Environment and Health, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Ansell (U.K.) Limited, Willerby, Hull, United Kingdom.
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 5;411:125045. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125045. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Previously, we have demonstrated the capability of activated charcoal cloth (ACC) to assess dermal exposure to VOCs. Here we investigated whether ACC patches can be used as an under-glove indicator to evaluate the ingress of toluene through disposable gloves in a controlled environment, and compared these results to the amount of toluene ingress determined from the standardized test methods for determining chemical permeation through PPE. In a test chamber, with plugs for air sampling, five to six ACC patches were placed on a mannequin hand underneath disposable gloves (latex, nitrile, neoprene, polymer laminate). Three work-exposure scenarios were simulated to assess toluene ingress through the different gloves: vapor exposure; spray exposure, and immersion. The standard permeation test, using a diffusion cell, was carried with glove material of the palm, with continuous contact conditions. In all of ACC test, the order of toluene ingress was latex > neoprene > nitrile > Barrier, but for the standardized testing, the order of the neoprene and nitrile was reversed, and nitrile had higher levels of toluene ingress. These results show the need to think beyond standard testing techniques for occupational exposure to hazardous substances, and the added value of "application style" testing.
此前,我们已经证明了活性炭布(ACC)在评估 VOC 经皮暴露方面的能力。在这里,我们研究了 ACC 补丁是否可以用作手套下指示剂,以评估甲苯通过一次性手套在受控环境中的渗透情况,并将这些结果与通过 PPE 测定化学渗透的标准化测试方法确定的甲苯渗透量进行比较。在一个带有空气采样插头的测试室中,将五到六个 ACC 补丁放置在一次性手套(乳胶、丁腈、氯丁橡胶、聚合物层压材料)下的人体模型手上。模拟了三种工作暴露情况,以评估不同手套中甲苯的渗透情况:蒸气暴露;喷雾暴露和浸渍。使用扩散池进行了标准渗透测试,手套材料为手掌,接触条件连续。在所有的 ACC 测试中,甲苯渗透的顺序是乳胶>氯丁橡胶>丁腈>屏障,但对于标准化测试,氯丁橡胶和丁腈的顺序颠倒了,丁腈的甲苯渗透水平更高。这些结果表明,需要超越针对危险物质职业暴露的标准测试技术进行思考,并考虑“应用方式”测试的附加值。