Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Endodontology, University Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Private practice Meller Zahngesundheit, Waiblingen, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jul;25(7):4579-4589. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03772-w. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
This study investigated the fluorescence properties of the most commonly used fluorescent CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations and their suitability to perform the fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT).
A total of 175 different color shades (n = 1) from 13 CAD/CAM material brands were analyzed with a monochromator-based microplate reader. Additionally, dentin, enamel, and combined dentin-enamel specimens (respectively, n = 11) were analyzed for comparison purposes. The maximum fluorescence intensity, the corresponding excitation and emission wavelength, and the total fluorescence for the wavelength spectrum λ = 395 nm - 415 nm used for FIT were determined.
All assessed CAD/CAM ceramics showed virtually no total fluorescence for the wavelength spectrum λ = 395 nm - 415 nm used for FIT. CERASMART, KZR-CAD HD 2, and LuxaCam Composite displayed total fluorescence values similar to that of the tooth hard substances. All other resin-based CAD/CAM materials showed a significantly higher total fluorescence than the tooth hard substances.
Apart from the mentioned exceptions, all CAD/CAM materials assessed could be suitable for the FIT, either because they are more fluorescent than hard tooth substances or because they do not fluoresce at all at the respective wavelength of λ = 395 nm - 415 nm.
This study provides insight into the not yet well-known fluorescent properties of dental CAD/CAM materials. This knowledge is not only necessary to reproduce the fluorescence properties of natural teeth but also for the applicability of diagnostic fluorescence inducing techniques.
本研究调查了用于整体牙科修复的最常用的荧光 CAD/CAM 材料的荧光特性及其是否适合执行荧光辅助识别技术(FIT)。
使用基于单色仪的微孔板读数器分析了来自 13 个 CAD/CAM 材料品牌的 175 种不同颜色色调(n = 1)。此外,还分析了牙本质、牙釉质和牙本质-牙釉质组合标本(分别为 n = 11)进行比较。确定了用于 FIT 的波长谱 λ = 395nm-415nm 的最大荧光强度、相应的激发和发射波长以及总荧光。
所有评估的 CAD/CAM 陶瓷在用于 FIT 的波长谱 λ = 395nm-415nm 下几乎没有总荧光。CERASMART、KZR-CAD HD 2 和 LuxaCam Composite 的总荧光值与牙硬组织相似。所有其他基于树脂的 CAD/CAM 材料的总荧光值均明显高于牙硬组织。
除了上述例外情况,评估的所有 CAD/CAM 材料都可以适用于 FIT,要么是因为它们比牙硬组织更具荧光性,要么是因为它们在相应的 λ = 395nm-415nm 波长下根本不发光。
本研究提供了对牙科 CAD/CAM 材料尚未充分了解的荧光特性的深入了解。这种知识不仅对于复制天然牙齿的荧光特性是必要的,而且对于诊断荧光诱导技术的适用性也是必要的。