Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;77(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.005. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
Extraglottic airway devices are frequently used during cardiac arrest resuscitations and for failed intubation attempts. Recent literature suggests that many extraglottic airway devices are misplaced. The aim of this study is to create a classification system for extraglottic airway device misplacement and describe its frequency in a cohort of decedents who died with an extraglottic airway device in situ.
We assembled a cohort of all decedents who died with an extraglottic airway device in situ and underwent postmortem computed tomographic (CT) imaging at the state medical examiner's office during a 6-year period, using retrospective data. An expert panel developed a novel extraglottic airway device misplacement classification system. We then applied the schema in reviewing postmortem CT for extraglottic airway device position and potential complications.
We identified 341 eligible decedents. The median age was 47.0 years (interquartile range 32 to 59 years). Out-of-hospital personnel placed extraglottic airway devices in 265 patients (77.7%) who subsequently died out of hospital; the remainder died inhospital. The classification system consisted of 6 components: depth, size, rotation, device kinking, mechanical blockage of ventilation opening, and injury. Under the system, extraglottic airway devices were found to be misplaced in 49 cases (14.4%), including 5 (1.5%) that resulted in severe injuries.
We created a novel extraglottic airway device misplacement classification system. Misplacement occurred in greater than 14% of cases. Severe traumatic complications occurred rarely. Quality improvement activities should include review of extraglottic airway device placement when CT images are available and use the classification system to describe misplacements.
在心脏骤停复苏和插管失败期间,经常使用声门外气道装置。最近的文献表明,许多声门外气道装置位置不当。本研究的目的是创建一个声门外气道装置错位分类系统,并描述其在一批原位存在声门外气道装置的死者中的发生率。
我们收集了在州法医办公室进行 6 年期间接受死后计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的所有原位存在声门外气道装置且死亡的死者队列,并使用回顾性数据。一个专家小组开发了一种新的声门外气道装置错位分类系统。然后,我们应用该方案审查死后 CT 以确定声门外气道装置的位置和潜在并发症。
我们确定了 341 名符合条件的死者。中位年龄为 47.0 岁(四分位距 32 至 59 岁)。265 名院外人员为随后在院外死亡的患者放置了声门外气道装置;其余患者死于院内。分类系统由 6 个部分组成:深度、大小、旋转、装置扭结、通气口机械阻塞和损伤。根据该系统,49 例(14.4%)声门外气道装置被发现位置不当,其中 5 例(1.5%)导致严重损伤。
我们创建了一种新的声门外气道装置错位分类系统。错位发生率超过 14%。严重创伤性并发症很少发生。质量改进活动应包括在有 CT 图像时审查声门外气道装置的放置,并使用分类系统描述错位情况。