工作人员对使用连续视频监测与使用坐班相比的满意度和技术接受度。
Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance of Staff Regarding Use of Continuous Video Monitoring in Comparison With Sitters.
机构信息
Author Affiliations: Senior Clinician (Dr Hebb) and Programmatic Nurse Specialist (Dr George), UPMC Shadyside Hospital; and Program Director of Healthcare Data Analytics and Health Management (Dr Kistler), and Mathematics and Data Analytics Department Chair (Dr Zamboni), Carlow University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This study was conducted while Dr. Hebb was a DNP student at Carlow University.
出版信息
J Nurs Adm. 2021 Feb 1;51(2):60-62. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000970.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine staff satisfaction and technology acceptance of continuous video monitoring (CVM) in comparison to sitters.
BACKGROUND
Traditionally, sitters have been used to prevent falls in hospitals. Continuous video monitoring has emerged to reduce costs associated with sitters while maintaining safety.
METHODS
A descriptive online survey using a modified version of the Technology Acceptance Model was used to gain insight on technology acceptance and satisfaction levels of clinical staff related to CVM.
RESULTS
Only 12.73% found CVM to be as effective as sitters. Statistical significance was shown comparing sitters with CVM. A positive correlation was found with perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of CVM.
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding staff satisfaction and technology acceptance is imperative for nurse leaders and administration when implementing new technologies.
目的
本研究旨在确定工作人员对连续视频监控（CVM）的满意度和技术接受程度，并将其与坐班人员进行比较。
背景
传统上，医院使用坐班人员来防止患者跌倒。连续视频监控的出现降低了与坐班相关的成本，同时保持了安全性。
方法
使用经过修改的技术接受模型描述性在线调查，深入了解临床工作人员对 CVM 的技术接受度和满意度。
结果
只有 12.73%的人认为 CVM 与坐班人员一样有效。坐班人员与 CVM 之间的比较具有统计学意义。研究发现 CVM 的易用性和有用性与感知呈正相关。
结论
对于实施新技术的护士领导和管理人员来说，了解员工满意度和技术接受度至关重要。
Zotero 插件