Els Charl, Jackson Tanya D, Kunyk Diane, Lappi Vernon G, Sonnenberg Barend, Hagtvedt Reidar, Sharma Sangita, Kolahdooz Fariba, Straube Sebastian
Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2.
Chronic pain is common and can be challenging to manage. Despite increased utilisation of opioids, the safety and efficacy of long-term use of these compounds for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) remains controversial. This overview of Cochrane Reviews complements the overview entitled 'High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews'.
To provide an overview of the occurrence and nature of adverse events associated with any opioid agent (any dose, frequency, or route of administration) used on a medium- or long-term basis for the treatment of CNCP in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (the Cochrane Library) Issue 3, 2017 on 8 March 2017 to identify all Cochrane Reviews of studies of medium- or long-term opioid use (2 weeks or more) for CNCP in adults aged 18 and over. We assessed the quality of the reviews using the AMSTAR criteria (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) as adapted for Cochrane Overviews. We assessed the quality of the evidence for the outcomes using the GRADE framework.
We included a total of 16 reviews in our overview, of which 14 presented unique quantitative data. These 14 Cochrane Reviews investigated 14 different opioid agents that were administered for time periods of two weeks or longer. The longest study was 13 months in duration, with most in the 6- to 16-week range. The quality of the included reviews was high using AMSTAR criteria, with 11 reviews meeting all 10 criteria, and 5 of the reviews meeting 9 out of 10, not scoring a point for either duplicate study selection and data extraction, or searching for articles irrespective of language and publication type. The quality of the evidence for the generic adverse event outcomes according to GRADE ranged from very low to moderate, with risk of bias and imprecision being identified for the following generic adverse event outcomes: any adverse event, any serious adverse event, and withdrawals due to adverse events. A GRADE assessment of the quality of the evidence for specific adverse events led to a downgrading to very low- to moderate-quality evidence due to risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision.We calculated the equivalent milligrams of morphine per 24 hours for each opioid studied (buprenorphine, codeine, dextropropoxyphene, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, levorphanol, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, tapentadol, tilidine, and tramadol). In the 14 Cochrane Reviews providing unique quantitative data, there were 61 studies with a total of 18,679 randomised participants; 12 of these studies had a cross-over design with two to four arms and a total of 796 participants. Based on the 14 selected Cochrane Reviews, there was a significantly increased risk of experiencing any adverse event with opioids compared to placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.66) as well as with opioids compared to a non-opioid active pharmacological comparator, with a similar risk ratio (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.33). There was also a significantly increased risk of experiencing a serious adverse event with opioids compared to placebo (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.06 to 3.67). Furthermore, we found significantly increased risk ratios with opioids compared to placebo for a number of specific adverse events: constipation, dizziness, drowsiness, fatigue, hot flushes, increased sweating, nausea, pruritus, and vomiting.There was no data on any of the following prespecified adverse events of interest in any of the included reviews in this overview of Cochrane Reviews: addiction, cognitive dysfunction, depressive symptoms or mood disturbances, hypogonadism or other endocrine dysfunction, respiratory depression, sexual dysfunction, and sleep apnoea or sleep-disordered breathing. We found no data for adverse events analysed by sex or ethnicity.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A number of adverse events, including serious adverse events, are associated with the medium- and long-term use of opioids for CNCP. The absolute event rate for any adverse event with opioids in trials using a placebo as comparison was 78%, with an absolute event rate of 7.5% for any serious adverse event. Based on the adverse events identified, clinically relevant benefit would need to be clearly demonstrated before long-term use could be considered in people with CNCP in clinical practice. A number of adverse events that we would have expected to occur with opioid use were not reported in the included Cochrane Reviews. Going forward, we recommend more rigorous identification and reporting of all adverse events in randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews on opioid therapy. The absence of data for many adverse events represents a serious limitation of the evidence on opioids. We also recommend extending study follow-up, as a latency of onset may exist for some adverse events.
