• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢动脉介入治疗的范式转变:我们是否在拯救肢体?

Changing Paradigms in Below-the-Knee Arterial Interventions: Are We Saving Legs?

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Jan;23(1):28-32.

PMID:33443339
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) involving the below-the-knee (BTK) arteries are at increased risk of limb loss. Despite improvement in endovascular modalities, it is still unclear whether an aggressive approach results in improved limb salvage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether an aggressive approach to BTK arterial disease results in improved limb salvage.

METHODS

A comparative study of two groups was conducted. Group 1 included patients treated between 2012 and 2014, primarily with transfemoral angioplasty of the tibial arteries. Group 2 included patients treated between 2015-2019 with a wide array of endovascular modalities (stents, multiple tibial artery and pedal angioplasty, retrograde access). Primary endpoint was freedom from amputation at 4 years.

RESULTS

A total of 529 BTK interventions were performed. Mean age was 71 ± 10.6 years, 382 (79%) were male. Patients in group 1 were less likely to be taking clopidogrel (66% vs. 83%, P < 0.01) and statins (72 % vs. 87%, P < 0.01). Several therapeutic modalities were used more often in group 2 than in group 1, including pedal angioplasty (24 vs. 43 %, P = 0.01), tibial and pedal retrograde access (0 vs. 10%, P = 0.01), and tibial stenting (3% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Revascularization of two or more tibial arteries was performed at a higher rate in group 2 (54% vs. 50%, P = 0.45). Estimated freedom from amputation at 40 months follow-up was higher in group 2 (53% vs. 63%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive, multimodality approach in treating BTK arteries results in improved limb salvage.

摘要

背景

累及膝下动脉的严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者有更高的肢体丧失风险。尽管腔内治疗方法有所改善,但目前尚不清楚积极的治疗方法是否能提高肢体存活率。

目的

评估积极治疗膝下动脉疾病是否能提高肢体存活率。

方法

进行了两组比较研究。第 1 组包括 2012 年至 2014 年期间主要接受经股动脉胫动脉球囊扩张术治疗的患者。第 2 组包括 2015 年至 2019 年期间采用多种腔内治疗方法(支架、多支胫动脉和足背动脉球囊扩张术、逆行入路)治疗的患者。主要终点是 4 年内免于截肢。

结果

共进行了 529 次膝下动脉介入治疗。平均年龄为 71±10.6 岁,382 例(79%)为男性。第 1 组患者更不可能服用氯吡格雷(66%比 83%,P<0.01)和他汀类药物(72%比 87%,P<0.01)。第 2 组比第 1 组更常使用多种治疗方法,包括足背动脉球囊扩张术(24%比 43%,P=0.01)、胫后和足背逆行入路(0%比 10%,P=0.01)和胫动脉支架置入术(3%比 25%,P=0.01)。第 2 组有更多的患者接受了两条或更多的胫动脉血运重建(54%比 50%,P=0.45)。第 2 组在 40 个月随访时免于截肢的估计率更高(53%比 63%,P=0.05)。

结论

积极的、多模式的治疗膝下动脉的方法可以提高肢体存活率。

相似文献

1
Changing Paradigms in Below-the-Knee Arterial Interventions: Are We Saving Legs?下肢动脉介入治疗的范式转变:我们是否在拯救肢体?
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Jan;23(1):28-32.
2
Retrograde pedal access for patients with critical limb ischemia.逆行足背动脉入路在严重肢体缺血患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
3
Six-Month Freedom From Amputation Rates and Quality of Life Following Tibial and Pedal Endovascular Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia.下肢严重缺血行胫部和足部血管腔内血管再通术后六个月的无截肢率及生活质量
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Apr;53(3):212-215. doi: 10.1177/1538574418823378. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Bypass versus endovascular intervention for healing ischemic foot wounds secondary to tibial arterial disease.旁路手术与血管内介入治疗治疗因胫骨动脉疾病导致的缺血性足部伤口愈合。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.076. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Analysis of the retrograde tibial artery approach in lower extremity revascularization in an office endovascular center.在办公室血管内中心进行下肢血运重建时分析逆行胫动脉入路。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.114. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia.系统评价和荟萃分析显示,血运重建治疗下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血的效果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S110-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
Retrograde Pedal Access and Endovascular Revascularization: A Safe and Effective Technique for High-Risk Patients with Complex Tibial Vessel Disease.逆行足背入路与血管腔内血运重建:治疗复杂胫血管疾病高危患者的一种安全有效的技术
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;31:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Approach to Tibiopedal Retrograde Revascularization of Below-The-Knee Peripheral Arterial Diseases With or Without Transradial Guidance Peripheral Angiography.经桡动脉入路的膝下外周动脉疾病的胫腓逆行血运重建方法,伴或不伴经皮外周血管造影术。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Jan;32(1):6-11. doi: 10.25270/jic/19.00072.
9
Prior Endovascular Intervention Is Not Detrimental to Pedal Bypasses for Ischemic Wounds.既往血管内介入治疗对缺血性伤口的足部旁路手术并无不利影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.11.066. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Multilevel versus isolated endovascular tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia.多水平与孤立的腔内治疗严重肢体缺血。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):722-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.232. Epub 2011 Jul 30.