Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):e037243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037243.
Over the last two decades, the use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain in England has steadily increased despite lack of evidence of both long-term effectiveness in pain relief and significant, well-documented physical and mental adverse events. Guidelines recommend tapering when harms outweigh benefits, but the addictive nature of opioids hinders simple dose-reduction strategies. Improving the Well-being of people with Opioid Treated CHronic pain (I-WOTCH) trial tests a multicomponent self-management intervention aimed to help patients with chronic non-malignant pain taper opioid doses. This paper outlines the methods to be used for the economic analysis of the I-WOTCH intervention compared with the best usual care.
Economic evaluation alongside the I-WOTCH study, prospectively designed to identify, measure and value key healthcare resource use and outcomes arising from the treatment strategies being compared. A within-trial cost-consequences analysis and a model-based long-term cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from the National Health Service and Personal Social Service perspective in England. The former will quantify key parameters to populate a Markov model designed to estimate the long-term cost and quality-adjusted life years of the I-WOTCH intervention against best usual care. Regression equations will be used to estimate parameters such as transition probabilities, utilities, and costs associated with the model's states and events. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be used to assess the impact of parameter uncertainty onto the predicted costs and health outcomes, and the resulting value for money assessment of the I-WOTCH intervention.
Full ethics approval was granted by Yorkshire & The Humber-South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee on 13 September 2016 (16/YH/0325). Current protocol: V.1.7, date 31 July 2019. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, newsletters and websites.
International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (49 470 934); Pre-result.
尽管缺乏长期缓解疼痛的有效性证据,且存在大量有案可查的身体和精神不良事件,但在过去的二十年中,在英格兰,阿片类药物被越来越多地用于治疗慢性疼痛。指南建议在危害超过益处时逐渐减少剂量,但阿片类药物的成瘾性阻碍了简单的剂量减少策略。改善接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性疼痛人群的幸福感(I-WOTCH)试验测试了一种多成分自我管理干预措施,旨在帮助慢性非恶性疼痛患者减少阿片类药物剂量。本文概述了用于与最佳常规护理相比对 I-WOTCH 干预措施进行经济分析的方法。
这项前瞻性研究对 I-WOTCH 研究进行了经济评估,旨在确定、衡量和评估正在比较的治疗策略所产生的关键医疗资源使用和结果。将从英国国民健康服务和个人社会服务的角度进行基于试验的成本-后果分析和基于模型的长期成本效益分析。前者将量化关键参数,以填充旨在估计 I-WOTCH 干预与最佳常规护理相比的长期成本和质量调整生命年的马尔可夫模型。回归方程将用于估计与模型状态和事件相关的转移概率、效用和成本等参数。概率敏感性分析将用于评估参数不确定性对预测成本和健康结果的影响,以及对 I-WOTCH 干预措施的资金价值评估。
2016 年 9 月 13 日,约克郡和亨伯南约克郡研究伦理委员会(16/YH/0325)批准了全面的伦理审查。当前方案:V.1.7,日期 2019 年 7 月 31 日。研究结果将在同行评议的期刊、科学会议、时事通讯和网站上发表。
国际标准随机对照试验编号(49470934);预结果。