• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节表面病变的膝关节治疗的无细胞基于硬珊瑚钙支架: 3 年的后续案例系列。

Joint Surface Lesions in the Knee Treated with an Acellular Aragonite-Based Scaffold: A 3-Year Follow-Up Case Series.

机构信息

MoRe Foundation, Antwerp, Belgium.

Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1217S-1227S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520988164. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1177/1947603520988164
PMID:33448238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8808874/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome and repair capacity of a cell-free aragonite-based scaffold in patients with an isolated symptomatic joint surface lesion (JSL) of the knee.

DESIGN

Thirteen patients (age 33.5 ± 8.9; female 23%; body mass index 25.3 ± 3.4, K/L [Kellgren-Lawrence] 1.8) with a JSL (2.6 ± 1.7 cm [1.0-7.5 cm]) of the distal femur were enrolled in a single-center prospective case series. Safety and clinical outcome was assessed by the KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scale at baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months follow-up. The MOCART 2.0 and scaffold integration were evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging at 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Primary outcome (KOOS pain) improved with 36.5 ± 14.7 points at 12 months ( = 0.002) and 41.2 ± 14.7 points at 36 months ( = 0.002) follow-up. Similar increasing trends were observed for the other KOOS subscales, IKDC, and Lysholm score, which were significantly better at each follow-up time point relative to baseline ( < 0.05). Activity level increased from 2.75 ± 1.6 to 4.6 ± 2.2 points at final follow-up ( = 0.07). The MOCART was 61.7 ± 12.6 at 12 months and 72.9 ± 13.0 at 36 months postoperatively. Sixty-six to 100% implant integration and remodeling was observed in 73.3% cases at 36 months. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the biphasic aragonite-based scaffold is a safe and clinically effective implant for treating small-medium sized JSLs of the distal femur in a young and active patient cohort. The implant showed satisfying osteointegration and restoration of the osteochondral unit up to 3 years postimplantation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一种无细胞方解石基支架在膝关节孤立性关节表面病变(JSL)患者中的临床疗效和修复能力。

设计

本研究纳入了 13 名(年龄 33.5 ± 8.9 岁;女性占 23%;体重指数 25.3 ± 3.4,K/L [Kellgren-Lawrence] 1.8)存在股骨远端 JSL(2.6 ± 1.7 cm [1.0-7.5 cm])的患者,进行单中心前瞻性病例系列研究。通过 KOOS(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎评分)、IKDC(国际膝关节文献委员会)、Lysholm 和 Tegner 活动量表在基线和 6、12、18、24 和 36 个月随访时评估安全性和临床结果。在术后 12、24 和 36 个月时通过 MOCART 2.0 和支架整合情况进行磁共振成像评估。

结果

主要结局(KOOS 疼痛)在 12 个月时改善了 36.5 ± 14.7 分( = 0.002),在 36 个月时改善了 41.2 ± 14.7 分( = 0.002)。其他 KOOS 亚量表、IKDC 和 Lysholm 评分也呈现出类似的增加趋势,在每个随访时间点与基线相比均有显著改善( < 0.05)。活动水平从基线时的 2.75 ± 1.6 分增加到最终随访时的 4.6 ± 2.2 分( = 0.07)。术后 12 个月时的 MOCART 为 61.7 ± 12.6,术后 36 个月时为 72.9 ± 13.0。在 36 个月时,66%至 100%的植入物整合和重塑在 73.3%的病例中观察到。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

本研究表明,双相方解石基支架是一种安全且临床有效的植入物,可用于治疗年轻、活跃患者的股骨远端中小面积 JSL。植入物在植入后 3 年内表现出令人满意的骨整合和修复。

