Suppr超能文献

一种治疗近端指间关节的新方法:掌侧斜切口——一项回顾性队列研究。

A novel approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint: The volar oblique incision - a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Saun Tomas J, Truong Jessica L, Ahluwalia Romy, Richards Robert R

机构信息

The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Scars Burn Heal. 2020 Dec 28;6:2059513120981941. doi: 10.1177/2059513120981941. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach to the volar structures in the digits must be designed to provide adequate exposure of tendons, vessels and nerves but also in a way that prevents flexion contracture of the digit as the scar contracts. This is traditionally done using a zigzag 'Bruner' incision, first described by Dr Julian M Bruner in 1967. In this paper, we describe an alternative approach, the Volar Oblique incision, and present a single institutional cohort of patients who have undergone procedures beginning with this approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on eight cases that involved a Bruner incision and eight similar cases that involved a volar oblique incision. Charts were reviewed for demographic data. Patients were asked to return to clinic postoperatively for scar assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), where lower scores correspond to more favourable scar characteristics. The average follow-up period was 22 months. While in clinic, standard joint measurements were taken to assess for any proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. Demographics and questionnaire data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data and quantitative joint measurements were analysed using Student's -test.

RESULTS

There was no difference in flexion contracture between the two groups. The POSAS patient score for scar irregularity was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, but there was no difference in any of the other subcategories, the total patient score, nor the overall patient opinion. The total POSAS observer score was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, with lower scores in the scar thickness, observed relief and observed pliability subcategories as well as the overall observer opinion.

CONCLUSION

The volar oblique incision appears to be satisfactory alternative to the classic Bruner incision in hand surgery that requires volar exposure of the digits. Future studies are needed to assess the validity of these findings on a larger scale.

LAY SUMMARY

There are various types of incisions that surgeons use when they operate on fingers. When choosing an incision, it is important that the incision provides good exposure to the deeper structures but does not form a tight scar that limits movement of the finger (contracture).A commonly used incision for the palmar side of the finger is the zig-zag or 'Bruner' incision. Some people, however, find this zig-zag scar unappealing. We started using a single diagonal incision, which we have called the volar oblique, instead of the zig-zag Bruner for access to the middle joint of the finger. We wanted to describe the volar oblique technique and then compare the quality of these two scars and also assess if one limits movement of the finger more than the other.Our research found no differences in finger contracture between groups. We did, however, find that patients reported scar irregularity more favourably in the volar oblique group and that surgeons rated scar thickness, relief (roughness) and pliability of the volar oblique scar higher than that of the zig-zag Bruner scar.This research presents a novel surgical technique and compares its results with respect to scar quality and finger contracture to the more traditional zig-zag Bruner approach.

摘要

背景

手指掌侧结构的手术入路设计必须既能充分暴露肌腱、血管和神经,又能防止瘢痕挛缩导致手指屈曲挛缩。传统上采用锯齿状的“布鲁纳(Bruner)”切口,由朱利安·M·布鲁纳医生于1967年首次描述。在本文中,我们描述了一种替代方法——掌侧斜切口,并展示了一组采用该入路进行手术的单中心患者队列。

方法

对8例采用布鲁纳切口的病例和8例采用掌侧斜切口的类似病例进行了回顾性队列研究。查阅病历以获取人口统计学数据。患者术后返回诊所,使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)进行瘢痕评估,分数越低表明瘢痕特征越理想。平均随访期为22个月。在诊所时,进行标准关节测量以评估是否存在近端指间关节挛缩。使用非参数数据的曼-惠特尼U检验分析人口统计学和问卷数据,使用学生t检验分析定量关节测量数据。

结果

两组之间的屈曲挛缩无差异。掌侧斜切口组的POSAS患者瘢痕不规则评分低于布鲁纳切口组,但在其他任何子类别、患者总分或患者总体评价方面均无差异。掌侧斜切口组的POSAS观察者总分低于布鲁纳切口组,在瘢痕厚度、观察到的缓解程度和观察到的柔韧性子类别以及观察者总体评价方面得分更低。

结论

在需要手指掌侧暴露的手部手术中,掌侧斜切口似乎是经典布鲁纳切口的令人满意的替代方法。未来需要进行更大规模的研究来评估这些发现的有效性。

简要总结

外科医生在对手指进行手术时会使用多种类型的切口。选择切口时,重要的是切口能很好地暴露深层结构,但不会形成限制手指活动的紧绷瘢痕(挛缩)。手指掌侧常用的切口是锯齿状或“布鲁纳”切口。然而,有些人觉得这种锯齿状瘢痕不美观。我们开始使用单一的对角切口,即掌侧斜切口,而不是锯齿状的布鲁纳切口来进入手指的中间关节。我们想描述掌侧斜切口技术,然后比较这两种瘢痕的质量,并评估其中一种是否比另一种更限制手指活动。我们的研究发现两组之间手指挛缩无差异。然而,我们确实发现患者对掌侧斜切口组的瘢痕不规则评价更好,并且外科医生对掌侧斜切口瘢痕的厚度、缓解程度(粗糙度)和柔韧性的评分高于锯齿状布鲁纳瘢痕。本研究提出了一种新的手术技术,并将其在瘢痕质量和手指挛缩方面的结果与更传统的锯齿状布鲁纳方法进行了比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b8d/7780168/afb437007f04/10.1177_2059513120981941-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验