Suppr超能文献

锯叶棕提取物治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

The efficacy and safety of Serenoa repens extract for the treatment of patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, The Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China.

Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3489-3495. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03577-2. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Serenoa repens extract (SRE) for the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, clinical phase 4 study of 221 patients with CP/CPPS across 11 centers. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive SRE or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in total score on the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Secondary efficacy endpoints included improvements within each domain of NIH-CPSI, clinical response rate, and International Index of Erectile Function 5 items (IIEF-5).

RESULTS

In total, 226 patients were enrolled and randomized between January 2017 and June 2018. Of these 221 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis: 148 in the SRE group and 73 patients in the placebo group. Compared to the placebo, SRE led to statistically significant improvements in the NIH-CPSI total score and sub-scores. The significant improvements of NIH-CPSI scores were established after 2 weeks from the first dose, and continued to the end of the treatment. Furthermore, a significantly higher rate of patients achieved a clinical response in the SRE group compared with that in the placebo group (73.0% vs 32.9%, P < 0.0001). Only minor adverse events were observed across the entire study population.

CONCLUSIONS

SRE was effective, safe, and clinically superior to placebo for the treatment of CP/CPPS. ChiCTR-IPR-16010196, December 21, 2016 retrospectively registered.

摘要

目的

进行一项安慰剂对照试验,以评估锯叶棕提取物(SRE)治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在 11 个中心进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、多中心的 4 期临床研究,共有 221 例 CP/CPPS 患者参与。参与者以 2:1 的比例随机分配接受 SRE 或安慰剂治疗 12 周。主要疗效终点是 NIH-CPSI 总评分的变化。次要疗效终点包括 NIH-CPSI 各域的改善、临床反应率和国际勃起功能指数 5 项(IIEF-5)。

结果

共有 226 例患者于 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间入组并随机分组。其中 221 例患者纳入意向治疗分析:SRE 组 148 例,安慰剂组 73 例。与安慰剂相比,SRE 可显著改善 NIH-CPSI 总分和子评分。NIH-CPSI 评分的显著改善在首次服药后 2 周内即可观察到,并持续至治疗结束。此外,SRE 组的临床反应率明显高于安慰剂组(73.0% vs 32.9%,P<0.0001)。整个研究人群中仅观察到轻微的不良事件。

结论

SRE 治疗 CP/CPPS 的疗效优于安慰剂,且安全可靠。ChiCTR-IPR-16010196,2016 年 12 月 21 日回顾性注册。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验