Department of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;40(6):1227-1234. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04156-y. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Our aim was to evaluate the utility of the neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (NEOSC) to the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosing neonatal EOS. This retrospective study reviewed the records of neonates who underwent sepsis workups due to equivocal symptoms and compared their CRP values to the calculator's recommendations and their cultures. A total of 382 newborns who underwent sepsis work-up due to equivocal symptoms were included in our study. The calculator's recommendations would have reduced the number of newborns who underwent sepsis workups by 82.5% and antibiotic treatment by 83.4% (n = 315). Considering that 373 of 382 (97.6%) ultimately had no sepsis, the calculator's specificity was higher than that of CRP (83.9% versus 76.1%). When comparing the maximal CRP value with the risk according to the neonatal sepsis calculator, a significant correlation was found between them (P < 0.01), but the relationship was not strong (Pearson's correlation = 0.27). We found a significant correlation between the risk of sepsis according to the NEOSC and the CRP values, although the correlation was not strong. The calculator's high specificity enables safe avoidance of multiple blood tests and antibiotic treatments for suspected neonates who are not infected. CRP tests can reduce the number of infected newborns the calculator may miss, at the cost of unnecessary blood tests and antibiotic therapy to many newborns.
我们旨在评估新生儿早发性败血症风险计算器(NEOSC)在诊断新生儿 EOS 中的效用是否优于 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。本回顾性研究回顾了因症状不明确而接受败血症检查的新生儿记录,并将他们的 CRP 值与计算器的建议和培养结果进行了比较。共有 382 名因症状不明确而接受败血症检查的新生儿纳入了我们的研究。计算器的建议将使接受败血症检查的新生儿数量减少 82.5%,抗生素治疗减少 83.4%(n=315)。考虑到 382 例中有 373 例(97.6%)最终没有败血症,因此计算器的特异性高于 CRP(83.9%对 76.1%)。当比较最大 CRP 值与新生儿败血症计算器的风险时,发现它们之间存在显著相关性(P<0.01),但相关性不强(Pearson 相关系数=0.27)。我们发现 NEOSC 预测的败血症风险与 CRP 值之间存在显著相关性,尽管相关性不强。计算器的高特异性可以安全地避免对疑似未感染的新生儿进行多次血液检查和抗生素治疗。CRP 检查可以减少计算器可能遗漏的感染新生儿数量,但代价是对许多新生儿进行不必要的血液检查和抗生素治疗。