Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术方式对死亡率的影响。

The effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation approaches on mortality.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1462-1469. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29456. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) approaches on mortality and identify effect modifiers and predictors for mortality.

BACKGROUND

Alternative access routes to transfemoral (TF) TAVI include the surgical intra-thoracic direct-aortic (DA) and transapical (TA) approach. TA TAVI has been associated with a higher mortality rate. We hypothesized that this is related to effect modifiers, in particular the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

This multicentre study derived its data from prospective registries. To adjust for confounders, we used propensity-score based, stabilized inverse probability weighted Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 5,910 patients underwent TAVI via TF (N = 4,072), DA (N = 524), and TA (N = 1,314) access. Compared to TF, 30-day mortality was increased among DA (HR 1.87, 95%CI 1.26-2.78, p = .002) and TA (HR 3.34, 95%CI 2.28-4.89, p < .001) cases. Compared to TF, 5-year mortality was increased among TA cases (HR 1.50, 95%CI 1.24-1.83, p < .001). None of the variables showed a significant interaction between the approaches and mortality. An impaired LVEF (≤35%) increased mortality in all approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical intra-thoracic TA and DA TAVI are both associated with a higher 30-day mortality than TF TAVI. TA TAVI is associated with a higher 5-year mortality than TF TAVI. The DA approach may therefore have some advantages over the TA approach when TF access is not feasible.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)方法对死亡率的影响,并确定死亡率的影响因素和预测因素。

背景

经股动脉(TF)TAVI 的替代入路包括经胸外科直接主动脉(DA)和经心尖(TA)入路。TA TAVI 与更高的死亡率相关。我们假设这与影响因素有关,特别是左心室射血分数(LVEF)。

方法

这项多中心研究的数据来自前瞻性注册。为了调整混杂因素,我们使用基于倾向评分的稳定逆概率加权 Cox 回归模型。

结果

共有 5910 名患者通过 TF(N=4072)、DA(N=524)和 TA(N=1314)途径接受 TAVI。与 TF 相比,DA(HR 1.87,95%CI 1.26-2.78,p=0.002)和 TA(HR 3.34,95%CI 2.28-4.89,p<0.001)的 30 天死亡率增加。与 TF 相比,TA 病例的 5 年死亡率增加(HR 1.50,95%CI 1.24-1.83,p<0.001)。在所有方法中,没有一个变量显示出方法与死亡率之间存在显著的相互作用。LVEF 降低(≤35%)增加了所有方法的死亡率。

结论

与 TF TAVI 相比,经胸外科 TA 和 DA TAVI 均与较高的 30 天死亡率相关。与 TF TAVI 相比,TA TAVI 与较高的 5 年死亡率相关。因此,当 TF 入路不可行时,DA 方法可能比 TA 方法具有一些优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验