Tamura Shota, Yoshiyama Tomotaka, Doi Atsushi, Yoshiyama Minoru
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020 Dec 2;4(6):1-6. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa469. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) represents an efficient alternative to transvenous ICD in patients who do not require pacing. The intraoperative defibrillation test (DFT) is recommended during S-ICD implantation to confirm appropriate sensing and successful 65-J termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, few cases of oversensing of noise inhibiting therapies have been reported.
We report the case of a 50-year-old man who underwent S-ICD implantation for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Immediately after S-ICD implantation, VF was induced using a 50-Hz burst; however, shock was not delivered owing to sustained noise on the electrogram in the primary vector. Therefore, an external rescue shock was needed at 150 J. We changed the sensing vector from primary to secondary and performed a second DFT. The S-ICD could deliver an appropriate shock and was able to successfully terminate VF without noise markers in the secondary vector. During the second DFT, one back-up pacing was delivered after the shock; the sensing vector then automatically switched from the secondary to the alternate vector. However, noise was observed in the alternate vector despite sinus rhythm restoration.
The present case demonstrated that noise was recorded in two different vectors during DFT, possibly supporting the hypothesis that the muscle spasm of the diaphragm induced by the 50-Hz burst causes oversensing of noise by the S-ICD.
皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)是不需要起搏的患者经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器的有效替代方案。在植入S-ICD期间建议进行术中除颤测试(DFT),以确认适当的感知以及能否成功以65焦耳终止诱发的心室颤动(VF)。然而,很少有关于噪声抑制治疗感知过度的病例报道。
我们报告了一名50岁男性的病例,该患者因心脏性猝死的二级预防接受了S-ICD植入。在植入S-ICD后立即使用50赫兹猝发刺激诱发VF;然而,由于主向量心电图上持续出现噪声,未发放电击。因此,需要150焦耳的体外抢救电击。我们将感知向量从主向量改为次向量,并进行了第二次DFT。S-ICD能够发放适当的电击,并能够在次向量中成功终止VF且无噪声标记。在第二次DFT期间,电击后发放了一次备用起搏;然后感知向量自动从次向量切换到备用向量。然而,尽管恢复了窦性心律,但在备用向量中仍观察到噪声。
本病例表明,在DFT期间,在两个不同向量中记录到了噪声,这可能支持以下假设,即50赫兹猝发刺激诱发的膈肌肌肉痉挛导致S-ICD对噪声的感知过度。