Lourdesamy Anthony Albert Iruthiaraj, Zam Zarifah, Hussin Narwani
Respiratory Unit, Hospital Taiping, Taiping, Malaysia.
Microbiology Unit, Hospital Taiping, Taiping, Malaysia.
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Dec;27(6):79-88. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.6.8. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
In real-life practice, only 20% of hospitalised pneumonia cases have an identified etiology. The usage of urine antigen test (LUAT) in developed nations revolutionised case detection rates. Accordingly, our objectives were to study the microbiological etiology for hospitalised pneumonia patients and the diagnosis of pneumonia.
A prospective, observational single-centre study was conducted where all 504 cases that were consecutively admitted for pneumonia were enrolled. Blood and sputum samples obtained were used to identify pathogens using standard microbiological culture methods. The urine samples collected were tested using the Immunocatch immunochromatographic (ICT) urine antigen test.
A microbiological diagnosis was only achieved in 104 cases (20.6%) and a Gram-negative infection predominance was observed. Culture-positive cases required longer hospitalisation (8.46 days versus 5.53 days; < 0.001) and the higher usage of antipseudomonal antibiotics (23.1% versus 8.3%; < 0.001). Only 3 cases (0.6%) were diagnosed with pneumonia.
The local pathogen distribution is diverse compared to other regions. Culture-negative pneumonia is common and significantly differs from culture-positive pneumonia. serotype 1 is not a common cause of pneumonia and LUAT did not help demystify the cause of culture-negative pneumonia.
在实际临床实践中,仅20%的住院肺炎病例能明确病因。发达国家使用尿抗原检测(LUAT)使病例检出率发生了革命性变化。因此,我们的目标是研究住院肺炎患者的微生物病因及肺炎的诊断。
开展了一项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究,纳入了所有504例因肺炎连续入院的病例。采集的血液和痰液样本采用标准微生物培养方法来鉴定病原体。收集的尿液样本使用Immunocatch免疫层析(ICT)尿抗原检测法进行检测。
仅104例(20.6%)获得了微生物学诊断,且观察到革兰阴性菌感染占优势。培养阳性的病例住院时间更长(8.46天对5.53天;P<0.001),抗假单胞菌抗生素的使用频率更高(23.1%对8.3%;P<0.001)。仅3例(0.6%)被诊断为肺炎。
与其他地区相比,当地病原体分布多样。培养阴性的肺炎很常见,且与培养阳性的肺炎有显著差异。1型血清型不是肺炎的常见病因,LUAT无助于揭示培养阴性肺炎的病因。