From the School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (CMR, HPR).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):151-161. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200187.
Interdisciplinary primary care team expertise can aid patient self management of type 2 diabetes, but small community health centers (CHCs) may not have the volume to consistently provide interprofessional care. We examine whether care team role expertise is associated with patients' experiences of chronic care and whether the relationship is stronger for small CHC sites.
Surveys of 1277 adults with diabetes (2012; response rate = 47%) that assessed nonphysician team roles involved in managing their chronic care, including community health workers, diabetes educators, nutritionists, pharmacists, mental health providers, and other general staff, were integrated with clinical and administrative data from 14 CHCs. Random effects regression models estimated the association of team expertise, CHC size, and 1) patients' experiences of chronic care; and 2) hemoglobin A1c control, controlling for patient comorbidities, sex, race/ethnicity/primary language, age, and insurance coverage.
Care teams with community health workers ( β = 7.67, < .01), diabetes educators ( β = 6.05, < .01), nutritionists ( β = 5.21, < .01), and other general staff ([Formula: see text] =4.96, = .02) were associated with better patients' experiences of chronic care, but not hemoglobin A1c control. Patients of small CHC sites reported better experiences of care ( β = 2.15, = .03) with each additional team role reported, but the relationship was not significant for large CHCs.
Patients with access to care team expertise in self-management support, including diabetes educators, nutritionists, community health workers, and other general staff report better experiences of chronic care. These team roles may reduce barriers to patient self management and improve patients' overall experiences of chronic care, particularly in small CHC sites.
跨学科的初级保健团队专业知识可以帮助 2 型糖尿病患者进行自我管理,但小型社区卫生中心(CHC)可能没有足够的患者量来持续提供跨专业护理。我们研究了护理团队角色专业知识是否与患者的慢性病护理体验相关,以及这种关系在小型 CHC 站点是否更强。
对 1277 名患有糖尿病的成年人(2012 年;回应率=47%)进行了调查,评估了参与管理其慢性病的非医师团队角色,包括社区卫生工作者、糖尿病教育者、营养师、药剂师、心理健康提供者和其他普通工作人员,同时整合了来自 14 个 CHC 的临床和行政数据。随机效应回归模型估计了团队专业知识、CHC 规模以及 1)患者的慢性病护理体验;以及 2)血红蛋白 A1c 控制与患者合并症、性别、种族/民族/主要语言、年龄和保险覆盖范围的关联。
配备社区卫生工作者(β=7.67,<0.01)、糖尿病教育者(β=6.05,<0.01)、营养师(β=5.21,<0.01)和其他普通工作人员([公式:见文本]β=4.96,=0.02)的护理团队与更好的慢性病护理体验相关,但与血红蛋白 A1c 控制无关。小型 CHC 站点的患者报告说,随着报告的团队角色数量的增加,他们的护理体验更好(β=2.15,=0.03),但对于大型 CHC 而言,这种关系并不显著。
能够获得自我管理支持的护理团队专业知识的患者,包括糖尿病教育者、营养师、社区卫生工作者和其他普通工作人员,报告说他们的慢性病护理体验更好。这些团队角色可能会减少患者自我管理的障碍,并改善患者慢性病护理的整体体验,尤其是在小型 CHC 站点。