Hansen-Nord M, Gahrn-Hansen B, Siboni K
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
APMIS. 1988 Feb;96(2):133-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb05280.x.
The in vitro susceptibility to cephalothin and cefuroxime of 195 isolates of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci was determined by the agar-diffusion test, using 7.5% NaCl-supplemented agar. The distribution of the inhibition zone diameters for isolates of S. epidermidis (S. biotype 1) as well as for S. haemolyticus (S. biotype 4) was trimodal. While 4% of the isolates were found susceptible to cefuroxime, 39% of the S. epidermidis/S. hominis (S. biotype 1) isolates and 34% of the S. haemolyticus (S. biotype 4) isolates were found susceptible to cephalothin by this method. Eight of these isolates (six S. epidermidis, two S. haemolyticus) were selected for susceptibility testing by the tube-dilution method, together with four isolates (three S. haemolyticus, one S. epidermidis) found resistant to cephalothin by the agar-diffusion test. The first-mentioned isolates were all found susceptible to cephalothin with MICs less than or equal to 2 micrograms/l, while the last-named all were resistant with MICs greater than or equal to 16 micrograms/ml. Population analyses revealed sub-populations of highly resistant bacteria in all methicillin-resistant isolates of S. epidermidis (S. biotype 1), as well as in all isolates of S. haemolyticus (S. biotype 4). We thus concluded that methicillin-resistance in isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci implies resistance to cephalosporins and that the difference between S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus as regards cephalosporin-susceptibility is quantitative and not qualitative. Eighty-nine per cent of the 195 methicillin-resistant isolates in this study were resistant to penicillin and at least one more antibiotic. We therefore think that resistance to penicillin and one or more non-beta-lactam antibiotics strongly suggests methicillin-resistance and that such isolates should be further tested on hypertonic media.
采用含7.5%氯化钠的琼脂,通过琼脂扩散试验测定了195株耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对头孢噻吩和头孢呋辛的体外敏感性。表皮葡萄球菌(生物型1)以及溶血葡萄球菌(生物型4)分离株抑菌圈直径的分布呈三峰型。通过该方法,发现4%的分离株对头孢呋辛敏感,39%的表皮葡萄球菌/人葡萄球菌(生物型1)分离株和34%的溶血葡萄球菌(生物型4)分离株对头孢噻吩敏感。从这些分离株中选取8株(6株表皮葡萄球菌,2株溶血葡萄球菌)采用试管稀释法进行药敏试验,同时选取4株在琼脂扩散试验中对头孢噻吩耐药的分离株(3株溶血葡萄球菌,1株表皮葡萄球菌)。结果发现,上述首先提到的分离株对头孢噻吩均敏感,其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)小于或等于2微克/毫升,而最后提到的分离株均耐药,MIC大于或等于16微克/毫升。群体分析显示,在所有耐甲氧西林的表皮葡萄球菌(生物型1)分离株以及所有溶血葡萄球菌(生物型4)分离株中均存在高耐药细菌亚群。因此,我们得出结论,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌分离株中的耐甲氧西林意味着对头孢菌素耐药,并且表皮葡萄球菌和溶血葡萄球菌在头孢菌素敏感性方面的差异是定量的而非定性的。本研究中195株耐甲氧西林分离株中有89%对青霉素和至少一种其他抗生素耐药。因此,我们认为对青霉素和一种或多种非β-内酰胺类抗生素耐药强烈提示耐甲氧西林,此类分离株应在高渗培养基上进一步检测。