Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;32(4):973-981. doi: 10.1111/jce.14885. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
The creation of effective and permanent lesions is a crucial factor in determining the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. By increasing the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) energy-mediated lesion formation, half-normal saline (HNS) as an irrigant for open-irrigated ablation catheters has the potential to reduce procedural times and improve acute and long-term outcomes.
This is a double-blind randomized clinical trial of 99 patients undergoing first-time RF catheter ablation for AF. Patients enrolled were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to perform ablation using HNS or normal saline (NS) as an irrigant for the ablation catheter.
The use of HNS is associated with shorter RF times (26 vs. 33 min; p = .02) with comparable procedure times (104 vs. 104 min). The rate of acute pulmonary vein reconnections (16% vs. 18%) was comparable, with a median of 1 vein reconnection in the HNS arm versus 2 in the NS arm. There was no difference in procedure-related complications, including the incidence of postprocedural hyponatremia when using HNS. Over the 1-year follow-up, there is no significant difference between the HNS and NS with respect to the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia (off antiarrhythmic drugs [AAD]: 47% vs. 52%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-2.06; off/on AAD: 66% vs. 66%, HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.53-2.12), with a potential benefit of using HNS when considering the paroxysmal AF cohort (on/off AAD 73% vs. 62%, HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.19-2.70).
In a mixed cohort of patients undergoing first-time AF ablation, irrigation of open-irrigated RF ablation catheters with HNS is associated with shorter RF times, with a comparably low rate of procedure-related complications. In the long term, there is no significant difference with respect to the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia. Larger studies with a more homogeneous population are necessary to determine whether HNS improves clinical outcomes.
在确定心房颤动(AF)消融的成功率方面,创建有效且持久的病变是一个关键因素。通过提高射频(RF)能量介导的病变形成的效果,半生理盐水(HNS)作为开放式灌流消融导管的灌流液有可能减少手术时间并改善急性和长期结果。
这是一项 99 例首次接受 RF 导管消融治疗 AF 的患者的双盲随机临床试验。将入组患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配,使用 HNS 或生理盐水(NS)作为消融导管的灌流液进行消融。
使用 HNS 与较短的 RF 时间相关(26 分钟 vs. 33 分钟;p=0.02),手术时间相当(104 分钟 vs. 104 分钟)。急性肺静脉再连接率(16% vs. 18%)相似,HNS 组中有 1 条静脉再连接,NS 组中有 2 条静脉再连接。在与手术相关的并发症方面,包括使用 HNS 时发生的术后低钠血症的发生率,没有差异。在 1 年的随访中,在任何房性心律失常(停用抗心律失常药物[AAD]:47% vs. 52%;风险比[HR]:1.17,95%置信区间[CI]:0.66-2.06;用/不用 AAD:66% vs. 66%,HR:1.06,95% CI:0.53-2.12)方面,HNS 与 NS 之间没有显著差异,当考虑阵发性 AF 队列时,使用 HNS 具有潜在益处(用/不用 AAD 73% vs. 62%,HR:0.72,95% CI:0.19-2.70)。
在首次接受 AF 消融的混合患者队列中,用 HNS 灌流开放式灌流 RF 消融导管与较短的 RF 时间相关,具有类似低的手术相关并发症发生率。从长远来看,在任何房性心律失常的复发方面没有显著差异。需要更大的、人群更同质的研究来确定 HNS 是否改善临床结局。