Baloh R W, Yee R D, Honrubia V, Jacobson K
Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine 90024.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Feb;59(2):121-4.
We compared horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit recorded with a scleral contact lens technique at multiple sinusoidal frequencies (0.2-1.6 Hz) and peak velocities (12.5-100 degrees.s-1) in 10 normal subjects. The gain was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) and the harmonic distortion significantly lower (p less than 0.05) for horizontal pursuit compared to vertical pursuit for all stimuli except the lowest frequency and peak velocity. Both horizontal and vertical pursuit exhibited a phase lag that was minimal at lower frequencies but reached a mean of about 37 degrees at 1.6 Hz. This difference between horizontal and vertical pursuit could be explained by current models of the smooth pursuit system if one postulates a lower saturation level of retinal error velocity for vertical pursuit compared to horizontal pursuit.
我们使用巩膜接触镜技术,在10名正常受试者中,于多个正弦频率(0.2 - 1.6赫兹)和峰值速度(12.5 - 100度·秒⁻¹)下比较了水平和垂直平滑追踪。除最低频率和峰值速度的所有刺激外,水平追踪的增益显著更高(p < 0.05),谐波失真显著更低(p < 0.05)。水平和垂直追踪均表现出相位滞后,在较低频率时最小,但在1.6赫兹时平均达到约37度。如果假设垂直追踪的视网膜误差速度饱和水平低于水平追踪,那么当前的平滑追踪系统模型可以解释水平和垂直追踪之间的这种差异。