Althumairi Arwa, Alnasser Zainab, Alsadeq Sarah, Al-Kahtani Nouf, Aljaffary Afnan
Health Information Management and Technology (HIMT) Department, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 5;12:471-480. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S279969. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to determine whether there was a time difference between the ambulatory application Asafny and traditional type 997 in reaching people in need and interacting appropriately.
This study was conducted using retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 2120 ambulance requests was extracted from Saudi Red Crescent Authority servers in Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The requests were extracted between 2017 and 2019.
There were no significant differences between the two methods of request. In 2019, the shortest times for all phases of requests were recorded. "Ordinary patient" was the most common cause for requests.
Over the years, efforts by the Saudi Red Crescent Authority facilitated improvements in ambulatory services by adapting new technology and services. This has helped reduce times for all phases of emergency requests.
本研究旨在确定非卧床应用Asafny与传统997型救护车在联系到有需要的人并进行适当互动方面是否存在时间差异。
本研究采用回顾性横断面研究。从沙特阿拉伯王国东部省的沙特红新月会管理局服务器中提取了总共2120份救护车请求。这些请求是在2017年至2019年期间提取的。
两种请求方式之间没有显著差异。2019年,记录了请求各阶段的最短时间。“普通患者”是请求的最常见原因。
多年来,沙特红新月会管理局通过采用新技术和服务,努力促进了非卧床服务的改善。这有助于减少紧急请求各阶段的时间。