• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

eccSOFA:适应于预测急诊危重症患者住院病死率的 SOFA 疾病严重程度评分。

eccSOFA: SOFA illness severity score adapted to predict in-hospital mortality in emergency critical care patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Emergency Department, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.018. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.018
PMID:33453549
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Boarding of ICU patients in the ED is increasing. Illness severity scores may help emergency physicians stratify risk to guide earlier transfer to the ICU and assess pre-ICU interventions by adjusting for baseline mortality risk. Most existing illness severity scores are based on data that is not available at the time of the hospital admission decision or cannot be extracted from the electronic health record (EHR). We adapted the SOFA score to create a new illness severity score (eccSOFA) that can be calculated at the time of ICU admission order entry in the ED using EHR data. We evaluated this score in a cohort of emergency critical care (ECC) patients at a single academic center over a period of 3 years.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using EHR data to assess predictive accuracy of eccSOFA for estimating in-hospital mortality risk. The patient population included all adult patients who had a critical care admission order entered while in the ED of an academic medical center between 10/24/2013 and 9/30/2016. eccSOFA's discriminatory ability for in-hospital mortality was assessed using ROC curves.

RESULTS

Of the 3912 patients whose in-hospital mortality risk was estimated, 2260 (57.8%) were in the low-risk group (scores 0-3), 1203 (30.8%) in the intermediate-risk group (scores 4-7), and 449 (11.5%) in the high-risk group (scores 8+). In-hospital mortality for the low-, intermediate, and high-risk groups was 4.2% (95%CI: 3.4-5.1), 15.5% (95% CI 13.5-17.6), and 37.9% (95% CI 33.4-42.3) respectively. The AUROC was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.75-0.80) for the integer score and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.77) for the categorical eccSOFA.

CONCLUSIONS

As a predictor of in-hospital mortality, eccSOFA can be calculated based on variables that are commonly available at the time of critical care admission order entry in the ED and has discriminatory ability that is comparable to other commonly used illness severity scores. Future studies should assess the calibration of our absolute risk predictions.

摘要

背景

在急诊室(ED)中收治 ICU 患者的情况正在增加。疾病严重程度评分可能有助于急诊医师对风险进行分层,以指导更早地将患者转移到 ICU,并通过调整基线死亡率风险来评估 ICU 前干预措施。大多数现有的疾病严重程度评分是基于在医院入院决策时不可用或无法从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取的数据。我们改编了 SOFA 评分,创建了一个新的疾病严重程度评分(eccSOFA),可以在 ED 中下达 ICU 入院医嘱时使用 EHR 数据进行计算。我们在一个为期 3 年的单所学术中心的急诊危重病(ECC)患者队列中评估了该评分。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用 EHR 数据评估 eccSOFA 对估计院内死亡率风险的预测准确性。患者人群包括 2013 年 10 月 24 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日期间在学术医疗中心的 ED 中下达重症监护入院医嘱的所有成年患者。使用 ROC 曲线评估 eccSOFA 对院内死亡率的区分能力。

结果

在所估计的 3912 例患者的院内死亡率中,2260 例(57.8%)为低危组(评分 0-3),1203 例(30.8%)为中危组(评分 4-7),449 例(11.5%)为高危组(评分 8+)。低、中、高危组的院内死亡率分别为 4.2%(95%CI:3.4-5.1)、15.5%(95%CI 13.5-17.6)和 37.9%(95%CI 33.4-42.3)。整数评分的 AUC 为 0.78(95%CI:0.75-0.80),分类 eccSOFA 的 AUC 为 0.75(95%CI:0.72-0.77)。

结论

作为院内死亡率的预测指标,eccSOFA 可以根据在 ED 下达重症监护入院医嘱时通常可用的变量进行计算,其区分能力与其他常用的疾病严重程度评分相当。未来的研究应评估我们的绝对风险预测的校准情况。

相似文献

1
eccSOFA: SOFA illness severity score adapted to predict in-hospital mortality in emergency critical care patients.eccSOFA:适应于预测急诊危重症患者住院病死率的 SOFA 疾病严重程度评分。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.018. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Effect of emergency critical care nurses and emergency department boarding time on in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients.急危重症护士和急诊留观时间对危重症患者院内死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:120-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.067. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
Association of an Emergency Critical Care Program With Survival and Early Downgrade Among Critically Ill Medical Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊危重症监护计划对急诊危重症内科患者生存和早期降级的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun 1;51(6):731-741. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005835. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
4
Utility of SOFA and Δ-SOFA scores for predicting outcome in critically ill patients from the emergency department.SOFA 和 Δ-SOFA 评分对急诊危重症患者预后预测的价值。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):387-393. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000472.
5
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
6
Selection bias in estimating the relationship between prolonged ED boarding and mortality in emergency critical care patients.评估急诊重症患者长时间急诊留观与死亡率之间关系时的选择偏倚。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):e12667. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12667. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
8
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
9
SOFA Score prognostic performance among patients admitted to High-Dependency Units.SOFA 评分在入住重症加强护理病房患者中的预后预测能力。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Oct;85(10):1080-1088. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13543-2. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Predictors of Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存预测因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0328. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
miR-182-Mediated Dysregulation of Histidine Metabolism Compromises T Cell Immunity in Sepsis.miR-182介导的组氨酸代谢失调损害脓毒症中的T细胞免疫。
Inflammation. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10753-025-02333-1.
2
External validation of the 4C Mortality Score for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the RECOVER network.RECOVER 网络中 COVID-19 住院患者 4C 死亡率评分的外部验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e054700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054700.
3
The Survival of Septic Patients with Compensated Liver Cirrhosis Is Not Inferior to That of Septic Patients without Liver Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
代偿期肝硬化脓毒症患者的生存率不低于无肝硬化脓毒症患者:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):1629. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061629.
4
Selection bias in estimating the relationship between prolonged ED boarding and mortality in emergency critical care patients.评估急诊重症患者长时间急诊留观与死亡率之间关系时的选择偏倚。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):e12667. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12667. eCollection 2022 Feb.