Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Surgery. 2021 May;169(5):1145-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.023. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Although higher thyroidectomy volume has been linked with lower complication rates, its association with incidental parathyroidectomy remains less studied. The volume relationship is even less clear for central neck dissection, where individual parathyroid glands are at greater risk.
Patients undergoing thyroidectomy with or without central neck dissection were evaluated for incidental parathyroidectomy, hypoparathyroidism, and hypocalcemia. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using binary logistic regression.
Overall, 1,114 thyroidectomies and 396 concurrent central neck dissections were performed across 7 surgeons. Incidental parathyroidectomy occurred in 22.4% of surgeries (range, 16.9%-43.6%), affecting 7.1% of parathyroids at risk (range, 5.8%-14.5%). When stratified by surgeon, lower incidental parathyroidectomy rates were associated with higher thyroidectomy volumes (R = 0.77, P = .008) and higher central neck dissection volumes (R = 0.93, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, low-volume surgeon (odds ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval 2.06-4.19, P < .001), extrathyroidal extension (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 1.24-7.87, P = .016), prophylactic central neck dissection (odds ratio 2.68, 95% confidence interval 1.65-4.35, P <.001), and therapeutic central neck dissection (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.98-9.96, P < .001) were the most significant factors associated with incidental parathyroidectomy. In addition, incidental parathyroidectomy was associated with a higher likelihood of temporary hypoparathyroidism (odds ratio 2.79, 95% confidence interval 1.45-5.38, P = .002) and permanent hypoparathyroidism (odds ratio 4.62, 95% confidence interval 1.41-5.96, P = .025), but not permanent hypocalcemia (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.48-3.35, P = .63). Higher lymph node yield in central neck dissection was not associated with higher incidental parathyroidectomy rates (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.85-8.81, P = .82).
Higher surgical volume conferred a lower rate of incidental parathyroidectomy. Nonetheless, greater lymph node yield in central neck dissections did not result in greater parathyroid-related morbidity. Such findings support the value of leveraging surgical volume to both optimize oncologic resection and minimize complication rates.
尽管甲状腺切除术的高切除量与较低的并发症发生率相关,但它与意外甲状旁腺切除术的关联研究较少。对于中央颈部清扫术,个体甲状旁腺的风险更高,因此这种切除量的关联就更加不明确。
对接受甲状腺切除术(伴或不伴中央颈部清扫术)的患者进行意外甲状旁腺切除术、甲状旁腺功能减退症和低钙血症评估。使用二项逻辑回归进行单变量和多变量分析。
7 位外科医生共进行了 1114 例甲状腺切除术和 396 例同期中央颈部清扫术。手术中意外甲状旁腺切除术的发生率为 22.4%(范围 16.9%-43.6%),影响风险甲状旁腺的 7.1%(范围 5.8%-14.5%)。按外科医生分层,较低的意外甲状旁腺切除术发生率与较高的甲状腺切除术切除量(R=0.77,P=0.008)和较高的中央颈部清扫术切除量(R=0.93,P<0.001)相关。多变量分析显示,低切除量的外科医生(比值比 2.94,95%置信区间 2.06-4.19,P<0.001)、甲状腺外延伸(比值比 3.13,95%置信区间 1.24-7.87,P=0.016)、预防性中央颈部清扫术(比值比 2.68,95%置信区间 1.65-4.35,P<0.001)和治疗性中央颈部清扫术(比值比 4.44,95%置信区间 1.98-9.96,P<0.001)是与意外甲状旁腺切除术最相关的重要因素。此外,意外甲状旁腺切除术与暂时性甲状旁腺功能减退症(比值比 2.79,95%置信区间 1.45-5.38,P=0.002)和永久性甲状旁腺功能减退症(比值比 4.62,95%置信区间 1.41-5.96,P=0.025)的发生风险更高相关,但与永久性低钙血症(比值比 1.27,95%置信区间 0.48-3.35,P=0.63)无关。中央颈部清扫术的淋巴结产量增加与意外甲状旁腺切除术的发生率增加无关(比值比 1.13,95%置信区间 0.85-8.81,P=0.82)。
更高的手术切除量与意外甲状旁腺切除术的低发生率相关。尽管如此,中央颈部清扫术的淋巴结产量增加并不会导致更高的甲状旁腺相关发病率。这些发现支持利用手术切除量来优化肿瘤切除术并最大限度地降低并发症发生率的价值。