Cinque Mark E, Godin Jonathan A, Moatshe Gilbert, Chahla Jorge, Kruckeberg Bradley M, Pogorzelski Jonas, LaPrade Robert F
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Aug 15;5(8):2325967117723895. doi: 10.1177/2325967117723895. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Tibial plateau fractures account for a small portion of all fractures; however, these fractures can pose a surgical challenge when occurring concomitantly with ligament injuries.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of soft tissue reconstruction with or without a concomitant tibial plateau fracture and open reduction internal fixation. We hypothesized that patients with a concomitant tibial plateau fracture at the time of soft tissue surgery would have inferior outcomes compared with patients without an associated tibial plateau fracture.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Forty patients were included in this study: 8 in the fracture group and 32 in the matched control group. Inclusion criteria for the fracture group included patients who were at least 18 years old at the time of surgery and sustained a tibial plateau fracture and a concomitant injury of the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, or fibular collateral ligament in isolation or any combination of cruciate or collateral ligaments and who subsequently underwent isolated or combined ligament reconstruction. Patients were excluded if they underwent prior ipsilateral knee surgery, sustained additional bony injuries, or sustained an isolated extra-articular ligament injury at the time of injury. Each patient with a fracture was matched with 4 patients from a control group who had no evidence of a tibial plateau fracture but underwent the same soft tissue reconstruction procedure.
Patients in the fracture group improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively with respect to Short Form-12 ( < .05) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total scores ( < .05). The Lysholm ( = .075) and Tegner scores ( = .086) also improved, although this was not statistically significant. Patients in the control group improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively across all measured scores. A comparison of the postoperative results between the 2 groups showed no statistically significant difference.
The presence of a tibial plateau fracture in conjunction with a ligamentous knee injury did not have a negative effect on postoperative patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcome scores after surgery in both the fracture and control groups improved beyond the minimally clinically important difference, indicating that the presence of a fracture did not detract from the outcomes observed in patients without fractures undergoing concomitant ligament reconstruction.
胫骨平台骨折在所有骨折中占比小;然而,这些骨折与韧带损伤同时发生时会带来手术挑战。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较伴或不伴胫骨平台骨折及切开复位内固定的软组织重建的2年疗效。我们假设软组织手术时伴有胫骨平台骨折的患者与无相关胫骨平台骨折的患者相比,疗效较差。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
本研究纳入40例患者:骨折组8例,匹配对照组32例。骨折组的纳入标准包括手术时年龄至少18岁、发生胫骨平台骨折且伴有孤立的前交叉韧带、后交叉韧带、内侧副韧带或腓侧副韧带损伤,或伴有交叉韧带或侧副韧带的任何组合损伤,随后接受孤立或联合韧带重建的患者。如果患者先前接受过同侧膝关节手术、遭受额外的骨损伤或受伤时仅发生关节外韧带损伤,则排除在外。骨折组的每例患者与对照组的4例患者匹配,对照组患者无胫骨平台骨折证据,但接受相同的软组织重建手术。
骨折组患者从术前到术后在简明健康调查量表-12(<.05)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数总分(<.05)方面有显著改善。Lysholm评分(=.075)和Tegner评分(=.086)也有所改善,尽管这无统计学意义。对照组患者在所有测量评分方面从术前到术后均有显著改善。两组术后结果比较无统计学显著差异。
胫骨平台骨折与膝关节韧带损伤同时存在对术后患者报告的疗效无负面影响。骨折组和对照组术后患者报告的疗效评分改善超过最小临床重要差异,表明骨折的存在并未减损接受同期韧带重建的无骨折患者所观察到的疗效。