全性和有效性:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(28):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta14280.

引用本文的文献

1
Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in HER2-positive gastric cancer treatment in Iran: a cost-effectiveness analysis.曲妥珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗伊朗HER2阳性胃癌的成本效益分析
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Nov 9;14(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00571-x.
2
Comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence for health policy decisions in India.综合效用成本比排行榜:印度卫生政策决策成本效益证据的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;10:831254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831254. eCollection 2022.
3
Economic evaluation of medical versus surgical strategies for first trimester therapeutic abortion: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Topiramate versus Phenobarbital in the Treatment of Children with Febrile Seizure.托吡酯与苯巴比妥治疗小儿热性惊厥的成本效益分析
Iran J Child Neurol. 2019 Fall;13(4):109-120.
2
Teriparatide in the Treatment of Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.特立帕肽治疗重度绝经后骨质疏松症:成本效用分析
Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Spring;18(2):1073-1085. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2019.1100679.
3
Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran.
孕早期治疗性流产的药物与手术策略的经济学评估:一项系统评价。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 30;11:184. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1274_21. eCollection 2022.
芬戈莫德与那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的比较:伊朗的成本效益和成本效用研究
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):297-305. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1560750. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab and natalizumab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment in Iran: decision analysis based on an indirect comparison.在伊朗,用阿仑单抗和那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益:基于间接比较的决策分析。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):71-84. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1543189. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Comparison of the Cost-utility Analysis of Electroacupuncture and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.电针与非甾体抗炎药治疗慢性下腰痛的成本-效用分析比较
J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2018 Apr;11(2):62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future.成本效益阈值:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):509-522. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0606-1.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment Centers in Prevention of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.美沙酮维持治疗中心在预防人类免疫缺陷病毒感染方面的成本效益
Addict Health. 2017 Apr;9(2):81-87.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke in Iran.伊朗急性缺血性卒中组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Mar;21(3):282-287. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1401545. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Ranking 93 health interventions for low- and middle-income countries by cost-effectiveness.按成本效益对低收入和中等收入国家的93项卫生干预措施进行排名。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182951. eCollection 2017.
10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran.阿司匹林在伊朗具有平均心血管疾病风险男性群体中对心肌梗死进行一级预防的成本效益评估。
Res Pharm Sci. 2017 Apr;12(2):144-153. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.202453.