• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始血运重建与最佳药物治疗对慢性冠状动脉综合征伴心肌缺血患者的死亡和心肌梗死影响的系统评价和荟萃分析:来自当代随机对照试验的研究。

Death and Myocardial Infarction Following Initial Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndromes With Myocardial Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO.

Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):e019114. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019114. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.019114
PMID:33442990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7955292/
Abstract

Background In chronic coronary syndromes, myocardial ischemia is associated with a greater risk of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to compare the effect of initial revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) with OMT alone in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and myocardial ischemia on long-term death and nonfatal MI. Methods and Results Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of PCI or CABG plus OMT versus OMT alone for patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Studies were screened and data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Random-effects models were used to generate pooled treatment effects. The search yielded 7 randomized controlled trials that randomized 10 797 patients. Median follow-up was 5 years. Death occurred in 640 of the 5413 patients (11.8%) randomized to revascularization and in 647 of the 5384 patients (12%) randomized to OMT (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09; =0.60). Nonfatal MI was reported in 554 of 5413 patients (10.2%) in the revascularization arms compared with 627 of 5384 patients (11.6%) in the OMT arms (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.99; =0.04). In subgroup analysis, nonfatal MI was significantly reduced by CABG (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.59; <0.001) but was not reduced by PCI (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75-1.13; =0.43) (-interaction <0.001). Conclusions In patients with chronic coronary syndromes and myocardial ischemia, initial revascularization with PCI or CABG plus OMT did not reduce long-term mortality compared with OMT alone. CABG plus OMT reduced nonfatal MI compared with OMT alone, whereas PCI did not.

摘要

背景

在慢性冠状动脉综合征中,心肌缺血与死亡和非致死性心肌梗死(MI)的风险增加相关。我们旨在比较初始血运重建(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 [PCI] 或冠状动脉旁路移植术 [CABG] 加最佳药物治疗 [OMT])与单独 OMT 对慢性冠状动脉综合征合并心肌缺血患者的长期死亡和非致死性 MI 的影响。

方法和结果

检索了 Ovid Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以寻找 PCI 或 CABG 加 OMT 与单独 OMT 治疗慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机对照试验。由两位作者独立筛选研究和提取数据。采用随机效应模型生成汇总治疗效果。检索结果产生了 7 项随机对照试验,共纳入 10797 名患者。中位随访时间为 5 年。640 名(11.8%)接受血运重建治疗的患者和 647 名(12%)接受 OMT 治疗的患者发生死亡(比值比 [OR],0.97;95%置信区间 [CI],0.86-1.09;=0.60)。5413 名接受血运重建治疗的患者中有 554 名(10.2%)发生非致死性 MI,5384 名接受 OMT 治疗的患者中有 627 名(11.6%)发生非致死性 MI(OR,0.75;95%CI,0.57-0.99;=0.04)。亚组分析显示,CABG 显著降低非致死性 MI 的发生率(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.21-0.59;<0.001),但 PCI 无此作用(OR,0.92;95%CI,0.75-1.13;=0.43)(交互检验<0.001)。