相似文献

1
Joint Surface Lesions in the Knee Treated with an Acellular Aragonite-Based Scaffold: A 3-Year Follow-Up Case Series.关节表面病变的膝关节治疗的无细胞基于硬珊瑚钙支架: 3 年的后续案例系列。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1217S-1227S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520988164. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Aragonite-Based Scaffold for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions in Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritic Knees: Results of a 2-Year Multicenter Prospective Study.基于文石相的骨支架治疗轻中度膝骨关节炎关节面病变:一项为期 2 年的多中心前瞻性研究结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(3):588-598. doi: 10.1177/0363546520981750. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
3
Aragonite-Based Scaffold Versus Microfracture and Debridement for the Treatment of Knee Chondral and Osteochondral Lesions: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.基于文石相的骨支架与微骨折术和清创术治疗膝关节软骨和骨软骨病变的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):957-967. doi: 10.1177/03635465231151252. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
A novel aragonite-based scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: early experience on human implants and technical developments.一种用于骨软骨再生的新型文石基支架:人体植入物的早期经验和技术进展。
Injury. 2016 Dec;47 Suppl 6:S27-S32. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30836-1.
5
Clinical results and MRI evolution of a nano-composite multilayered biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration at 5 years.5 年临床结果和 MRI 演变:纳米复合多层生物材料在骨软骨再生中的应用。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):158-65. doi: 10.1177/0363546513505434. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Poor osteochondral repair by a biomimetic collagen scaffold: 1- to 3-year clinical and radiological follow-up.仿生胶原蛋白支架修复骨软骨效果不佳:1至3年临床及影像学随访
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2380-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3538-3. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
7
Treatment of Large Knee Osteochondral Lesions With a Biomimetic Scaffold: Results of a Multicenter Study of 49 Patients at 2-Year Follow-up.使用仿生支架治疗大型膝关节骨软骨损伤:一项针对49例患者的多中心研究2年随访结果
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1607-17. doi: 10.1177/0363546514530292. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Treatment of Knee Osteochondritis Dissecans With a Cell-Free Biomimetic Osteochondral Scaffold: Clinical and Imaging Findings at Midterm Follow-up.采用无细胞仿生骨软骨支架治疗膝关节剥脱性骨软骨炎:中期随访的临床和影像学结果
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):314-321. doi: 10.1177/0363546517737763. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
[Two-Year Results of Modified AMIC Technique for Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee].改良 AMIC 技术治疗膝关节软骨缺损的两年结果
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(3):167-174.
10
Successful osteoconduction but limited cartilage tissue quality following osteochondral repair by a cell-free multilayered nano-composite scaffold at the knee.膝关节采用无细胞多层纳米复合支架进行骨软骨修复后,骨传导成功但软骨组织质量有限。
Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):625-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3118-2. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Biointegrative Nail Raftering Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Subchondral Insufficiency of the Knee.生物整合式钉棒技术改善膝关节软骨下骨缺损患者的疼痛及功能。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Feb 10;7(3):101105. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101105. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Cell-Free Aragonite-Based Scaffold With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee.用于膝关节骨软骨缺损的无细胞文石基支架联合浓缩骨髓抽吸物增强术
Video J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 26;5(3):26350254241303767. doi: 10.1177/26350254241303767. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
3
Clinical Experience With an Aragonite-Based Scaffold Implant for Knee Cartilage Repair: A Multicenter Case Series.基于文石的膝关节软骨修复支架植入的临床经验:多中心病例系列
Cureus. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Report on Evolving Indications, Techniques, and Outcome of Novel and Innovative Surgical procedure - Agili C®.新型创新手术程序——Agili C®的适应症、技术及结果进展报告
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Apr;18(4):124-132. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09951-0. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Tissue engineering strategies hold promise for the repair of articular cartilage injury.组织工程策略有望修复关节软骨损伤。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Sep 11;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01260-w.
6
Acellular Aragonite-Based Scaffold for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions of the Knee: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study.基于脱细胞珊瑚钙的膝关节面损伤治疗支架:至少 5 年随访研究。
Cartilage. 2024 Dec;15(4):399-406. doi: 10.1177/19476035241227346. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
Failure of cartilage regeneration: emerging hypotheses and related therapeutic strategies.软骨再生失败:新出现的假说和相关治疗策略。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023 Jul;19(7):403-416. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-00979-5. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
8
Multi-layer cell-free scaffolds for osteochondral defects of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical evidence.用于膝关节骨软骨缺损的多层无细胞支架:临床证据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Jul 30;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00377-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconstruction of Large Osteochondral Defects Using a Hemicondylar Aragonite-Based Implant in a Caprine Model.使用基于扇形珊瑚的植入物在山羊模型中重建大型骨软骨缺损。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul;36(7):1884-1894. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 Knee Score and Atlas.MOCART(磁共振观察软骨修复组织)2.0 膝关节评分及图谱
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):571S-587S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519865308. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
MaioRegen Osteochondral Substitute for the Treatment of Knee Defects: A Systematic Review of the Literature.迈奥再生骨软骨替代物治疗膝关节缺损:文献系统评价
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):783. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060783.
4
Osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells is enhanced by an aragonite scaffold.方解石支架增强人骨髓间充质干细胞的成骨分化。
Differentiation. 2019 May-Jun;107:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Agili-C implant promotes the regenerative capacity of articular cartilage defects in an ex vivo model.Agili-C 植入物在体外模型中促进关节软骨缺损的再生能力。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1953-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5263-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
6
Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.骨替代物:其特性、临床应用及大骨缺损治疗前景综述
J Tissue Eng. 2018 Jun 4;9:2041731418776819. doi: 10.1177/2041731418776819. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
7
Clinical and radiological outcome for Trufit Plug in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions at a minimum of 2 years.Trufit软骨塞治疗软骨和骨软骨损伤至少2年的临床及影像学结果
J Orthop. 2018 Jan 10;15(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Clinical Outcomes and Failure Rates of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee: A Systematic Review.关节镜下微骨折术与富血小板血浆注射治疗膝关节骨软骨损伤的随机对照研究
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3541-3549. doi: 10.1177/0363546517732531. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
A novel aragonite-based scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: early experience on human implants and technical developments.一种用于骨软骨再生的新型文石基支架:人体植入物的早期经验和技术进展。
Injury. 2016 Dec;47 Suppl 6:S27-S32. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30836-1.
10
Long-term Outcomes After Osteochondral Autograft Transfer: A Systematic Review at Mean Follow-up of 10.2 Years.自体骨软骨移植后的长期疗效:平均随访10.2年的系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1174-84. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.037. Epub 2016 Feb 19.