Ricklin Meret E, Hess Felice, Hautz Wolf E
Inselspital Bern, Universitäres Notfallzentrum, Bern, Switzerland.
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Mar 15;36(2):Doc14. doi: 10.3205/zma001222. eCollection 2019.
Poor safety culture, bad teamwork, non-functional inter-departmental working relationships and increased cognitive demands are associated with higher amounts of adverse events in hospitals. To improve patient safety, one of the first steps is to assess safety culture among health care providers in an institution. Considering the sparsity of studies addressing patient safety culture in Europe and Switzerland, the aim of the present study was to assess patient safety culture in the emergency department of a University Hospital in Switzerland. We employed the Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture, developed by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 140 questionnaires were distributed to nurses and physicians. Two weeks after the first questionnaire, we performed a sensitization campaign addressed to health care providers, and then repeated the survey. We calculated composite scores for each question category and percentages of positive responses for each dimension. For group comparisons such as possible differences relating to education and duration of employment and to compare results of the first and second survey we used T-tests. The results were compared to other published surveys outside of Switzerland. Particularly positive assessments were found for the categories "nonpunitive response to errors", "teamwork within units", "supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety" and, compared to other hospitals, also "staffing". The lowest average percent positive responses were found in the categories "frequencies of reported event", "teamwork across units" and "handoffs and transitions". Nurses and health care personnel with a longer employment history had an overall more negative assessment of patient safety culture, when compared to physicians and personnel with a shorter duration of employment, respectively. The present study has identified strengths and potential weaknesses in the safety culture of a large university hospital emergency department in Switzerland. The results provide opportunities for improvement of patient safety in particular in the reporting of adverse events, in interaction across units and patient transitions. Furthermore, as we employed a standardized self-assessment tool similar to previously published studies, the work contributes to the establishment of a benchmark for hospital safety culture at the national, European and international level.
不良的安全文化、糟糕的团队协作、部门间工作关系失效以及认知需求增加,都与医院中更高的不良事件发生率相关。为提高患者安全,首要步骤之一是评估医疗机构中医疗服务提供者的安全文化。鉴于欧洲和瑞士针对患者安全文化的研究较少,本研究旨在评估瑞士一家大学医院急诊科的患者安全文化。我们采用了美国医疗保健研究与质量局开发的《患者安全文化医院调查》。向护士和医生发放了140份问卷。在首次问卷调查两周后,我们针对医疗服务提供者开展了一次宣传活动,然后再次进行调查。我们计算了每个问题类别的综合得分以及每个维度的肯定回答百分比。对于诸如与教育程度和工作时长可能存在的差异等组间比较,以及比较首次和第二次调查的结果,我们使用了t检验。将结果与瑞士以外其他已发表的调查进行了比较。在“对错误的无惩罚性回应”“科室内部团队协作”“主管/经理对促进患者安全的期望与行动”类别中,以及与其他医院相比,在“人员配备”方面,都得到了特别积极的评估。肯定回答平均百分比最低的类别是“报告事件的频率”“跨科室团队协作”和“交接班与转接”。与工作时长较短的医生和人员相比,工作年限较长的护士和医护人员对患者安全文化的总体评估更负面。本研究确定了瑞士一家大型大学医院急诊科安全文化的优势和潜在弱点。研究结果为改善患者安全提供了机会,特别是在不良事件报告、跨科室互动和患者转接方面。此外,由于我们使用了与先前发表的研究类似的标准化自我评估工具,这项工作有助于在国家、欧洲和国际层面建立医院安全文化的基准。