Suppr超能文献

经皮二氧化碳监测在慢性阻塞性肺疾病运动气体交换效率中的应用。

Transcutaneous PCO for Exercise Gas Exchange Efficiency in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

机构信息

The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.

Department of Cardio-Pulmonary function, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.

出版信息

COPD. 2021 Feb;18(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1858403. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

Abstract

Gas exchange inefficiency and dynamic hyperinflation contributes to exercise limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is also characterized by an elevated fraction of physiological dead space (V/V). Noninvasive methods for accurate V/V assessment during exercise in patients are lacking. The current study sought to compare transcutaneous PCO (TcPCO) with the gold standard-arterial PCO (PaCO)-and other available methods (end tidal CO and the Jones equation) for estimating V/V during incremental exercise in COPD. Ten COPD patients completed a symptom limited incremental cycle exercise. TcPCO was measured by a heated electrode on the ear-lobe. Radial artery blood was collected at rest, during unloaded cycling (UL) and every minute during exercise and recovery. Ventilation and gas exchange were measured breath-by-breath. Bland-Altman analysis examined agreement of PCO and V/V calculated using PaCO, TcPCO, end-tidal PCO (PCO) and estimated PaCO by the Jones equation (PaCO-Jones). Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) was assessed. 114 measurements were obtained from the 10 COPD subjects. The bias between TcPCO and PaCO was 0.86 mmHg with upper and lower limit of agreement ranging -2.28 mmHg to 3.99 mmHg. Correlation between TcPCO and PaCO during rest and exercise was r=0.907 ( < 0.001; CCC = 0.941) and V/V using TcPCO vs. PaCO was r=0.958 ( < 0.0001; CCC = 0.967). Correlation between PaCO-Jones and PCO vs. PaCO were r=0.755, 0.755, ( < 0.001; CCC = 0.832, 0.718) and for V/V calculation (r=0.793, 0.610;  < 0.0001; CCC = 0.760, 0.448), respectively. The results support the accuracy of TcPCO to reflect PaCO and calculate V/V during rest and exercise, but not in recovery, in COPD patients, enabling improved accuracy of noninvasive assessment of gas exchange inefficiency during incremental exercise testing.

摘要

气体交换效率低下和动态过度充气导致慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动受限。它还表现为生理死腔分数(V/V)升高。目前缺乏在运动过程中对患者进行无创性准确 V/V 评估的方法。本研究旨在比较经皮二氧化碳分压(TcPCO)与金标准-动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO)和其他可用方法(潮气末二氧化碳和琼斯方程)在 COPD 递增运动中评估 V/V 的能力。10 例 COPD 患者完成了一项症状限制递增循环运动。TcPCO 通过耳垂上的加热电极进行测量。在休息、无负荷骑行(UL)期间以及运动和恢复期间的每一分钟收集桡动脉血。通过呼吸对通气和气体交换进行了逐口气测量。Bland-Altman 分析检查了使用 PaCO、TcPCO、潮气末 PCO(PCO)和琼斯方程估计的 PaCO(PaCO-Jones)计算的 PCO 和 V/V 的一致性。评估了林氏一致性相关系数(CCC)。从 10 例 COPD 患者中获得了 114 次测量值。TcPCO 与 PaCO 之间的偏差为 0.86mmHg,上下限一致性范围为-2.28mmHg 至 3.99mmHg。休息和运动时 TcPCO 与 PaCO 之间的相关性为 r=0.907(<0.001;CCC=0.941),使用 TcPCO 与 PaCO 计算的 V/V 为 r=0.958(<0.0001;CCC=0.967)。PaCO-Jones 与 PCO 与 PaCO 之间的相关性分别为 r=0.755、0.755(<0.001;CCC=0.832、0.718),而 V/V 计算的相关性分别为 r=0.793、0.610(<0.0001;CCC=0.760、0.448)。结果支持 TcPCO 在 COPD 患者休息和运动期间反映 PaCO 和计算 V/V 的准确性,但在恢复期间则不行,从而提高了递增运动试验中无创性评估气体交换效率低下的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验