Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Australia.
Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103042. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103042. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Australia's recent investment in, and optimism about, direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C brings with it the promise of new drug futures, including the possibility of a post-hepatitis C world and a revolution in the lives of people affected by the disease. But is the situation more complicated than we might assume? What expectations are being produced about post-cure lives? And what is being overlooked along the way? We argue that hepatitis C policy, practice and research can instantiate a problematic orientation towards medicine and 'the future' and explore ways of moving beyond these orientations. The essay then proceeds into two main stages. First, combining critiques from existing research with preliminary insights from a new study on hepatitis C 'post-cure' lives, we outline some of the key logics regarding cure and post-cure, and explain why such logics are problematic. We argue against the assumption that the availability of a medical cure will alone reverse the entrenched social, political and structural dynamics that drive infections and limit service access. To do so, we note, is to overlook the net of meanings and power relations that co-constitute hepatitis C and injecting drug use and render those associated with them marginalised and disenfranchised. Such optimism erases the legacy of laws and policies devised in a pre-cure world, and their role in generating and limiting new ways of being. Second, we introduce new ideas to the field and articulate a vision for what we call a 'futurology' of hepatitis C, designed to counter these assumptions and take us beyond problematic temporal logics. Our futurology is inspired by the work of Cuevas-Hewitt (2011) on the 'futurology of the present'. Cuevas-Hewitt's approach discards linear temporalities, expectations of revolution and reform, and instead pays attention to multiplicities of becoming in the perpetual present. Taking up ideas from Cuevas-Hewitt, we introduce our own sketches for a 'futurology of hepatitis C'. This is a set of practices for thinking, researching, writing about and otherwise engaging with hepatitis C, characterised by attention not to what an imagined, singular future might look like, or to assumptions about treatment as revolutionary, but to what Cuevas-Hewitt (2011) calls the multiple 'perpetual presents' already with us, and aims to foment hope for change.
澳大利亚最近对直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的投资和乐观态度带来了新的药物前景,包括可能出现丙型肝炎后时代和受该病影响人群生活的革命。但是,情况是否比我们想象的更复杂?对治愈后的生活有哪些期望?在此过程中忽略了什么?我们认为,丙型肝炎政策、实践和研究可以体现出一种对医学和“未来”的有问题的取向,并探讨如何超越这些取向。本文随后分为两个主要阶段。首先,我们结合现有研究的批判和一项关于丙型肝炎“治愈后”生活的新研究的初步见解,概述了一些关于治愈和治愈后生活的关键逻辑,并解释了为什么这些逻辑存在问题。我们反对这样一种假设,即医疗治愈的可用性将单独扭转导致感染和限制服务获取的根深蒂固的社会、政治和结构动态。要做到这一点,我们注意到,就是忽略构成丙型肝炎和注射吸毒的意义网络和权力关系,并使那些与之相关的人边缘化和被剥夺权利。这种乐观主义抹去了在治愈前世界制定的法律和政策的遗产,以及它们在产生和限制新的生存方式方面的作用。其次,我们向该领域引入新的想法,并阐述了我们所谓的丙型肝炎“未来学”的愿景,旨在对抗这些假设并超越有问题的时间逻辑。我们的未来学受到 Cuevas-Hewitt(2011)关于“现在的未来学”的工作的启发。Cuevas-Hewitt 的方法摒弃了线性时间性、对革命和改革的期望,而是关注永恒现在中的多种变化。借鉴 Cuevas-Hewitt 的想法,我们为自己提出了丙型肝炎“未来学”的草图。这是一套思考、研究、书写和以其他方式参与丙型肝炎的实践,其特点是不仅关注想象中的、单一的未来会是什么样子,也不关注治疗的革命性,而是关注 Cuevas-Hewitt(2011)所说的已经存在的多重“永恒现在”,并旨在为变革带来希望。