Suppr超能文献

SECUre:英国急诊科紧急护理安全性的多中心调查。

SECUre: a multicentre survey of the safety of emergency care in UK emergency departments.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, Surrey, UK

Emergency Department, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Oct;38(10):769-775. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208965. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

According to safety theory, frontline staff are often best informed to identify problems that threaten safety in their workplace. Surveying emergency department (ED) staff is a straightforward method for investigating risks, identifying solutions and evaluating interventions. This study's aim was to validate an ED safety questionnaire specifically for use in the UK and provide an overview of safety culture and risks.

METHODS

An ED safety questionnaire developed in the USA was modified then validated using 33 RCEM (Royal College of Emergency Medicine) patient safety leads (calculating content validity index). The resulting 39 multiple-choice questionnaire was used in a multicentre survey. 110 participants were randomly selected from each site. A minimum 40% response rate per site reduced non-response bias. Cronbach's alpha was calculated across five categories as an estimate of reliability. Simple descriptive statistics were used to identify risks or good practice. χ test compared individual sites' results with national results to highlight outlier questions (ie, the department's strengths and weaknesses). χ was also used to identify significant differences between responses from nurses and doctors.

RESULTS

1060 participants were recruited across 18 sites. Cronbach's alpha was adequate (0.65 to 0.8). Analysis highlighted risks posed by interruptions, negative effects of targets, deficient mental healthcare (especially compared with critical care) and ED crowding. The study also revealed encouraging safety culture, such as effective doctor-nurse communication, and identified sites that were positive outliers overall or for specific questions. Comparing doctors and nurses' responses suggests additional support is needed for nursing staff.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first step towards assessing ED safety culture and describing risks in the UK. Identifying outlier sites provides opportunities to learn from excellence. Repeat application of the survey will enable monitoring of safety interventions on a local and national level.

摘要

简介

根据安全理论,一线员工通常最了解其工作场所内威胁安全的问题。调查急诊部(ED)员工是调查风险、确定解决方案和评估干预措施的一种直接方法。本研究旨在验证专门用于英国的 ED 安全问卷,并提供安全文化和风险的概述。

方法

对美国开发的 ED 安全问卷进行修改,然后使用 33 名皇家急诊医学院(RCEM)患者安全负责人进行验证(计算内容有效性指数)。由此产生的 39 个多项选择问卷在多中心调查中使用。从每个站点随机选择 110 名参与者。每个站点的最低 40%的响应率可降低无响应偏差。使用五个类别计算克朗巴赫α值,作为可靠性的估计值。使用简单的描述性统计数据来识别风险或良好实践。χ检验比较各站点的结果与全国结果,以突出异常问题(即该部门的优势和劣势)。χ 还用于识别护士和医生的回答之间的显著差异。

结果

在 18 个站点共招募了 1060 名参与者。克朗巴赫α值足够(0.65 至 0.8)。分析突出了中断、目标的负面影响、精神保健不足(尤其是与重症监护相比)和 ED 拥挤带来的风险。该研究还揭示了令人鼓舞的安全文化,例如有效的医生-护士沟通,并确定了总体上或特定问题上是积极异常的站点。比较医生和护士的回答表明,护理人员需要额外的支持。

结论

本研究朝着评估英国 ED 安全文化和描述风险迈出了第一步。确定异常站点为从卓越中学习提供了机会。重复应用调查将使我们能够在本地和全国范围内监测安全干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验