Suppr超能文献

一项基于医院的肺炎地方流行病学研究,包括军团菌肺炎的贡献。

A Hospital-based Study on the Local Epidemiology of Pneumonia Including the Contribution of Legionella Pneumonia.

作者信息

Lourdesamy Anthony Albert Iruthiaraj, Zam Zarifah, Hussin Narwani

机构信息

Respiratory Unit, Hospital Taiping, Taiping, Malaysia.

Microbiology Unit, Hospital Taiping, Taiping, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays J Med Sci. 2020 Dec;27(6):79-88. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.6.8. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In real-life practice, only 20% of hospitalised pneumonia cases have an identified etiology. The usage of urine antigen test (LUAT) in developed nations revolutionised case detection rates. Accordingly, our objectives were to study the microbiological etiology for hospitalised pneumonia patients and the diagnosis of pneumonia.

METHODS

A prospective, observational single-centre study was conducted where all 504 cases that were consecutively admitted for pneumonia were enrolled. Blood and sputum samples obtained were used to identify pathogens using standard microbiological culture methods. The urine samples collected were tested using the Immunocatch immunochromatographic (ICT) urine antigen test.

RESULTS

A microbiological diagnosis was only achieved in 104 cases (20.6%) and a Gram-negative infection predominance was observed. Culture-positive cases required longer hospitalisation (8.46 days versus 5.53 days; < 0.001) and the higher usage of antipseudomonal antibiotics (23.1% versus 8.3%; < 0.001). Only 3 cases (0.6%) were diagnosed with pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The local pathogen distribution is diverse compared to other regions. Culture-negative pneumonia is common and significantly differs from culture-positive pneumonia. serotype 1 is not a common cause of pneumonia and LUAT did not help demystify the cause of culture-negative pneumonia.

摘要

背景

在实际临床实践中,仅20%的住院肺炎病例能明确病因。发达国家使用尿抗原检测(LUAT)使病例检出率发生了革命性变化。因此,我们的目标是研究住院肺炎患者的微生物病因及肺炎的诊断。

方法

开展了一项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究,纳入了所有504例因肺炎连续入院的病例。采集的血液和痰液样本采用标准微生物培养方法来鉴定病原体。收集的尿液样本使用Immunocatch免疫层析(ICT)尿抗原检测法进行检测。

结果

仅104例(20.6%)获得了微生物学诊断,且观察到革兰阴性菌感染占优势。培养阳性的病例住院时间更长(8.46天对5.53天;P<0.001),抗假单胞菌抗生素的使用频率更高(23.1%对8.3%;P<0.001)。仅3例(0.6%)被诊断为肺炎。

结论

与其他地区相比,当地病原体分布多样。培养阴性的肺炎很常见,且与培养阳性的肺炎有显著差异。1型血清型不是肺炎的常见病因,LUAT无助于揭示培养阴性肺炎的病因。

相似文献

3
Identification of Legionella from clinically diagnosed pneumonia patients and environmental samples.
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2015 Apr;41(1):24-8. doi: 10.3329/bmrcb.v41i1.30230.
10
Non-pneumophila species pneumonia with orange-coloured sputum.非嗜肺军团菌属所致肺炎伴橙色痰液
Respirol Case Rep. 2021 Jul 29;9(9):e0814. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.814. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

4
Tools for outcome prediction in patients with community acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎患者预后预测工具。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;10(2):201-211. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1268051. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验