Suppr超能文献

应用耳软骨移植在鼻尖整形术中:3 种方法的比较和经验。

Application of Conchal Cartilage Grafts in Nasal Tip Plasty: Comparison and Experience of 3 Methods.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Mar 1;86(3S Suppl 2):S199-S207. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002638.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The autologous conchal cartilage of good elasticity is easy to harvest, thus is often used in nasal tip plasty of East Asians. However, the operation techniques vary a lot among different surgeons. This article aims to introduce 3 techniques commonly used in clinical practice.

METHODS

One hundred three patients were included in this study and divided into 3 groups according to the shape of the nasal tip during 2017 to 2019. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months. All patients were measured with Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). ImageJ software was used to measure and calculate the projection ratio for lateral position standard image, and columella-labial angle (CLA) was measured.

RESULTS

In group 1, SCHNOS for nasal obstruction (SCHNOS-O) score were 13.23 ± 7.61 and 14.49 ± 10.55 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS for nasal cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) score were 66.55 ± 31.23 and 21.73 ± 18.91 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.51 ± 0.04 and 0.57 ± 0.05 (P < 0.001); CLA were 91.02° ± 5.67° and 93.55° ± 4.64° (P > 0.05), preoperative and postoperative, respectively. In group 2, SCHNOS-O score were 16.76 ± 13.44 and 15.44 ± 9.26 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS-C score were 61.87 ± 44.14 and 19.16 ± 29.37 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.50 ± 0.05 and 0.58 ± 0.03 (P < 0.001); CLA were 92.32° ± 6.39° and 94.86° ± 5.96°(P > 0.05), preoperative and postoperative, respectively. In group 3, SCHNOS-O score were 15.25 ± 7.83 and 17.73 ± 11.66 (P > 0.05); SCHNOS-C score were 52.03 ± 33.38 and 17.73 ± 11.66 (P < 0.001); projection ratio were 0.53 ± 0.05 and 0.57 ± 0.02 (P < 0.001); CLA were 91.65° ± 5.75° and 93.21° ± 5.38° (P > 0.05), preoperational and postoperational, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

None of these 3 techniques cause or aggravate nasal obstruction, and all of them can achieve high cosmetic satisfaction. Technique 1 and technique 2 are suitable for the patients with moderate and moderate to severe short nose that is common in East Asia, which can better increase the protrusion of the tip and length of the nose. Technique 3 is suitable for the patients with better shape of the nose, who need to slightly increase the protrusion of the nasal tip and increase the upward rotation.

摘要

简介

自体耳软骨弹性良好,取材方便,因此常被用于东亚人鼻尖整形。然而,不同医生的手术技术差异很大。本文旨在介绍三种临床常用的技术。

方法

本研究纳入了 2017 年至 2019 年期间的 103 例患者,根据鼻尖形状将患者分为 3 组。所有患者均随访至少 6 个月。所有患者均采用标准化美容和健康鼻结局调查(SCHNOS)进行评估。使用 ImageJ 软件测量并计算侧位标准图像的投影比,测量并计算鼻唇角(CLA)。

结果

在第 1 组中,SCHNOS 鼻阻塞评分(SCHNOS-O)分别为 13.23 ± 7.61 和 14.49 ± 10.55(P > 0.05);SCHNOS 鼻部美观评分(SCHNOS-C)分别为 66.55 ± 31.23 和 21.73 ± 18.91(P < 0.001);投影比分别为 0.51 ± 0.04 和 0.57 ± 0.05(P < 0.001);CLA 分别为 91.02° ± 5.67°和 93.55° ± 4.64°(P > 0.05),分别为术前和术后。在第 2 组中,SCHNOS-O 评分分别为 16.76 ± 13.44 和 15.44 ± 9.26(P > 0.05);SCHNOS-C 评分分别为 61.87 ± 44.14 和 19.16 ± 29.37(P < 0.001);投影比分别为 0.50 ± 0.05 和 0.58 ± 0.03(P < 0.001);CLA 分别为 92.32° ± 6.39°和 94.86° ± 5.96°(P > 0.05),分别为术前和术后。在第 3 组中,SCHNOS-O 评分分别为 15.25 ± 7.83 和 17.73 ± 11.66(P > 0.05);SCHNOS-C 评分分别为 52.03 ± 33.38 和 17.73 ± 11.66(P < 0.001);投影比分别为 0.53 ± 0.05 和 0.57 ± 0.02(P < 0.001);CLA 分别为 91.65° ± 5.75°和 93.21° ± 5.38°(P > 0.05),分别为术前和术后。

结论

这三种技术均不会加重或引起鼻阻塞,且均能获得较高的美容满意度。技术 1 和技术 2 适用于常见的中、中重度短鼻患者,能更好地增加鼻尖突出度和鼻长度。技术 3 适用于鼻外形较好、仅需轻度增加鼻尖突出度并增加鼻尖向上旋转度的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验