University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP10196-NP10219. doi: 10.1177/0886260520985482. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
This study of a South Asian community in the midwestern USA examines what bystanders do when they witness an incident of intimate partner violence (IPV). Because of ethical and safety constraints, in lieu of observation in a natural setting, data were collected at a Peerformance, a peer-led IPV prevention program, using the forum theatre method introduced in Augusto Boal's . Event attendees were invited to respond to an IPV incident enacted by peer educators in which a controlling husband's behavior escalates to the point of suggesting physical violence. Using a grounded theory approach, we analyzed the videotaped bystander actions while applying pertinent aspects of visual analysis. Event attendees responded in variety of ways, exploring and/or de-escalating the situation, providing information, and encouraging the couple to resolve their conflict and/or seek outside help. They expressed empathy, support, and (dis)agreement with the husband and the wife. Their actions encompassed a number of dimensions: introductory, investigative, supportive/empathic, informational, instructional, instrumental, and confrontational. Participants' vastly varied responses to IPV within the same scenario suggest difficulty in developing a generic IPV bystander program. The findings also suggest possible directions for developing bystander programs to address IPV. In lieu of prescribing and/or proscribing specific actions in a given risk situation, bystander training can help participants build their repertoire of actions while collectively examining the strengths and limitations of various actions in their sociocultural context. Such bystander training is complex and difficult to manualize; it will involve reflexive and critical discussions and learning and trying out various possible alternatives. A Peerformance is a site of action, a realistic and familiar milieu where community members can imagine and try out interventions that may be different from the norm of indifference and non-intervention. It can open up new possibilities for addressing IPV in diverse communities.
本研究以美国中西部的一个南亚社区为对象,考察了当旁观者目睹亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)事件时他们会怎么做。由于伦理和安全方面的限制,本研究无法在自然环境中进行观察,因此数据是在 Peerformance 收集的,这是一个由同龄人领导的 IPV 预防项目,使用了 Augusto Boal 的. 论坛剧场方法。活动参与者被邀请对由同伴教育者上演的 IPV 事件做出反应,在该事件中,一个控制欲强的丈夫的行为升级到建议使用身体暴力的程度。我们使用扎根理论方法,分析了录像中的旁观者行为,同时应用了视觉分析的相关方面。活动参与者以各种方式做出回应,探索和/或缓解局势,提供信息,并鼓励夫妻解决冲突和/或寻求外部帮助。他们对丈夫和妻子表示同情、支持和(不同意)。他们的行为包括介绍、调查、支持/同情、信息、指导、工具和对抗性等多个方面。在同一个场景中,参与者对 IPV 的反应差异很大,这表明难以制定通用的 IPV 旁观者计划。研究结果还为制定解决 IPV 的旁观者计划提供了可能的方向。旁观者培训可以帮助参与者在集体审查各种行动在其社会文化背景下的优势和局限性的同时,建立他们的行动方案,而不是在给定的风险情况下规定和/或禁止特定的行动。这种旁观者培训很复杂,难以手册化;它将涉及反思性和批判性讨论以及学习和尝试各种可能的替代方案。Peerformance 是一个行动场所,是一个现实而熟悉的环境,社区成员可以在其中想象和尝试不同于冷漠和不干预的常态的干预措施。它可以为解决不同社区的 IPV 问题开辟新的可能性。