Safety and image quality of MR-conditional external fixators for 1.5 Tesla extremity MR.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and image quality of extremity MR examinations performed with two MR conditional external fixators located in the MR bore.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of a prospectively maintained imaging dataset that evaluated MR examinations of extremities in patients managed with external fixations instrumentation and imaged on a single 1.5T MR scanner. The fixation device was one of two MR-conditional instrumentation systems: DuPuy Synthes (aluminum, stainless steel, carbonium and Kevlar) or Dolphix temporary fixation system (PEEK-CA30). Safety events were recorded by the performing MR radiologic technologist. A study musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all sequences to evaluate for image quality, signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR/CNR), and injury patterns/findings.

RESULTS

In the 13 men and 9 women with a mean age of 42 years (range 18 to 72 years), most patients (19/22 patients; 86%) were involved with trauma resulting in extremity injury requiring external fixation. MR examinations included 19 knee, 2 ankle, and 1 elbow examinations. There were no adverse safety events, heating that caused patient discomfort, fixation dislodgement/perturbment, or early termination of MR examinations. All examinations were of diagnostic quality. Fat-suppressed proton density sequences had significantly higher SNR and CNR compared to STIR (p = 0.01 to 0.04). The lower SNR of STIR and increased quality of fat-suppressed proton density during the study period led to the STIR sequence being dropped in standard MR protocol.

CONCLUSION

MR of the extremity using the two study MR conditional external fixators within the MR bore is safe and feasible.