慢性疼痛很常见,其管理颇具挑战性。尽管阿片类药物的使用有所增加,但长期使用这些药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的安全性和有效性仍存在争议。本Cochrane系统评价概述补充了题为“高剂量阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛:Cochrane系统评价概述”的概述。
概述与任何阿片类药物(任何剂量、频率或给药途径)中长期用于治疗成人CNCP相关的不良事件的发生情况和性质。
我们于2017年3月8日检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(Cochrane图书馆)2017年第3期,以识别所有关于18岁及以上成年人中长期使用阿片类药物(2周或更长时间)治疗CNCP的研究的Cochrane系统评价。我们使用适用于Cochrane概述的AMSTAR标准(评估系统评价的方法学质量)评估了这些系统评价的质量。我们使用GRADE框架评估了结局证据的质量。
我们的概述共纳入了16篇系统评价,其中14篇提供了独特的定量数据。这14篇Cochrane系统评价研究了14种不同的阿片类药物,给药时间为两周或更长。最长的研究持续了13个月,大多数在6至16周范围内。根据AMSTAR标准,纳入的系统评价质量较高,11篇系统评价符合全部10条标准,5篇系统评价符合10条标准中的9条,在重复研究选择和数据提取或检索文章(无论语言和出版类型)方面未得分。根据GRADE,一般不良事件结局证据的质量从极低到中等不等,在以下一般不良事件结局中发现了偏倚风险和不精确性:任何不良事件、任何严重不良事件以及因不良事件而退出。对特定不良事件证据质量进行的GRADE评估由于偏倚风险、间接性和不精确性而导致证据质量降级为极低至中等质量。我们计算了所研究的每种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、可待因、右丙氧芬、二氢可待因、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、左啡诺、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮、羟吗啡酮、他喷他多、替利定和曲马多)每24小时的等效吗啡毫克数。在提供独特定量数据的14篇Cochrane系统评价中,有61项研究,共18679名随机参与者;其中12项研究采用交叉设计,有两到四个组,共796名参与者。基于14篇选定的Cochrane系统评价,与安慰剂相比,使用阿片类药物发生任何不良事件的风险显著增加(风险比(RR)1.42,95%置信区间(CI)1.22至1.66),与非阿片类活性药物对照相比,使用阿片类药物的风险比相似(RR 1.21,95%CI 1.10至1.33)。与安慰剂相比,使用阿片类药物发生严重不良事件的风险也显著增加(RR 2.75,95%CI 2.06至3.67)。此外,我们发现与安慰剂相比,阿片类药物在一些特定不良事件上的风险比显著增加:便秘、头晕、嗜睡、疲劳、潮热、出汗增多、恶心、瘙痒和呕吐。在本Cochrane系统评价概述的任何纳入系统评价中,均未获得关于以下任何预先指定的感兴趣不良事件的数据:成瘾、认知功能障碍、抑郁症状或情绪障碍、性腺功能减退或其他内分泌功能障碍、呼吸抑制、性功能障碍以及睡眠呼吸暂停或睡眠呼吸紊乱。我们未发现按性别或种族分析不良事件的数据。
多种不良事件,包括严重不良事件,与中长期使用阿片类药物治疗CNCP相关。在以安慰剂为对照的试验中,使用阿片类药物发生任何不良事件的绝对发生率为78%,任何严重不良事件的绝对发生率为7.5%。基于已识别的不良事件,在临床实践中考虑对CNCP患者长期使用阿片类药物之前,需要明确证明其具有临床相关益处。我们预期会在使用阿片类药物时发生的一些不良事件,在纳入的Cochrane系统评价中未被报告。展望未来,我们建议在随机对照试验和阿片类药物治疗的系统评价中更严格地识别和报告所有不良事件。许多不良事件缺乏数据是阿片类药物证据的严重局限性。我们还建议延长研究随访时间,因为一些不良事件可能存在发病潜伏期。