• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可切除的淋巴结阴性胰腺癌的临床意义。

Clinical Implication of Node-negative Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):2257-2264. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09543-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-09543-x
PMID:33452602
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is one of the strongest prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer. However, the clinical implication of pathologically node-negative pancreatic cancer (pN0-PC) has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for radiologically resectable pancreatic cancer between 2002 and 2018 were included in this study. A clinicopathological examination focusing on pN0-PC was performed.

RESULTS

Of all 533 patients, 155 (29.1%) were diagnosed with pN0-PC and 378 (70.9%) were diagnosed with node-positive pancreatic cancer (pN1/2-PC). The 5-year survival rates of patients with pN0-PC and pN1/2-PC were 57.1% and 25.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed six prognostic factors in pN0-PC: age ≥ 70 years, nonadministration of adjuvant chemotherapy, anterior serosal invasion, nerve plexus invasion, and microscopic lymphatic and venous invasions. The 5-year survival rates of patients who had pN0-PC with 0-1 risk factor, with 2-3 risk factors, and with 4-6 risk factors were 87.6%, 47.9%, and 16.4%, respectively. Survival of patients who had pN0-PC with 4-6 risk factors was comparable to that of pN1/2 patients. The diagnostic capability of metastasis-negative lymph node was unsatisfactory, with a predictive value of < 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the prognosis of patients with pN0-PC was better than that of patients with pN1/2-PC, it is not satisfactory. Survival of patients who had pN0-PC with 0-1 risk factors was extremely favorable; however, survival of patients who had pN0-PC with 4-6 risk factors was similar to those with pN1/2-PC.

摘要

背景

淋巴结转移是胰腺癌最强的预后因素之一。然而,病理上淋巴结阴性的胰腺癌(pN0-PC)的临床意义尚未得到充分研究。

方法

本研究纳入了 2002 年至 2018 年间接受放射学可切除胰腺癌手术的患者。对这些患者进行了以 pN0-PC 为重点的临床病理检查。

结果

在所有 533 名患者中,155 名(29.1%)被诊断为 pN0-PC,378 名(70.9%)被诊断为淋巴结阳性胰腺癌(pN1/2-PC)。pN0-PC 和 pN1/2-PC 患者的 5 年生存率分别为 57.1%和 25.0%(p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,pN0-PC 有 6 个预后因素:年龄≥70 岁、未行辅助化疗、前膜侵犯、神经丛侵犯以及镜下淋巴管和静脉侵犯。pN0-PC 患者具有 0-1 个危险因素、2-3 个危险因素和 4-6 个危险因素的 5 年生存率分别为 87.6%、47.9%和 16.4%。具有 4-6 个危险因素的 pN0-PC 患者的生存情况与 pN1/2 患者相当。阴性淋巴结转移的诊断能力不理想,预测值<43%。

结论

尽管 pN0-PC 患者的预后优于 pN1/2-PC 患者,但并不理想。具有 0-1 个危险因素的 pN0-PC 患者的生存情况极好;然而,具有 4-6 个危险因素的 pN0-PC 患者的生存情况与 pN1/2-PC 患者相似。

相似文献

1
Clinical Implication of Node-negative Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.可切除的淋巴结阴性胰腺癌的临床意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):2257-2264. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09543-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Timing But Not Patterns of Recurrence Is Different Between Node-negative and Node-positive Resected Pancreatic Cancer.淋巴结阴性和阳性可切除胰腺癌的复发时间而非模式不同。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):357-365. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003123.
3
[Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].[淋巴结阴性转移性胃癌的预后因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):190-194.
4
Effect of the number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on prognosis of patients after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.阳性淋巴结数量及淋巴结比率对胰腺腺癌切除术后患者预后的影响。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Dec;13(6):634-41. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60264-2.
5
[Significance of occult lymphatic tumor spread in pancreatic cancer].[隐匿性淋巴转移在胰腺癌中的意义]
Chirurg. 2005 Nov;76(11):1064-72. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1041-y.
6
Prognostic implication of metastasis limited to segmental (level 13) and/or subsegmental (level 14) lymph nodes in patients with surgically resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and pathologic N1 lymph node status.手术切除的非小细胞肺癌患者中,病理性 N1 淋巴结状态下,转移仅限于节段性(水平 13)和/或亚节段性(水平 14)淋巴结的预后意义。
Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4512-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27424. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
7
Mediastinal downstaging after induction treatment is not a significant prognostic factor to select patients who would benefit from surgery: the clinical value of the lymph node ratio.诱导治疗后纵隔降期并非选择能从手术中获益患者的重要预后因素:淋巴结比率的临床价值
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Feb;20(2):222-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu378. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
The Prognosis Value of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion in pN0 Gastric Cancer Patients with Insufficient Examined Lymph Nodes.淋巴结检出数目不足的 pN0 期胃癌患者中淋巴管浸润的预后价值
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04101-z. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
Prognosis for gastric carcinomas with an insufficient number of examined negative lymph nodes.胃腺癌中检查到的阴性淋巴结数量不足的预后。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;40(3):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
10
The Outcome for Patients With Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Case-Matched Analysis of pN1 and pN0 Patients.接受调强放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗的病理淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者的预后:pN1和pN0患者的病例匹配分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating a computed tomography radiomics strategy to predict lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.开发并验证一种用于预测胰腺癌淋巴结转移的计算机断层扫描放射组学策略。
World J Radiol. 2025 Aug 28;17(8):109373. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.109373.
2
Hydroxychloroquine reduces metastatic tumor burden in pancreatic adenocarcinoma through myeloperoxidase inhibition.羟氯喹通过抑制髓过氧化物酶减轻胰腺腺癌的转移瘤负担。
J Inflamm (Lond). 2025 Aug 12;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12950-025-00456-8.
3
Diagnostic Value of Serum D-dimer, CA19-9, and CT Imaging Features in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Benign Pancreatic Lesions.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical impact of the lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.淋巴结比率作为胰腺癌切除术后预后因素的临床影响。
Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2389-94.
血清D-二聚体、CA19-9及CT影像特征在胰腺导管腺癌和胰腺良性病变中的诊断价值
J Cancer. 2025 Jun 12;16(9):2812-2821. doi: 10.7150/jca.111548. eCollection 2025.
4
A radiomics-based model for predicting lymph nodes metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.一种基于影像组学的预测胰腺导管腺癌淋巴结转移的模型:一项多中心研究。
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 27;16(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02025-2.
5
Novel machine-learning model for predicting lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.用于预测可切除性胰腺导管腺癌淋巴结转移的新型机器学习模型
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jun 17;9(1):161-168. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12836. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
HOXA11-As Promotes Lymph Node Metastasis Through Regulation of IFNL and HMGB Family Genes in Pancreatic Cancer.HOXA11反义RNA通过调控胰腺癌中IFNL和HMGB家族基因促进淋巴结转移。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 30;25(23):12920. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312920.
7
Correlation Between Antihypertensive Drugs and Survival Among Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.降压药物与胰腺导管腺癌患者生存率之间的相关性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;16(23):3945. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233945.
8
Comparison of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新辅助治疗与手术优先治疗可切除或交界可切除胰腺癌的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0295983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295983. eCollection 2024.
9
Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer-Comparison of Global Guidelines over the Last 5 Years.转移性胰腺癌的管理——过去5年全球指南比较
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;15(17):4400. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174400.
10
Predictive role of radiomics features extracted from preoperative cross-sectional imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in detecting lymph node metastasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.基于术前胰腺导管腺癌横断面影像学提取的影像组学特征预测淋巴结转移的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Aug;48(8):2570-2584. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03940-y. Epub 2023 May 18.