• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的比较:一项多中心的有效性研究。

Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):609-618. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023
PMID:33446375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer is known for its high risk of complications. Although open radical cystectomy (ORC) is regarded as the standard treatment, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasingly used in practice, despite the fact that high-quality evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness of RARC compared with that of ORC, in terms of 90 d complications (Clavien-Dindo), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective comparative effectiveness study was conducted in 19 Dutch centres, expert in either ORC or RARC. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30, 90, and 365 d.

INTERVENTION

Standard ORC or RARC with PLND, using a standardised perioperative protocol.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was any-grade complications after 90 d. Secondary outcomes included HRQOL, complications (minor, major, 30 d, and 365 d), and clinical outcomes. Differences were calculated as risk differences (RDs) between the groups with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential baseline differences by means of propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Between March 2016 and November 2018, 348 patients were included (n = 168 for ORC, n = 180 for RARC). At 90 d, any-grade complication rates were 63% for ORC and 56% for RARC (RD -6.4%, 95% CI -17 to 4.5). Major complication rates were 15% for ORC and 16% for RARC (RD 0.9%, 95% CI -7.0 to 8.8). Total minor complication rates were 57% for ORC and 49% for RARC (RD -7.6%, 95% CI -19 to 3.6). Analyses showed no statistically significant differences in HRQOL between ORC and RARC. Some differences were found in the secondary outcomes in favour of either RARC or ORC. The major drawback inherent to the design comprises residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentre comparative effectiveness study showed no statistically significant differences between ORC and RARC in terms of complications and HRQOL.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This multicentre study did not show differences in overall complication rates, health-related quality of life, mortality, and clinical and oncological outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients.

摘要

背景

膀胱癌患者行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)加盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)和尿流改道术,其并发症风险高。虽然开放性 RC(ORC)被认为是标准治疗方法,但机器人辅助 RC(RARC)在实践中越来越多地被应用,尽管缺乏比较两种技术有效性的高质量证据。

目的

研究 RARC 与 ORC 在 90 天并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级)、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和临床结局方面的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 19 家荷兰中心进行的前瞻性比较有效性研究,这些中心均擅长 ORC 或 RARC。随访时间分别为 30、90 和 365 天。

干预

PLND 行标准 ORC 或 RARC,采用标准化围手术期方案。

结局测量和统计分析

主要结局为 90 天后任何级别的并发症。次要结局包括 HRQOL、并发症(轻度、重度、30 天和 365 天)和临床结局。差异计算为两组之间的风险差异(RD),置信区间(CI)为 95%,通过基于倾向评分的逆概率治疗加权调整潜在基线差异。

结果和局限性

2016 年 3 月至 2018 年 11 月,共纳入 348 例患者(ORC 组 168 例,RARC 组 180 例)。90 天时,ORC 的任何级别并发症发生率为 63%,RARC 为 56%(RD-6.4%,95%CI-17%至 4.5%)。ORC 的主要并发症发生率为 15%,RARC 为 16%(RD 0.9%,95%CI-7.0%至 8.8%)。ORC 的总轻度并发症发生率为 57%,RARC 为 49%(RD-7.6%,95%CI-19%至 3.6%)。分析显示,ORC 和 RARC 之间在 HRQOL 方面无统计学显著差异。在某些次要结局中,RARC 或 ORC 存在优势。设计固有的主要缺陷是存在残余混杂。

结论

这项多中心比较有效性研究显示,在并发症和 HRQOL 方面,ORC 和 RARC 之间无统计学显著差异。

患者概况

这项多中心研究未显示在膀胱癌患者中,开放性和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术在总体并发症发生率、健康相关生活质量、死亡率以及临床和肿瘤学结局方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的比较:一项多中心的有效性研究。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):609-618. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:一项伴随多中心比较有效性研究的经济学评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).一项关于开放性、机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的单中心早期随机对照三臂试验(CORAL)
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
6
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗成人膀胱癌。
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):765-779. doi: 10.1111/bju.14870.
8
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: 3-Year Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全腔内尿路转流与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的 3 年结果。
Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):422-430. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
9
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:使用随机对照试验的围手术期、肿瘤学和生活质量结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Complication and Readmission Rates Between Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Randomized RAZOR Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的并发症和再入院率比较:随机RAZOR临床试验的结果
J Urol. 2025 Jun;213(6):684-692. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004497. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Utilizing vaginal natural orifice to facilitate bowel manipulation during totally intracorporeal ileal conduit construction: a retrospective cohort study.利用阴道自然腔道在完全腹腔镜下回肠代膀胱术构建过程中辅助肠道操作:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2453827. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2453827. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
3
Long-term quality of life in patients with bladder cancer following radical cystectomy.
根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者的长期生活质量
BJU Int. 2025 Apr;135(4):675-683. doi: 10.1111/bju.16610. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
4
Open versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for the Treatment of pT4a Bladder Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗pT4a期膀胱癌:围手术期结果比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;16(7):1329. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071329.
5
Perioperative outcomes and continence following robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with mainz pouch II urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer.膀胱癌患者行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术加 Mainz pouch II 尿流改道术的围手术期结果和控尿情况。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11874-x.
6
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: evaluation of complications, survival, and opioid prescribing patterns.机器人与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:并发症、生存和阿片类药物处方模式评估。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 12;18(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01749-x.
7
Extraperitoneal Versus Intraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹膜外与腹腔内根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5932-5941. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13744-5. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
8
EffectiveNess of a multimodal preHAbilitation program in patieNts with bladder canCEr undergoing radical cystectomy: protocol of the ENHANCE multicentre randomised controlled trial.多模式预康复方案在接受根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者中的有效性:ENHANCE 多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e071304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071304.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Where we are in 2023.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:2023 年的现状。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Mar;64(2):107-117. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220384.
10
Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges-a narrative review.女性根治性膀胱切除术与尿流改道:技术、结果及挑战——一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1598-1610. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-463.