• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线姑息化疗治疗食管癌和胃癌:一般人群中的实践模式和结局。

First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in the General Population.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1537-e1550. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00397. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1200/OP.20.00397
PMID:33449833
Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical trials have shown that palliative chemotherapy (PC) improves survival in patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer; however, outcomes achieved in routine practice are unknown. We describe treatment patterns and outcomes among patients treated in the general population of Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

The Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify patients with esophageal or gastric cancer from 2007 to 2016, and data were linked to other health administrative databases. Patients who received curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy were excluded. Factors associated with the receipt of PC were determined using logistic regression. First-line PC regimens were categorized, and trends over time were reported. Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The cohort included 9,848 patients; 22% (2,207 of 9,848) received PC. Patients receiving PC were younger (mean age, 63 74 years; < .0001) and more likely male (71% 65%; < .0001). Thirty-seven percent of non-PC patients saw a medical oncologist in consultation. Over the study period, utilization of PC increased (from 11% in 2007 to 19% in 2016; < .0001), whereas the proportion of patients receiving triplet regimens decreased (65% in 2007 to 56% in 2016; = .04). In the PC group, the median overall and cancer-specific survival from treatment initiation was 7.2 months.

CONCLUSION

One fifth of patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer in the general population receive PC. Median survival of patients treated in routine practice is inferior to that in clinical trials. Only one third of patients not treated with PC had consultation with a medical oncologist. Further work is necessary to understand low utilization of PC and medical oncology consultation in this patient population.

摘要

目的

临床试验表明姑息化疗(PC)可提高无法治愈的食管和胃癌患者的生存率;然而,常规实践中的结果尚不清楚。我们描述了在加拿大安大略省普通人群中接受治疗的患者的治疗模式和结果。

方法

利用安大略癌症登记处从 2007 年至 2016 年确定患有食管或胃癌的患者,并将数据与其他健康管理数据库相链接。排除接受根治性手术或放疗的患者。使用逻辑回归确定接受 PC 的相关因素。对一线 PC 方案进行分类,并报告随时间的变化趋势。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法确定生存率。

结果

该队列包括 9848 例患者;22%(2207/9848)接受了 PC。接受 PC 的患者年龄较小(平均年龄 63 74 岁;<0.0001)且更可能为男性(71%65%;<0.0001)。37%的非 PC 患者接受了医学肿瘤学家的咨询。在研究期间,PC 的使用率增加(从 2007 年的 11%增加到 2016 年的 19%;<0.0001),而接受三联方案的患者比例下降(2007 年的 65%下降到 2016 年的 56%;=0.04)。在 PC 组中,从治疗开始到整体和癌症特异性生存的中位数为 7.2 个月。

结论

在普通人群中,20%的无法治愈的食管和胃癌患者接受 PC 治疗。常规实践中治疗患者的中位生存时间劣于临床试验中的生存时间。未接受 PC 治疗的患者中,只有三分之一接受了医学肿瘤学家的咨询。需要进一步努力了解该患者群体中 PC 和医学肿瘤学咨询的低利用率。

相似文献

1
First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in the General Population.一线姑息化疗治疗食管癌和胃癌:一般人群中的实践模式和结局。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1537-e1550. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00397. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Symptom Evolution in Patients with Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Study.接受姑息化疗的食管癌和胃癌患者的症状演变:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09289-6. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Palliative Radiotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Population-Based Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省食管癌和胃癌姑息性放疗:基于人群的应用模式和结局。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):157-166. doi: 10.1177/08258597211072946. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
Survival of esophageal and gastric cancer patients with adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy-a retrospective analysis of a register-based patient cohort.辅助化疗和姑息化疗的食管和胃癌患者生存情况-基于登记患者队列的回顾性分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;76(7):1029-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02883-3. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Outcomes of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel Among Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Gastric/Lower Esophageal Cancer: A Real-world Study.雷莫芦单抗联合紫杉醇治疗既往治疗转移性胃/下食管腺癌患者的结局:一项真实世界研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;44(4):158-161. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000799.
6
Variation in receipt of therapy and survival with provider volume for medical oncology in non-curative esophago-gastric cancer: a population-based analysis.非治愈性食管胃交界部癌症中医疗肿瘤学治疗接受情况和生存与提供者数量的变化:基于人群的分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Mar;23(2):300-309. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01012-z. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Geographic impact on access to care and survival for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study.非根治性食管胃交界癌获得治疗和生存的地理影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jul;24(4):790-799. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01157-w. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
Heterogeneity of first-line palliative systemic treatment in synchronous metastatic esophagogastric cancer patients: A real-world evidence study.同步转移性胃食管交界癌患者一线姑息性全身治疗的异质性:一项真实世界证据研究。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;146(7):1889-1901. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32580. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
Real-World Outcomes and Factors Associated With the Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.真实世界结局和相关因素与胃、胃食管结合部或食管腺癌二线治疗的患者。
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819847642. doi: 10.1177/1073274819847642.
10
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省区域性照护体系中食管癌的诊断、治疗和结局的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090.

引用本文的文献

1
A Canadian algorithm for upper gastrointestinal cancer management.一种用于上消化道癌症管理的加拿大算法。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 14;15:1548637. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1548637. eCollection 2025.
2
An Evaluation of an Algorithm for the Selection of Flexible Survival Models for Cancer Immunotherapies: Pass or Fail?一种用于选择癌症免疫疗法中灵活生存模型的算法评估:通过还是失败?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Dec;42(12):1395-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01429-0. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Does Geography Play a Role in the Receipt of End-of-Life Care for Advanced Cancer Patients? Evidence from an Australian Local Health District Population-Based Study.
地理因素是否会影响晚期癌症患者接受临终关怀的情况?来自澳大利亚地方卫生区基于人群的研究证据。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;26(11):1453-1465. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0555. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Comparing treatment and outcomes in advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas: a population-based study.晚期食管癌、胃食管交界癌和胃腺癌的治疗与结局比较:一项基于人群的研究。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Mar 21;15:17588359231162576. doi: 10.1177/17588359231162576. eCollection 2023.
5
Utilization and Outcomes of Radiation in Stage IV Esophageal Cancer.IV期食管癌放疗的应用与疗效
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Nov 6;3(12):100429. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100429. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Use of Palliative Interventions at End of Life for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer.晚期胃肠道癌终末期姑息干预的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7281-7292. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12342-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) in unselected patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer: does age really matter?氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和多西他赛(FLOT)方案在未经筛选的晚期胃癌和胃食管癌患者中的疗效及耐受性:年龄真的有影响吗?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 May;149(5):1849-1862. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04109-8. Epub 2022 Jun 28.