• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化鼻部美容和健康结局量表的最小临床重要差异。

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.

机构信息

Clinical Research Fellow.

Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jul 12;39(8):837-840. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz070.

DOI:10.1093/asj/sjz070
PMID:30873533
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to define the MCID for both domains of the SCHNOS questionnaire.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included patients who underwent functional, cosmetic, or combined rhinoplasty operation from June 2017 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral center. The average preoperative, postoperative, and change in scores were calculated for the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE) and SCHNOS. Anchor-based MCIDs were estimated for both SCHNOS subscales to define change in obstruction and cosmesis perceived after the rhinoplasty.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients (69% women, 31% males) with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 38 years (14.7) at the time of surgery were included. The mean postoperative follow-up period (SD) was 145 days (117). The mean preoperative score (SD) for the NOSE was 52 (32), SCHNOS for nasal obstruction (SCHNOS-O) score was 55 (33), and SCHNOS for nasal cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) score was 50 (26) points. Postoperatively, the NOSE score was 23 (22), SCHNOS-O score was 24 (23), and SCHNOS-C score was 13 (18) points. The mean change in scores (SD) for NOSE, SCHNOS-O, and SCHNOS-C was -29 (37), -31 (38), and -37 (28), respectively. The calculated MCID for SCHNOS-O was 26 (16) and for SCHNOS-C was 22 (15) points. The MCID for NOSE was 24 (13) points. A sensitivity test for the patients with a follow-up ≥3 months showed only slightly different MCID estimates: 28 (17) for SCHNOS-O, 18 (13) for SCHNOS-C, and 24 (15) points for NOSE.

CONCLUSIONS

For the obstruction domain SCHNOS-O, the MCID was 28 points. For the cosmetic domain SCHNOS-C, the MCID was 18 points.

摘要

背景

尚未确定标准化美容和健康鼻结果调查(SCHNOS)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

目的

作者旨在确定 SCHNOS 问卷的两个领域的 MCID。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月在三级转诊中心接受功能性、美容或联合鼻整形手术的患者。计算了鼻阻塞症状评估量表(NOSE)和 SCHNOS 的平均术前、术后和变化评分。基于锚定的 MCID 分别估计了 SCHNOS 子量表,以定义鼻整形术后感知到的阻塞和美容变化。

结果

共纳入 87 例患者(69%女性,31%男性),手术时平均年龄(标准差)为 38 岁(14.7)。平均术后随访期(标准差)为 145 天(117)。NOSE 的平均术前评分(标准差)为 52(32),SCHNOS 鼻阻塞评分(SCHNOS-O)为 55(33),SCHNOS 鼻美容评分(SCHNOS-C)为 50(26)分。术后,NOSE 评分为 23(22),SCHNOS-O 评分为 24(23),SCHNOS-C 评分为 13(18)分。NOSE、SCHNOS-O 和 SCHNOS-C 的评分变化平均值(标准差)分别为-29(37)、-31(38)和-37(28)。SCHNOS-O 的计算 MCID 为 26(16),SCHNOS-C 的 MCID 为 22(15)分。NOSE 的 MCID 为 24(13)点。对随访时间≥3 个月的患者进行敏感性测试,仅显示出略有不同的 MCID 估计值:SCHNOS-O 为 28(17),SCHNOS-C 为 18(13),NOSE 为 24(15)点。

结论

对于阻塞域 SCHNOS-O,MCID 为 28 分。对于美容域 SCHNOS-C,MCID 为 18 分。

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.标准化鼻部美容和健康结局量表的最小临床重要差异。
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jul 12;39(8):837-840. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz070.
2
Natural History of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey After Rhinoplasty.隆鼻术后标准化鼻部美容和健康结果调查的自然史。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E116-E123. doi: 10.1002/lary.28831. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Functional Outcomes of Septal Extension Grafting in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Cohort Analysis.鼻中隔延伸移植在美容鼻整形术中的功能效果:一项队列分析。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 May-Jun;23(3):172-179. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0304. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.用于功能性和美容性鼻整形术的 10 项标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查(SCHNOS)。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083.
5
Comparison of the Distribution of Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey Scores Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.比较有症状和无症状患者的标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查评分的分布。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):305-309. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0054. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
Analysis of Nasal Obstruction Patterns Following Reductive Rhinoplasty.分析鼻中隔矫正术后的鼻塞模式。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;44(1):122-128. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01484-5. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS Scales.保留鼻背与降低鼻背隆鼻术的比较:通过鼻阻力测量、NOSE量表和SCHNOS量表分析鼻腔通畅度及美学效果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):728-734. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03151-8. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
Outcomes of Combined Anterior Septal Reconstruction and Dorsal Hump Reduction.鼻中隔前段重建与驼峰降低术的疗效。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E803-E810. doi: 10.1002/lary.28611. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Application of Conchal Cartilage Grafts in Nasal Tip Plasty: Comparison and Experience of 3 Methods.应用耳软骨移植在鼻尖整形术中:3 种方法的比较和经验。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Mar 1;86(3S Suppl 2):S199-S207. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002638.
10
Assessment of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire for Detection of Clinically Significant Global Health-Related Quality-of-Life Improvement Following Functional Septorhinoplasty.评估欧洲五维健康量表问卷在功能性鼻中隔成形术后检测具有临床意义的全球健康相关生活质量改善方面的作用。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):95-100. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1410.

引用本文的文献

1
Crooked Nose: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.歪鼻:美学与功能效果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4012-4018. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04765-x. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of No-Dissection Nasal Dorsum Using Subdorsal Septal Excision in Preservation Rhinoplasty.保留性鼻整形术中应用鼻中隔下部分切除术的无剥离鼻背的功能和美学效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):596e-602e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010335. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology-Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review.
耳鼻喉科学中引用最多的患者报告结局测量指标:重新审视最小临床重要差异:综述。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):261-276. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4703.
4
Temperature-controlled radiofrequency device treatment of the nasal valve for nasal airway obstruction: A randomized controlled trial.经温控射频设备治疗鼻阀以改善鼻腔气道阻塞:一项随机对照试验。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Dec;11(12):1676-1684. doi: 10.1002/alr.22861. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
A novel device combining acoustic vibration with oscillating expiratory pressure for the treatment of nasal congestion.一种将声振动与振荡呼气压力相结合用于治疗鼻充血的新型装置。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 May;10(5):610-618. doi: 10.1002/alr.22537. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Impact of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Versus Dorsal Hump Resection on the Internal Nasal Valve: a Quantitative Radiological Study.鼻中隔成形术与驼峰切除对鼻内阀影响的定量影像学研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;44(3):879-887. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01627-z. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Outcomes of Extracorporeal Septoplasty and Its Modifications in Treatment of Severe L-Strut Septal Deviation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体外鼻中隔成形术及其改良术治疗重度 L 型鼻中隔偏曲的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Dec 1;21(6):542-550. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.1020.