• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.促进级联检测(FaCT):一项随机对照试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 May;31(5):779-783. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002118. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results and uptake of testing in relatives in a diverse Asian setting.在亚洲不同背景下,对 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因检测阳性结果及其亲属接受检测情况的沟通。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Jun;30(3):720-729. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1360. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
Cascade testing in Italian Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer families: a missed opportunity for cancer prevention?意大利遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌家系的级联检测:癌症预防的错失机会?
Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s10689-023-00349-w. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
4
Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
5
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Uptake of predictive testing among relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: a multicenter study in northeastern Spain.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 家族亲属中预测性检测的应用:西班牙东北部的一项多中心研究。
Fam Cancer. 2010 Sep;9(3):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9313-1.
7
Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.准备个体将遗传检测结果与其亲属进行沟通:一项随机对照试验的报告。
Fam Cancer. 2013 Sep;12(3):537-46. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9609-z.
8
Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial of healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure at Swedish cancer genetics clinics (DIRECT-study).直接致信有遗传性癌症风险的亲属 - 瑞典癌症遗传诊所开展医疗辅助与家庭介导风险披露的多中心随机对照试验方案(DIRECT 研究)
Trials. 2023 Dec 17;24(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07829-5.
9
Familial communication and cascade testing among relatives of BRCA population screening participants.BRCA 人群筛查参与者亲属中的家族沟通和级联检测。
Genet Med. 2018 Nov;20(11):1446-1454. doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.26. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.从耳语游戏的角度探讨 DNA 检测结果的家庭沟通:BRCA1/2 检测结果在患者与亲属之间沟通过程的回顾性研究。
Fam Cancer. 2011 Mar;10(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Cascade Genetic Risk Education and Testing in Families With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Pilot Study.遗传性癌症综合征家族的级联遗传风险教育和检测:一项试点研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e848-e858. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00677. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Diagnosis, treatment and disclosure: A qualitative exploration of participant challenges in a Monogenic Diabetes Registry.诊断、治疗和披露:单基因糖尿病登记处参与者面临挑战的定性探讨。
Genet Med. 2023 Apr;25(4):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100019. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
What happens in the long term: Uptake of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies among at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants detected via cascade testing.长期来看:通过级联检测发现致病性变异的高危亲属中癌症监测和预防策略的采用情况。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4241-4250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34482. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Lessons from the Failure to Complete a Trial of Denosumab in Women With a Pathogenic BRCA1/2 Variant Scheduling Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.携带致病性 BRCA1/2 变异的妇女行预防性输卵管卵巢切除术时,地舒单抗临床试验失败的教训。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Nov 1;15(11):721-726. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0051.
5
The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.先证者基因检测指征对亲属级联检测接受度的影响。
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 16;13:867226. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867226. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺癌、卵巢癌和胰腺癌,第 2.2021 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
2
From Probands to Relatives: Communication of Genetic Risk for Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer and Its Influence on Subsequent Testing.从先证者到亲属:遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌遗传风险的告知及其对后续检测的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(1):E91-E98. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000876.
3
Patient acceptance of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia in the CASCADE FH Registry.家族性高胆固醇血症患者对 CASCADE FH 注册研究中基因检测的接受程度。
J Clin Lipidol. 2020 Mar-Apr;14(2):218-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.基于诊断后癌症基因检测的级联分析:一种替代基于人群的筛查方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1398-1408. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02010. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.利用电话咨询促进级联基因检测的新策略的前瞻性可行性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1389-1397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02005. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.妇科癌症遗传学评估中的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?遗传性乳腺癌的漏诊:基因检测指南是工具还是障碍?
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 20;37(6):453-460. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01631. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
A clinically structured and partnered approach to genetic testing in Trinidadian women with breast cancer and their families.特立尼达和多巴哥乳腺癌女性及其家族的临床结构化和合作式基因检测方法。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(2):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5045-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndromes in Switzerland: Study Protocol.瑞士遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌和林奇综合征的癌症易感性级联筛查:研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Sep 20;6(9):e184. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8138.
10
Genetic Testing: What Problem Are We Trying to Solve?基因检测:我们试图解决什么问题?
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3789-3791. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.7899. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

促进级联检测(FaCT):一项随机对照试验。

Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 May;31(5):779-783. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002118. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002118
PMID:33443030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying mutation-carrying relatives of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes via cascade testing is an underused first step in primary cancer prevention. A feasibility study of facilitated genetic testing of at-risk relatives of patients with a known pathogenic mutation demonstrated encouraging uptake of cascade testing.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of genetic testing of identified first-degree relatives of probands with a confirmed mutation randomized to a facilitated cascade testing strategy versus standard of care, proband-mediated, information sharing.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that facilitated cascade testing will drive significantly higher uptake of genetic testing than the standard of care.

TRIAL DESIGN

The FaCT (Facilitated Cascade Testing) trial is a prospective multi-institutional randomized study comparing the efficacy of a multicomponent facilitated cascade testing intervention with the standard of care. Patients with a known mutation (probands) cared for at participating sites will be randomized. Probands randomized to the standard of care group will be instructed to share a family letter with their first-degree relatives and encourage them to complete genetic testing. First-degree relatives of probands randomized to the intervention arm will receive engagement strategies with a patient navigator, an educational video, and accessible genetic testing services.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Adult participants who are first-degree relatives of a patient with a mutation and have not had prior genetic testing will be included.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Analyses will assess the proportion of first-degree relatives identified by the proband who complete genetic testing by 6 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm.

SAMPLE SIZE

One hundred and fifty probands with a BRCA1/2 mutation will be randomized. Each proband is expected to provide an average of 3 relatives, for an expected 450 participants.

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

January 2024.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04613440.

摘要

背景

通过级联检测识别遗传性癌症综合征患者的携带突变的亲属是初级癌症预防中未充分利用的第一步。对患有已知致病性突变的患者的高危亲属进行便利基因检测的可行性研究表明,级联检测的接受度很高。

主要目标

我们的主要目标是比较随机分配到便利级联检测策略的患者一级亲属与标准护理(患者介导的信息共享)的一级亲属中接受基因检测的比例。

研究假设

我们假设便利级联检测将显著提高基因检测的接受率,超过标准护理。

试验设计

FaCT(便利级联检测)试验是一项前瞻性多机构随机研究,比较了多组分便利级联检测干预与标准护理的疗效。在参与地点接受治疗的已知突变(先证者)患者将被随机分组。随机分配到标准护理组的先证者将被指示与一级亲属分享家庭信,并鼓励他们完成基因检测。先证者随机分配到干预组的一级亲属将接受患者导航员、教育视频和可及的基因检测服务的参与策略。

主要纳入/排除标准:未接受过先前基因检测的一级亲属且为突变患者的成年参与者将被纳入。

主要终点

分析将评估干预组与对照组中通过 6 个月完成基因检测的一级亲属比例。

样本量

将随机分配 150 名具有 BRCA1/2 突变的先证者。每位先证者预计提供平均 3 名亲属,预计将有 450 名参与者。

预计完成入组和呈现结果的日期

2024 年 1 月。

试验注册

NCT04613440。