• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左前降支真性分叉病变中边支处理与患者因素的相关性:GRAND-DES 注册研究的分析。

Association of Side-Branch Treatment and Patient Factors in Left Anterior Descending Artery True Bifurcation Lesions: Analysis from the GRAND-DES Pooled Registry.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 27;2020:8858642. doi: 10.1155/2020/8858642. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/8858642
PMID:33447167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7781708/
Abstract

METHODS

Patients undergoing PCI to left anterior descending (LAD) bifurcation lesions with contemporary DES were analyzed from a nationwide registry. Baseline risk was assessed using the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score. Target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, was assessed at 3 years.

RESULTS

Among 1,089 patients with LAD bifurcation lesions, 548 (50.3%) patients underwent SB treatment. The SB treatment group showed a nonsignificant, but numerically lower rate of 3-year TLF (6.6% vs. 9.2%, HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.44-1.28,  = 0.29). In patients with low pretreatment risk (ACEF<1.22), SB treatment was associated with a lower rate of 3-year TLF (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19-0.96,  = 0.04), while no significant difference was observed in patients with high risk (ACEF≥1.22). The difference in the low risk group was mostly driven by target lesion revascularization (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.08-0.75,  = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SB treatment for LAD bifurcation lesions showed favorable long-term outcomes compared with main-branch-only intervention, especially in patients with low pretreatment risk.

摘要

方法

本研究分析了一项全国性注册研究中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的左前降支(LAD)分叉病变且使用当代 DES 的患者。使用年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分评估基线风险。在 3 年时评估终点事件(TLF),包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建的复合终点。

结果

在 1089 例 LAD 分叉病变患者中,548 例(50.3%)患者接受了边支(SB)治疗。SB 治疗组 3 年 TLF 的发生率虽较低,但无统计学差异(6.6% vs. 9.2%,HR 0.75,95%CI 0.44-1.28, = 0.29)。在低预处理风险(ACEF<1.22)患者中,SB 治疗与较低的 3 年 TLF 发生率相关(HR 0.43,95%CI 0.19-0.96, = 0.04),而在高风险患者(ACEF≥1.22)中未观察到显著差异。低风险组的差异主要归因于靶病变血运重建(HR 0.24,95%CI 0.08-0.75, = 0.01)。

结论

与仅主支干预相比,SB 治疗 LAD 分叉病变显示出良好的长期结局,尤其是在低预处理风险患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/1d1def43e40c/JITC2020-8858642.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/3731990e4922/JITC2020-8858642.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/a470c2076a0c/JITC2020-8858642.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/18fefbe1a99f/JITC2020-8858642.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/2587504172d8/JITC2020-8858642.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/1d1def43e40c/JITC2020-8858642.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/3731990e4922/JITC2020-8858642.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/a470c2076a0c/JITC2020-8858642.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/18fefbe1a99f/JITC2020-8858642.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/2587504172d8/JITC2020-8858642.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ab4/7781708/1d1def43e40c/JITC2020-8858642.005.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Side-Branch Treatment and Patient Factors in Left Anterior Descending Artery True Bifurcation Lesions: Analysis from the GRAND-DES Pooled Registry.左前降支真性分叉病变中边支处理与患者因素的相关性:GRAND-DES 注册研究的分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 27;2020:8858642. doi: 10.1155/2020/8858642. eCollection 2020.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
3
Differential Prognostic Effect Between First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.冠状动脉分叉病变中第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架的预后差异:韩国分叉队列的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1318-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.014.
4
Clinical Implications of Bifurcation Angles in Left Main Bifurcation Intervention Using a Two-Stent Technique.左主干分叉病变双支架技术中分叉角度的临床意义。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 11;2020:2475930. doi: 10.1155/2020/2475930. eCollection 2020.
5
Major Predictors of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions With 2-Stent Strategy: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉分叉病变双支架策略的长期临床结局的主要预测因素:韩国分叉队列的患者水平分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 26;9(18):1879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.左主干病变与非左主干分叉病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的治疗策略对预后的影响差异:COBIS(冠状动脉分叉病变支架置入)注册研究 II 的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
7
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
8
Prevalence, predictors, prognostic significance, and effect of techniques on outcomes of coronary lesion calcification following implantation of drug-eluting stents: a patient-level pooled analysis of stent-specific, multicenter, prospective IRIS-DES registries.药物洗脱支架置入术后冠状动脉病变钙化的流行率、预测因素、预后意义及技术对结局的影响:支架特异性、多中心、前瞻性 IRIS-DES 注册研究的患者水平汇总分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Jan;32(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000896.
9
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
10
Comparison of simple versus complex stenting in patients with true distal left main bifurcation lesions.真左主干分叉病变患者单纯支架术与复杂支架术的对比。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):776-785. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29219. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes After Bifurcation PCI: It Still Matters.分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的预测因素:仍然很重要。
JACC Asia. 2022 Sep 20;2(5):619-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.07.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Insights from the Multicenter Grand-DES Registry.真实世界实践中第二代药物洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:来自多中心大型 DES 注册研究的见解。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Feb 26;2020:3872704. doi: 10.1155/2020/3872704. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical outcomes of long stenting in the drug-eluting stent era: patient-level pooled analysis from the GRAND-DES registry.药物洗脱支架时代长支架的临床结果:GRAND-DES 注册研究的患者水平汇总分析。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1318-1325. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00296.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗阻塞性分叉病变:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的第 14 份共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2019 May 20;15(1):90-98. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00144.
4
OCT-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions.光学相干断层扫描引导下的分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Interv Cardiol. 2019 Feb;14(1):5-9. doi: 10.15420/icr.2018.17.2.
5
Predictive ability of ACEF and ACEF II score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the GLOBAL LEADERS study.在 GLOBAL LEADERS 研究中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,ACEF 和 ACEF II 评分的预测能力。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;286:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.043. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Determines Outcome After 2- But Not 1-Stent Strategy in Left Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中 2 支架策略而非 1 支架策略后双联抗血小板治疗时间决定结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2453-2463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.020.
7
Joint consensus on the use of OCT in coronary bifurcation lesions by the European and Japanese bifurcation clubs.欧洲分叉俱乐部和日本分叉俱乐部关于 OCT 在冠状动脉分叉病变中应用的联合共识。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1568-e1577. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00391.
8
Temporal changes in characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes of coronary bifurcation lesion interventions.冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗的特征、治疗策略及结果的时间变化。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jan;30(1):33-43. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000672.
9
Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗临床试验终点标准化定义:学术研究联合会-2 共识文件。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 14;39(23):2192-2207. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy223.
10
Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分的预测价值。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.134. Epub 2018 Jun 1.