Suppr超能文献

心理社会干预对乳腺癌女性和前列腺癌男性疲劳影响的调节因素:个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。

Moderators of the effect of psychosocial interventions on fatigue in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer: Individual patient data meta-analyses.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1772-1785. doi: 10.1002/pon.5522. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Psychosocial interventions can reduce cancer-related fatigue effectively. However, it is still unclear if intervention effects differ across subgroups of patients. These meta-analyses aimed at evaluating moderator effects of (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) clinical characteristics, (c) baseline levels of fatigue and other symptoms, and (d) intervention-related characteristics on the effect of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with non-metastatic breast and prostate cancer.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium. Potential moderators were studied with meta-analyses of pooled individual patient data from 14 randomized controlled trials through linear mixed-effects models with interaction tests. The analyses were conducted separately in patients with breast (n = 1091) and prostate cancer (n = 1008).

RESULTS

Statistically significant, small overall effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue were found (breast cancer: β = -0.19 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = -0.30; -0.08]; prostate cancer: β = -0.11 [95%CI = -0.21; -0.00]). In both patient groups, intervention effects did not differ significantly by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics, nor by baseline levels of fatigue or pain. For intervention-related moderators (only tested among women with breast cancer), statistically significant larger effects were found for cognitive behavioral therapy as intervention strategy (β = -0.27 [95%CI = -0.40; -0.15]), fatigue-specific interventions (β = -0.48 [95%CI = -0.79; -0.18]), and interventions that only targeted patients with clinically relevant fatigue (β = -0.85 [95%CI = -1.40; -0.30]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings did not provide evidence that any selected demographic or clinical characteristic, or baseline levels of fatigue or pain, moderated effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue. A specific focus on decreasing fatigue seems beneficial for patients with breast cancer with clinically relevant fatigue.

摘要

目的

心理社会干预可以有效减轻癌症相关疲劳。然而,干预效果是否因患者亚组而异仍不清楚。这些荟萃分析旨在评估(a)社会人口统计学特征、(b)临床特征、(c)疲劳和其他症状的基线水平以及(d)干预相关特征对非转移性乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者的心理社会干预对癌症相关疲劳的影响的调节作用。

方法

从预测癌症康复和支持性护理的最佳方案(POLARIS)联合会检索数据。通过线性混合效应模型与交互检验,对来自 14 项随机对照试验的个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,研究潜在的调节因素。分别在乳腺癌患者(n=1091)和前列腺癌患者(n=1008)中进行分析。

结果

发现心理社会干预对疲劳的总体影响较小,但具有统计学意义(乳腺癌:β=-0.19 [95%置信区间(95%CI)=-0.30;-0.08];前列腺癌:β=-0.11 [95%CI=-0.21;-0.00])。在两组患者中,干预效果在社会人口统计学或临床特征方面、在疲劳或疼痛的基线水平方面均无显著差异。对于干预相关的调节因素(仅在乳腺癌女性患者中进行测试),发现认知行为疗法作为干预策略的效果显著更大(β=-0.27 [95%CI=-0.40;-0.15])、针对疲劳的干预措施(β=-0.48 [95%CI=-0.79;-0.18])以及仅针对有临床相关疲劳的患者的干预措施(β=-0.85 [95%CI=-1.40;-0.30])。

结论

我们的研究结果没有提供任何选定的人口统计学或临床特征、疲劳或疼痛的基线水平调节心理社会干预对疲劳效果的证据。针对有临床相关疲劳的乳腺癌患者,专门关注减轻疲劳似乎是有益的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验