Grabbert M, Gratzke C, Khoder W Y, Katzenwadel A, Bauer R M
Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, LMU Klinikum, Campus Großhadern, München, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2021 Feb;60(2):178-185. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01436-x. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
The following article summarizes the current evidence including postoperative success rates and complications for various surgical options in the treatment of urinary incontinence. Due to different inclusion criteria and inconsistent definitions of study endpoints, the analysis of available studies is difficult. Thus, comparative studies with new devices for established treatment options should be planned. Structured processes used in certified continence centers improve the quality of care. Furthermore by documenting relevant complications, comparisons of treatment results thus become possible and provide evidence for the use of different surgical options in the treatment of urinary incontinence.
以下文章总结了目前关于治疗尿失禁的各种手术选择的证据，包括术后成功率和并发症。由于纳入标准不同以及研究终点的定义不一致，对现有研究进行分析存在困难。因此，应规划针对既定治疗方案的新器械的对比研究。经认证的尿失禁治疗中心所采用的结构化流程可提高护理质量。此外，通过记录相关并发症，从而能够对治疗结果进行比较，并为在尿失禁治疗中使用不同手术选择提供依据。