结论

在慢性冠状动脉综合征合并心肌缺血患者中,与单独 OMT 相比,初始 PCI 或 CABG 加 OMT 治疗并未降低长期死亡率。CABG 加 OMT 治疗可降低非致死性 MI 的发生率,而 PCI 则无此作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/122900769133/JAH3-10-e019114-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/8f5e22983991/JAH3-10-e019114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/5f512378c1c6/JAH3-10-e019114-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/122900769133/JAH3-10-e019114-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/8f5e22983991/JAH3-10-e019114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/5f512378c1c6/JAH3-10-e019114-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8224/7955292/122900769133/JAH3-10-e019114-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Death and Myocardial Infarction Following Initial Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndromes With Myocardial Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Controlled Trials.初始血运重建与最佳药物治疗对慢性冠状动脉综合征伴心肌缺血患者的死亡和心肌梗死影响的系统评价和荟萃分析:来自当代随机对照试验的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):e019114. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019114. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Impact of treatment strategies on outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus according to presenting angina severity: A pooled analysis of three federally-funded randomized trials.根据首发心绞痛严重程度评估稳定型冠状动脉疾病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗策略对结局的影响:三项联邦资助的随机试验的汇总分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Oct;277:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
An updated meta-analysis of optimal medical therapy with or without invasive therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.稳定性冠心病患者采用或不采用有创治疗的最佳药物治疗的更新荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03997-7.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠状动脉疾病最佳药物治疗的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):476-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970954. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
5
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
6
Revascularization versus medical therapy for the treatment of stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.血运重建与药物治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的比较:当代随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;324:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Medical Treatment and Revascularization Options in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Disease.2 型糖尿病合并冠心病患者的治疗和血运重建选择。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):985-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.021.
8
Optimal medical therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial at the 5-year follow-up.最优药物治疗可改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建患者的临床结局:来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇洗脱支架和心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的 5 年随访结果。
Circulation. 2015 Apr 7;131(14):1269-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013042. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stenting in patients with diabetes.三项随机对照试验的荟萃分析:比较糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与使用药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;19(6):1002-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu291. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
10
Implications of Alternative Definitions of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后围手术期心肌梗死的替代定义的意义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 6;76(14):1609-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of invasive versus conservative strategy in stable coronary artery disease patients: a risk-stratification-based hypothesis-generative study.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者侵入性与保守策略的比较结果:一项基于风险分层的假设生成性研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04020-2.
2
Cost-utility analysis of combination medical therapies in chronic coronary syndrome: a comparative study using real-world and patient-level data from Iran.慢性冠状动脉综合征联合药物治疗的成本效用分析:一项使用伊朗真实世界和患者层面数据的比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):e081953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081953.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease.晚期肾病患者的冠状动脉疾病管理。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23;382(17):1608-1618. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915925. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction Stratified by Stable and Unstable Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chronic Total Occlusions in Non-Infarct-Related Coronary Arteries and Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes.
急性冠状动脉综合征接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者非梗死相关冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞与长期心血管死亡率
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7094. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237094.
4
Outcomes with revascularisation versus conservative management of participants with 3-vessel coronary artery disease in the ISCHEMIA trial.ISCHEMIA 试验中三支血管病变患者血运重建与保守治疗的结局比较。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Oct 21;20(20):e1276-e1287. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00240.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠状动脉疾病的最佳药物治疗:一项伞状综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 2;10(5):e27210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27210. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
6
Treatment Strategies for Chronic Coronary Heart Disease with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction or Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.左心室收缩功能障碍或射血分数保留的慢性冠心病治疗策略——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pathophysiology. 2023 Dec 18;30(4):640-658. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology30040046.
7
Why percutaneous revascularisation might not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with stable CAD?经皮血运重建术为何不能降低稳定性 CAD 患者心肌梗死和死亡风险?
Open Heart. 2023 Oct;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002343.
8
Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: diffuse atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction are more strongly associated with mortality than focally impaired perfusion.综合心肌血流储备(iMFR)评估:弥漫性动脉粥样硬化和微血管功能障碍与死亡率的相关性强于局部灌注受损。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):123-135. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06448-1. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
9
Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Without Revascularization - Rationale and Design of a Single-Arm Pilot Study.无血运重建的稳定型缺血性心脏病患者的心脏康复——一项单臂试点研究的原理与设计
Circ Rep. 2023 Feb 25;5(3):90-94. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0131. eCollection 2023 Mar 10.
10
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not Superior to Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在慢性冠状动脉综合征中并不优于最佳药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):1395. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041395.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对稳定型和不稳定型冠状动脉疾病分层的死亡和心肌梗死的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury.2 型心肌梗死和急性非缺血性心肌损伤患者的评估和治疗。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):1661-1678. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040631. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
The myth of 'stable' coronary artery disease.“稳定”型冠心病的误区。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Jan;17(1):9-21. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0233-y. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
PCI and CABG for Treating Stable Coronary Artery Disease: JACC Review Topic of the Week.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗稳定性冠状动脉疾病:JACC 本周回顾主题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):964-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.053.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
8
Interphysician agreement on subclassification of myocardial infarction.不同医师对心肌梗死亚分类的意见一致性。
Heart. 2018 Aug;104(15):1284-1291. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312409. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.稳定型心绞痛患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(ORBITA):一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Stable coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need.稳定型冠状动脉综合征:病理生理学、诊断进展和治疗需求。
Heart. 2018 Feb;104(4):284-292. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311446. Epub 2017 Oct 13.